You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Epidemiology
Cohort profile
Cohort profile: design and methods in the eye and vision consortium of UK Biobank
  1. Sharon Yu Lin Chua1,
  2. Dhanes Thomas1,
  3. Naomi Allen2,
  4. Andrew Lotery3,
  5. Parul Desai1,
  6. Praveen Patel1,
  7. Zaynah Muthy1,
  8. Cathie Sudlow4,
  9. Tunde Peto5,
  10. Peng Tee Khaw1,
  11. Paul J Foster1
  12. UK Biobank Eye & Vision Consortium
    1. 1 NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
    2. 2 Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
    3. 3 Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
    4. 4 Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
    5. 5 Institute of Clinical Science, Queen’s University Belfast Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Belfast, Belfast, UK
    1. Correspondence to Dr Paul J Foster; p.foster{at}ucl.ac.uk

    Abstract

    Purpose To describe the rationale, methods and research potential of eye and vision measures available in UK Biobank.

    Participants UK Biobank is a large, multisite, prospective cohort study. Extensive lifestyle and health questionnaires, a range of physical measures and collection of biological specimens are collected. The scope of UK Biobank was extended midway through data collection to include assessments of other measures of health, including eyes and vision. The eye assessment at baseline included questionnaires detailing past ophthalmic and family history, measurement of visual acuity, refractive error and keratometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal biomechanics, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula and a disc–macula fundus photograph. Since recruitment, UK Biobank has collected accelerometer data and begun multimodal imaging data (including brain, heart and abdominal MRI) in 100 000 participants. Dense genotypic data and a panel of 20 biochemistry measures are available, and linkage to medical health records for the full cohort has begun.

    Findings to date A total of 502 665 people aged between 40 and 69 were recruited to participate in UK Biobank. Of these, 117 175 took part in baseline assessment of vision, IOP, refraction and keratometry. A subgroup of 67 321 underwent OCT and retinal photography. The introduction of eye and vision measures in UK Biobank was accompanied by intensive training, support and a data monitoring quality control process.

    Future plans UK Biobank is one of the largest prospective cohorts worldwide with extensive data on ophthalmic diseases and conditions. Data collection is an ongoing process and a repeat of the baseline assessment including the questionnaires, measurements and sample collection will be performed in subsets of 25 000 participants every 2–3 years. The depth and breadth of this dataset, coupled with its open-access policy, will create a powerful resource for all researchers to investigate the eye diseases in later life.

    • epidemiology
    • dementia
    • medical retina
    • medical ophthalmology

    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025077

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

      Request Permissions

      If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

      Strengths and limitations of this study

      • UK Biobank is the largest prospective cohort with extensive measures on ophthalmic diseases and conditions.

      • Repeated physical measures every few years and linkage to National Health Service records will provide valuable information on health outcomes.

      • A large number of incident cases of eye diseases in 5 years will allow the detection and quantification of small effect sizes.

      • A low response rate (5.5%).

      Introduction 

      Ageing populations worldwide face an increasing burden of chronic and neurodegenerative diseases,1 resulting in substantial health and economic burdens.2 3 Chronic age-related eye diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR) and glaucoma, are leading causes of visual impairment in Western populations. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is one of the most significant risk factors for the development4 and progression5 of glaucoma. A recent study from the UK Biobank demonstrated that factors including diabetes, height, smoking and black ethnicity have different associations with Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc).6 Hence, suggesting that these factors are related to corneal biomechanical properties. In another UK Biobank study, 67 321 participants underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of both eyes.7 The OCT is a non-invasive imaging system that provides high-resolution, cross-sectional images of the retina, retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and the optic nerve, aiding in the diagnosis and management of eye diseases.8 Loss of vision due to eye diseases has a considerable impact on an individual’s activities and quality of life.9 10 Identifying modifiable risk factors of common disabling diseases of later life may help develop preventive strategies. These conditions are often caused by a combination of genetics, environmental and lifestyle factors. Built on a foundation laid by the Human Genome Project,11 the last decade has seen dramatic advances in the understanding of molecular mechanisms in the human health and disease. A myriad of studies using traditional linkage methods and genome-wide association studies12–14 have now raised questions about the role of gene–gene (GxG) and gene–environment (GxE) interaction in determining disease susceptibility.15 16 Extensive information on environment and lifestyle in conjunction with biological samples are crucial to assess GxE interactions.

