Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Expanding access to high-cost medicines through the E2 access program in Thailand: effects on utilisation, health outcomes and cost using an interrupted time-series analysis
  1. Rosarin Sruamsiri1,2,
  2. Anita K Wagner2,
  3. Dennis Ross-Degnan2,
  4. Christine Y Lu2,
  5. Teerapon Dhippayom3,
  6. Surachat Ngorsuraches4,
  7. Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk1,5,6,7
  1. 1Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Center of Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
  2. 2Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3Pharmaceutical Care Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
  4. 4College of Pharmacy, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA
  5. 5School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  6. 6School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  7. 7School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  1. Correspondence to Professor Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; nathorn.chaiyakunapruk{at}monash.edu

Abstract

Objective In 2008, the Thai government introduced the ‘high-cost medicines E2 access program’ as a part of the National List of Essential Medicines to increase patient access to medicines, improve clinical outcomes and make medicines more affordable. Our objective was to examine whether the ‘high-cost medicines E2 access program’ achieved its goals.

Design Interrupted time-series design study.

Setting 3 tertiary hospitals in different regions of Thailand, January 2006 to December 2012.

Participants Patients with target acute and chronic disease diagnoses who newly met E2 program criteria for selected study medicines.

Intervention High-cost medicines E2 access program.

Main outcomes measures Level and trend changes over time in the proportions of eligible patients who received the indicated E2 medicines and who improved clinically, as well as in costs of treatment.

Results A total of 2024 patients were included in utilisation analyses and 1375 patients with selected acute diseases contributed to analyses of clinical outcome. After 1 year of the E2 program implementation, the percentage of eligible patients receiving the indicated E2 program medicines increased significantly (relative change 12.7% (95% CI 4.4% to 21.0%), especially among those insured by the government's universal coverage scheme (relative change 19.9% (95% CI 9.5% to 30.5%)). The increase in the proportion of clinically improved patients with acute conditions was not significant (relative change 6.2% (95% CI −1.9% to 15.1%)). Quarterly healthcare costs per patient dropped significantly (relative change −13.5% (95% CI −26.9% to −1.7%)).

Conclusions In the study hospitals, the E2 access program seems to have facilitated patient access to specialty medicines, may have contributed to improved health outcomes, and decreased treatment costs. Routine monitoring is needed to assess effects of expanding the programme, including effects on quality of care and financial sustainability.

  • policy evaluation
  • Interrupted time series
  • Access
  • Clinical outcome
  • Health care cost
  • High-cost medicines

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.