Publication and non-publication of drug trial results: a 10-year cohort of trials in Norwegian general practiceAnja Maria Brænd, Jørund Straand, Rune Bruhn Jakobsen, Atle Klovning
11 April 2016
Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional studyWilliam T Gattrell, Sally Hopewell, Kate Young, Paul Farrow, Richard White, Elizabeth Wager, Christopher C Winchester
21 February 2016
How often are interventions in cluster-randomised controlled trials of complex interventions in general practices effective and reasons for potential shortcomings? Protocol and results of a feasibility project for a systematic reviewAndrea Siebenhofer, Stefanie Erckenbrecht, Gudrun Pregartner, Andrea Berghold, Christiane Muth
18 February 2016
How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchersJ K Tijdink, K Schipper, L M Bouter, P Maclaine Pont, J de Jonge, Y M Smulders
17 February 2016
Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensusDirk Bassler, Katharina F Mueller, Matthias Briel, Jos Kleijnen, Ana Marusic, Elizabeth Wager, Gerd Antes, Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Joerg J Meerpohl
21 January 2016
Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchersM Harris, J Macinko, G Jimenez, M Mahfoud, C Anderson
30 December 2015
What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventionsTammy C Hoffmann, Marion F Walker, Peter Langhorne, Sally Eames, Emma Thomas, Paul Glasziou
17 November 2015
Clinical trial registration, reporting, publication and FDAAA compliance: a cross-sectional analysis and ranking of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2012Jennifer E Miller, David Korn, Joseph S Ross
12 November 2015
Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort studyMarlies van Lent, Joanna IntHout, Henk Jan Out
30 September 2015
Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review modelsMaria K Kowalczuk, Frank Dudbridge, Shreeya Nanda, Stephanie L Harriman, Jigisha Patel, Elizabeth C Moylan
29 September 2015