      To avoid the potential for reverse causality and minimise recall bias, exposures should be measured before they are affected by disease or its treatment. Prospective cohorts offer many advantages for assessing the combined effects of genes, environment and lifestyle factors and its association with various health outcomes. The prospective nature of these cohorts allows the exposures to be recorded before the disease onset, and a wide range of diseases to be investigated, including those that may be challenging to study retrospectively.17 Furthermore, the overall beneficial and adverse effects of a specific exposure on the lifetime risks of numerous diseases can be examined. Only a small proportion of individuals will develop the disease and the effects of various exposures on disease development are likely to be modest. Hence, to address questions of GxG and GxE interaction, prospective studies need to include a large number of participants, with several hundred thousand participants.18 19 However, there is a lack of large prospective studies at such a scale that allow investigation of risk factors or gene–environmental interaction of eye diseases.

      UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/) is a large-scale multisite cohort study, conceived to provide a resource for the scientific community to examine genetic and environmental risk factors for complex diseases of middle and old age in the UK population. UK Biobank has collected extensive baseline questionnaire data, physical measures and biological samples, with comprehensive follow-up and characterisation of many different health outcomes.20 Towards the end of the baseline phase, the UK Biobank Steering Committee advised the broadening of the scope of the study to include more detailed examination of participants, including assessment of arterial stiffness, a hearing test, additional cognitive function tests, cardiorespiratory fitness, collection of whole blood and saliva, as well as an examination of eyes and vision. The UK Biobank eye and vision data provide researchers with a unique opportunity to access a very large dataset containing detailed ocular phenotypic information, together with rich biomarker variables, dense genotyping and extensive information on lifestyle variables, medical history and healthcare episodes, thus giving unique research resource. As such, UK Biobank offers comprehensive data to explore novel aetiological associations, risk factors and to make evidence-based recommendations on policy. This report aims to describe the methods and the baseline characteristics of the participants who underwent eye and vision assessment in UK Biobank.

      Cohort description

      Whole UK Biobank cohort

      UK Biobank is a large, multisite, study of 502 656 UK residents aged between 40 and 69 years who were registered with the National Health Service (NHS). The overall study protocol (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/resources/) and protocols for individual tests (http://biobank.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/crystal/catalogs.cgi) are available online. Briefly, extensive baseline questionnaires and physical measures were obtained from 22 assessment centres between January 2006 and October 2010.20 21 This included data on sociodemographics, family history and early life exposures, psychosocial, environmental, lifestyle, environmental and health status, hearing threshold and cognitive function as well as self-reported medical conditions. In addition to the baseline questionnaire, web-based questionnaires were included to obtain data on dietary intake, occupational history, cognitive function, mental health and gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition, mailed triaxial accelerometers will supplement the physical activity data in 100 000 participants.20

      Physical examination included blood pressure, heart rate, hand grip strength, anthropometrics, spirometry, bone density, arterial stiffness, fitness test. Biological samples, including stored blood, urine and saliva samples, were collected to allow many different types of assay (eg, genetic, proteomic, metabolomics, biochemical and haematologic), (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/)22 23 providing a uniquely rich resource for investigating aetiological risk factors and thereby assisting in the prevention and treatment of many different conditions. The UK Biobank Axiom array was used for genotyping and the methods have been described in detail.23 Furthermore, UK Biobank launched the world’s largest health imaging study in 2014 (www.imaging.ukbiobank.ac.uk) that aims to perform MRI of brain, heart and abdomen, carotid ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body scans on 100 000 participants.24 A detailed follow-up of participants over a 20-year period is envisaged through data linkage to national electronic medical records. Thus, linking to NHS will provide valuable information on health outcomes (eg, mortality, cancer registrations, hospital admissions, primary care data, etc).

      The key ethics and governance principles relating to UK Biobank are laid out in the Ethics and Governance Framework,22 prepared by the project funders. Major funders include Medical Research Council (MRC) and Wellcome Trust, while other funding bodies include Department of Health (DoH), Scottish Government and the Welsh Government, North West Development Agency, British Heart Foundation and Diabetes UK. All participants provided informed consent.

      UK Biobank eye and vision subcohort

      Study location

      Ocular measurements commenced in late 2009 at six assessment centres as an additional enhancement to the initial baseline measures. The six centres are distributed across the UK, including Croydon and Hounslow in Greater London, Liverpool and Sheffield in Northern England, Birmingham in the Midlands and Swansea in Wales.6

      Examination procedures

      Questionnaires

      Self-reported eye diseases, including glaucoma, DR and AMD, were obtained from self-administered questionnaires.

      Measurements

      The methods and protocol for the ocular examination component were designed by ophthalmologists from Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH), London, UK. The core funding for the examination was provided by the Wellcome Trust, the MRC and the DoH. Additional support for training, implementation and quality control came from the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at MEH. All ocular examinations were undertaken by trained personnel to ensure that the ocular measurements were acquired in a stepwise manner using standard operating procedures or instructions, and they had to pass a structured examination before the project started. The entire process including the teaching material was reviewed and moderated by an ophthalmologist from MEH, London, UK. The ocular examinations were conducted without pharmacological mydriasis and took an average time of 11 min to complete.7 Baseline eye examination was conducted from June 2009 to July 2010, subsequently, from August 2012 to June 2013, a subset of approximately 20 000 underwent follow-up examination, including all eye measures.

      Visual acuity

      Visual acuity (VA) was measured using a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) chart (Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois, USA) on a computer screen under standard illumination. It follows the British Standards Institute,25 and the right eye was measured first. The test was performed with participants wearing the distance refraction at 4 m, or at 1 m if a participant was unable to read. Participants were asked to read each letter from the top of the chart and down as far as possible. The test was terminated when ≥2 letters are incorrect and recorded as LogMAR VA.

      Refraction

      Non-cycloplegic autorefraction was performed using the Tomey RC-5000 Auto Refkeratometer (Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) and the right eye was measured first. For each eye, up to 10 measurements were taken and each measurement had a score between 0 and 9 (smaller scores indicate more reliable measurements). To ensure measurements were reliable, each reading achieved a score of ≤4.26

      Intraocular pressure

      IOP was measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) (Reichert, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA).27 One measurement was taken for each eye and the right eye was measured first. The ORA uses a rapid pulse air to indent the cornea and an electro-optical system records the corneal deformation. Two applanation measurements are recorded: (1) while the cornea moves inwards, achieving a first applanation state or flattening (P1); (2) when the cornea recovers from its slight concave state as the pressure decreases, and the cornea passes through a second applanated state (P2). Hence, P1 and P2 are air pressures that correspond with the two applanation states of the cornea.28 The average of the 2 ORA pressure values was calibrated against Goldmann applanation tonometer to derive IOPg (mm Hg) A separate IOPcc reading (IOPcc=P1 and 0.43*P2) was derived to limit the difference before and after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery and has, therefore, limited influence from corneal biomechanics than those provided by Goldmann applanation tonometer.27 29

      Corneal hysteresis

      Corneal hysteresis (CH) is considered an indicator of corneal viscous energy damping and is derived as the difference between P1 and P2: CH=P1 and P2.27 28

      Optical coherence tomography

      OCT images were obtained using a spectral domain OCT 3-dimensional (3D OCT-1000 Mark II, Topcon, Japan). The scans were conducted in a darkened room under standard illumination without pupil dilation using a 3D macular volume scan (512 horizontal A-scans/B-scan; 128 B-scans in a 6×6 mm raster pattern). The methodology of the OCT imaging has been described previously.7 30

      Fundus photography

      Colour photographs of the optic disc and macular were acquired using a Topcon 3D OCT-1000 Mark II system. The Topcon 3D OCT-1000 has a field angle of 45°, a digital zoom (2X, 4X), scanning range of 6×6 mm, 4.5×4.5 mm, 3×3 mm and a scanning speed of 18 000 A-scans per second. The horizontal and longitudinal (depth) resolutions were ≤20 µm and 5–6 µm, respectively.31

      Data monitoring and quality assessment feedback

      Daily monitoring of data collection was performed by UK Biobank using a custom-designed monitoring software (WACMAN). The WACMAN software monitored the data items collected and allowed individual operator’s performance to be reviewed—the number of measurements skipped and the degree to which the data collected by the operator lay within the range of expected values. The performance of the technicians responsible for ophthalmic imaging was monitored to provide feedback to those producing substandard quality images within three working days. This was achieved by grading the first 100 photographs of each technician and at least 5% of all OCT images.

      Patient and public involvement

      UK Biobank maintains a website to keep participants and researchers up to date on the study, which contains a news feed (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/news/) and feedback service. In addition, UK Biobank has a twitter feed.

      There is an annual scientific meeting which is recorded and available to the public as webcast.

      The study was set up by the MRC, DoH and Wellcome Trust with input from major patient representative organisations (British Heart Foundation and Cancer Research UK) http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/public-consultation/

      Statistical analysis

      The baseline ocular characteristics were analysed and presented as mean±SD for continuous variables and number (%) for categorical variables. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA software V.13.0 (StataCorp).

      Results

      Findings to date

      In total, ocular measures including VA, refraction and IOP data were measured in approximately 117 175 people aged 40–69 years. Of these, OCT imaging and fundus photography were performed in 67 321 (57.5%) participants. Figure 1 describes the number of participants with eye measures at baseline and first repeat visit. Table 1 describes the baseline characteristics of participants in the total cohort, and among participants with various ocular measurements at baseline and at first repeat visits. Compared with the whole UK Biobank cohort, participants with baseline VA and OCT measures consisted of a higher proportion of Asians, blacks and mixed/others ethnic groups and had more positive Townsend Deprivation Index. Compared with participants with baseline eye measures, those with repeat visit of VA or OCT data were older, more likely male, of white ethnic background, had the educational level of degree and above, had more negative Townsend Deprivation Index or better socioeconomic status and less likely to smoke.

      Figure 1
      Figure 1

      Flow chart of participants with the eye measures at baseline and first repeat visit in the UK Biobank. IOP, intraocular pressure; OCT, optical coherence tomography; VA, visual acuity.

      View this table:
      Table 1

      Comparison of baseline characteristics between participants in the whole UK Biobank cohort and those with various ocular measurements

      Table 2 summarises the number of participants completing each test and the summary measures for these tests. The VA and refractive error measures were quite similar at baseline and at the first repeat visits. Mean VA was approximately 0.0 LogMAR at both visits. At both visit, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was −0.3 D. Approximately 60% of participants were non-myopic, while the proportion of participants with low, moderate and high myopia were 24%, 11% and 5%, respectively. Participants’ mean IOP was slightly higher at first repeat visit than at baseline. The mean IOPg ranged from 15.7 mm Hg to 16.2 mm Hg, while IOPcc ranged from 16.0 mm Hg to 16.5 mm Hg. The proportion of participants with ocular hypertension was 12% at baseline and 16% at first repeat visit. Projected number of new cases of eye diseases including AMD, cataract and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) expected to occur among the whole UK Biobank cohort and subcohort during the period of 25 years follow-up (table 3).32 By 2023, the expected number of new cases of any AMD, cataract and POAG were around 11 753, 107 702 and 8704 in the whole cohort, respectively, with around 14% of these cases occurring in the ocular subcohort. From 2023 to 2033, the expected number of new cases of any AMD increased by 3.5 times, while the expected number of cataract and POAG increased by two times.

      View this table:
      Table 2

      Ocular characteristics of participants in the UK Biobank at baseline visit and at the first repeat visit

      View this table:
      Table 3

      Predicted number of new cases of eye diseases expected to occur during the first 25 years of follow-up in UK Biobank

      Findings from the UK Biobank eye data showed that first-born individuals were more often myopic than non-first-born,33 which confirms previous findings.34 35 New findings include the discovery of 112 loci, including 68 novel loci, associated with IOP and the development of POAG. Several loci suggest the importance of angiopoietin-receptor tyrosine kinase (ANG-TEK) in signalling IOP regulation, thus suggesting ANG-TEK to be a therapeutic target. In individuals without neurodegeneration, thinner RNFL was associated with worse cognitive function and more likely to have future cognitive decline.36 The use of deep-learning models predicted cardiovascular risk factors such as age (mean absolute error within 3.26 years), gender (area under the curve (AUC)=0.97), smoking status (AUC=0.71), systolic blood pressure (mean absolute error within 11.23 mm Hg) and major adverse cardiac events (AUC=0.70).37

      Discussion

      Common age-related eye diseases, including AMD, DR, glaucoma and myopia, are leading causes of visual impairment,38 and have both genetic and environmental contributions. Smoking and age are the most consistently observed non-genetic risk factors for AMD,39 and several established genetic risk factors have been identified.40 41 Significant gene–environmental interactions have been identified for complement factor H gene and smoking for AMD.42 However, limitations exist and generalisability of the findings is uncertain. Hence, future prospective studies of larger sample size would help to clarify the issue. The UK is in an ideal position to undertake ambitious ‘big data’ health sciences research, given the extensive coverage of the NHS and various detailed health record systems. UK Biobank has begun to harness these strengths to deliver epidemiological research at scale. Repeating detailed physical measures every few years in subsets of 20–25 000 participants adds a powerful longitudinal dimension, with health-related outcomes being tracked through linkage to NHS records including death and cancer registers, hospital inpatient and outpatient episodes and primary care. Other health record linkage including data from national mental healthcare, residential history, laboratory and disease audit datasets, National Ophthalmology Database Audit, OpenEyes, Medisoft Ophthalmology, and may also include imaging, cancer screening and dental.20 To enhance accurate identification of health outcomes, additional methods such as cross-referencing against NHS case records, imaging and eye data or banked tissues will be used for validation and subclassification.

      Scope of eye data

      UK Biobank is among the largest eye and vision datasets globally. By 2023, >11 000 incident cases of AMD, >8000 cases of POAG and about 107 000 cataract surgeries will have occurred in the whole UK Biobank cohort.32 This large number of new cases of eye diseases will provide substantial power for nested case–control studies to detect the main effect OR of 1.3 or higher.43 With the rise in ageing population, the rates of chronic eye diseases will increase. However, the rates of undiagnosed eye diseases remain high. Population-based studies reported that at least 50% of whites,44–47 and 55%–90% of Asians48–50 have undiagnosed glaucoma. Approximately 70% of undiagnosed cataracts were reported in USA51 and Singapore.52 In addition to undiagnosed eye conditions, people were found to be unaware of their eye conditions. Previous population-based reported that only 5%–46% of those identified as having an eye disease (eg, AMD,53 cataract,53 glaucoma and DR,54 accurately self-reporting their disease).55 Hence, linking to electronic health records is essential to ensure accuracy in identification of eye diseases. In UK Biobank, the overall self-reported glaucoma rate was 1.7% among people aged 40–69 years.56 This rate appears to be lower compared with White populations aged 40 years and older in the USA (2.08%),46 Australia (2.0%)57 and Italy (2.9%).58

      Retina and the cardiovascular system

      Retinal imaging has provided probably the richest data relating to eyes and vision in UK Biobank. In addition to giving unprecedented power to examine diseases of the eye, retinal morphometry can give insights into the diseases of the vascular and neurological systems. The retina shares similar embryological origin, anatomical features and physiological properties with the brain,59 it offers an accessible site to investigate the central nervous system in vivo.60 Using fundus photographs, retinal microvascular morphometry offers the prospect of meaningful improvements in risk stratification in cardiovascular disease.61 Table 4 summarises major longitudinal cohort studies (n<10 000) on an eye and systemic diseases that were performed among the Western populations62–68 and Asian populations.69–75 Early signs of elevated risk of major systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus,76 stroke,77–79 hypertension80 and cardiovascular diseases,81 can be detected in the retinal blood vessels. The advent of powerful computer-based algorithms offers the prospect of truly ground-breaking advances in medical care.37 A recent study demonstrated that the application of deep learning to retinal fundus images can be used to predict cardiovascular risk factors such as age, gender and smoking status.37

      View this table:
      Table 4

      Characteristics of prospective cohort studies on eye diseases (n≤10 000)

      Neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) all have a measurable effect on the retina. Recent studies using OCT showed differences in inner retinal layers between the normal population and participants with PD,82 AD83 and MS.84 Studies have shown reduction in the ganglion cell layer along with the inner plexiform layer in patients with AD compared with healthy controls,85–87 while others reported thinning in the RNFL, especially in the superior and inferior quadrants.83 88–90 With a large cohort and detailed measurements at multiple time points, the UK Biobank is able to assess if changes in the eye precede development of these conditions or are a consequence from the neurodegenerative conditions.

      Comparison with other cohorts, biobanks and consortia

      Table 5 describes large prospective cohorts (>10 000) that examine associations with eye diseases. European studies include the Rotterdam Study of 14 926 participants aged 45 years or older91 and the Gutenberg Health Study of 14 700 participants aged 35–74 years.92 In Asia, the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study performed health screening on 281 238 employees aged 20 years and older. However, there are limited ocular measurements with the KSH study.93 94 Large prospective studies are well suited for investigating the risk factors for diseases and could either be conducted as a biobank such as the UK Biobank,22 China Kadoorie Biobank95 and The American Cancer Society’s Cancer Prevention Study 396 or a consortium such as the P3G consortium,97 National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium,98 Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology99 and European Eye Epidemiology (E3) consortium. However, eye measures are not available on most of these large prospective studies except the UK Biobank and E3 consortium. The major differences between the biobank design and consortia are that the latter are often developed by pooling data from different studies with disparate consent/governance procedures that may limit the power to address previously unanticipated research questions.100 Moreover, there is more variability in sampling, measurements of exposures and identification of diseases ascertained.101 102 In contrast, biobanks are usually planned in advance with uniformity in collection of samples and genotyping has been carried out according to a predetermined strategy. Thus, consortia are typically regarded as less robust because of problems with direct and imputed genotyping, and non-standardised diagnostic criteria.

      View this table:
      Table 5

      Characteristics of prospective cohort studies on eye diseases (n≥10 000)

      Strengths and limitations

      UK Biobank is the only prospective study with a very large sample size (>100 000) of participants with a range of eye measures. With the projected number of new cases diagnosed with a range of eye diseases, it will allow researchers to investigate the genetic, environmental and lifestyle risk factors of various eye diseases. In addition, there are intensive methods to ascertain outcomes with electronic and semiautomated sources for validation and sub classification.20

      Despite the scope of eye data collected in the UK Biobank, limitations exist within the study. One important limitation of UK Biobank was its low response rate (5.5%), and that participants were more likely to be from a healthier, more affluent sector of the UK population. However, it is unlikely that the direction of the association is opposite in respondents and non-respondents, and hence representativeness is not a major concern. The UK Biobank was not set up to be representative of the general UK population. More importantly, the large sample size and extensive exposures allow for valid scientific inferences of associations between exposures and health outcomes that are generalisable to the wider population. In addition, a large number of cases allow the detection and quantification of small effect sizes. Eye measurements were performed in 6 out of 22 of the assessment centres and participants with eye measures tend to have an education level of degree and above compared with the whole UK Biobank cohort. Hence, they may come from a more affluent sector and may not represent the whole UK Biobank cohort. The first repeat eye measure was only performed in approximately 20 000 participants. However, a repeat of the baseline visit will be conducted every few years in subsets of 20–25 000 participants. The self-reported nature of eye diseases may result in recall bias and misclassification error. However, the biases should be minimal as the ascertainment of outcomes will be conducted through linkages to national healthcare database, relevant administrative databases and analysis of available phenotypic data. We have access to medical records.32

      Collaboration

      UK Biobank aims to provide open access data for health-related research and the data are made available to all bona fide researchers from the academic, charity, public and commercial sectors, both in the UK and internationally, without preferential or exclusive access for any user.20 All interested researchers may apply to access the data via an online application. Strict guidelines are in place to help ensure anonymity and confidentiality of participants’ data and samples.103

      Conclusion

      UK Biobank Eye and Vision data would allow investigation of the factors leading to the onset and disease progression of major eye diseases. In addition, the ocular phenotypes could be explored with systemic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and neurological diseases. In conclusion, the extensive exposures and health outcomes available in the UK Biobank will provide scientists with insights into the predictors of ocular and systemic diseases, allowing customised treatment therapies and interventions tailored to the individual patient. Furthermore, its collaborative and multidisciplinary research allows scientists to use known or innovative methods to explore and further develop techniques and treatment strategies that could have a major impact on the field of biomedical, behavioural or clinical research.

      Acknowledgments

      We would like to acknowledge Tim Sprosen, Alan Young, Sir Rory Collins (all Oxford University Clinical Trials Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit) and all those who had contributed to design and development of the UK Biobank eye data resource.

      References

      1. 1.↵
        2. Niccoli T ,
        3. Partridge L
        . Ageing as a risk factor for disease. Curr Biol 2012;22:R741–R752.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.024
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      2. 2.↵
        Organization WH. World report on ageing and health world health organization. 2015 http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/world-report-2015/en/.
      3. 3.↵
        2. Bommer C ,
        3. Heesemann E ,
        4. Sagalova V , et al
        . The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20-79 years: a cost-of-illness study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:423–30.doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30097-9
        OpenUrl
      4. 4.↵
        2. de Voogd S ,
        3. Ikram MK ,
        4. Wolfs RC , et al
        . Incidence of open-angle glaucoma in a general elderly population: the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1487–93.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.04.018
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      5. 5.↵
        2. Leske MC ,
        3. Heijl A ,
        4. Hyman L , et al
        . Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1965–72.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      6. 6.↵
        2. Chan MP ,
        3. Grossi CM ,
        4. Khawaja AP , et al
        . Associations with intraocular pressure in a large cohort: Results from the UK Biobank. Ophthalmology 2016;123:771–82.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.031
        OpenUrl
      7. 7.↵
        2. Keane PA ,
        3. Grossi CM ,
        4. Foster PJ , et al
        . Optical coherence tomography in the uk biobank study - rapid automated analysis of retinal thickness for large population-based studies. PLoS One 2016;11:e0164095.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164095
      8. 8.↵
        2. Adhi M ,
        3. Duker JS
        . Optical coherence tomography-current and future applications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013;24:213–21.doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835f8bf8
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      9. 9.↵
        2. Williams GP ,
        3. Pathak-Ray V ,
        4. Austin MW
        . The social impact of visual impairment. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:986.
        OpenUrlFREE Full Text
      10. 10.↵
        2. Köberlein J ,
        3. Beifus K ,
        4. Schaffert C , et al
        . The economic burden of visual impairment and blindness: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003471.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003471
      11. 11.↵
        2. Lander ES ,
        3. Linton LM ,
        4. Birren B , et al
        . Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001;409:860–921.
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      12. 12.↵
        2. Gemenetzi M ,
        3. Yang Y ,
        4. Lotery AJ
        . Current concepts on primary open-angle glaucoma genetics: a contribution to disease pathophysiology and future treatment. Eye 2012;26:355–69.doi:10.1038/eye.2011.309
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      13. 13.↵
        2. Black JRM ,
        3. Clark SJ
        . Age-related macular degeneration: genome-wide association studies to translation. Genetics in Medicine 2016;18:283–9.doi:10.1038/gim.2015.70
        OpenUrl
      14. 14.↵
        2. Fritsche LG ,
        3. Igl W ,
        4. Bailey JNC , et al
        . A large genome-wide association study of age-related macular degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants. Nat Genet 2016;48:134–43.doi:10.1038/ng.3448
        OpenUrlPubMed
      15. 15.↵
        2. Ottman R
        . Gene-environment interaction: definitions and study designs. Prev Med 1996;25:764–70.doi:10.1006/pmed.1996.0117
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      16. 16.↵
        2. Tan Y-D ,
        3. Fornage M ,
        4. George V , et al
        . Parent–child pair design for detecting gene–environment interactions in complex diseases. Hum Genet 2007;121:745–57.doi:10.1007/s00439-007-0369-4
        OpenUrlPubMed
      17. 17.↵
        2. Song JW ,
        3. Chung KC
        . Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2234–42.doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44abc
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      18. 18.↵
        2. Collins FS
        . The case for a US prospective cohort study of genes and environment. Nature 2004;429:475–7.doi:10.1038/nature02628
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      19. 19.↵
        2. Manolio TA ,
        3. Bailey-Wilson JE ,
        4. Collins FS
        . Genes, environment and the value of prospective cohort studies. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:812–20.doi:10.1038/nrg1919
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      20. 20.↵
        2. Sudlow C ,
        3. Gallacher J ,
        4. Allen N , et al
        . UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001779.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      21. 21.↵
        2. Allen N ,
        3. Sudlow C ,
        4. Downey P , et al
        . UK Biobank: Current status and what it means for epidemiology. Health Policy Technol 2012;1:123–6.doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2012.07.003
        OpenUrlCrossRef
      22. 22.↵
        . UK Biobank. 2018. updated 2018. Available from: http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/
      23. 23.↵
        2. Bycroft C ,
        3. Freeman C ,
        4. Petkova D , et al
        . Genome-wide genetic data on ~500,000 UK Biobank participants. bioRxiv, 2017.
      24. 24.↵
        2. Miller KL ,
        3. Alfaro-Almagro F ,
        4. Bangerter NK , et al
        . Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nat Neurosci 2016;19:1523–36.doi:10.1038/nn.4393
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      25. 25.↵
        2. Standard B
        . Test charts for determining distance visual acuity: BS 4274-1968: London British Standards Institute, 1968.
      26. 26.↵
        2. Cumberland PM ,
        3. Bao Y ,
        4. Hysi PG , et al
        . Frequency and distribution of refractive error in adult life: Methodology and findings of the UK biobank study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139780.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139780
      27. 27.↵
        2. Luce DA
        . Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 2005;31:156–62.doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044
        OpenUrl
      28. 28.↵
        2. Garcia-Porta N ,
        3. Fernandes P ,
        4. Queiros A , et al
        . Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques. ISRN Ophthalmol 2014;2014:1–19.doi:10.1155/2014/724546
        OpenUrl
      29. 29.↵
        2. Medeiros FA ,
        3. Weinreb RN
        . Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma 2006;15:364–70.doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000212268.42606.97
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      30. 30.↵
        2. Patel PJ ,
        3. Foster PJ ,
        4. Grossi CM , et al
        . Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging in 67 321 adults: Associations with macular thickness in the UK Biobank study. Ophthalmology 2016;123:829–40.
        OpenUrl
      31. 31.↵
        . Topcon. Optical Coherence Tomography 3D OCT-1000
      32. 32.↵
        2. Desai P ,
        3. Minassian DC ,
        4. Reidy A , et al
        . Number of incident cases of the main eye diseases of ageing in the UK Biobank cohort, projected over a 25-year period from time of recruitment. Br J Ophthalmol 2018:1–5.
      33. 33.↵
        2. Guggenheim JA ,
        3. Williams C
        . UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium. Role of Educational Exposure in the Association Between Myopia and Birth Order. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133:1408–14.doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3556
        OpenUrl
      34. 34.↵
        2. Rudnicka AR ,
        3. Owen CG ,
        4. Richards M , et al
        . Effect of breastfeeding and sociodemographic factors on visual outcome in childhood and adolescence. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:1392–9.doi:10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1392
        OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      35. 35.↵
        2. Guggenheim JA ,
        3. McMahon G ,
        4. Northstone K , et al
        . Birth order and myopia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013;20:375–84.doi:10.3109/09286586.2013.848457
        OpenUrl
      36. 36.↵
        2. Ko F ,
        3. Muthy ZA ,
        4. Gallacher J , et al
        . Association of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning With Current and Future Cognitive Decline: A Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:1198-1205.doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1578
        OpenUrl
      37. 37.↵
        2. Poplin R ,
        3. Varadarajan AV ,
        4. Blumer K , et al
        . Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng 2018;2:158–64.doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0195-0
        OpenUrl
      38. 38.↵
        World Health Organization. Prevention of blindness and visual impairment. http://www.who.int/blindness/causes/en/
      39. 39.↵
        2. Clemons TE ,
        3. Milton RC ,
        4. Klein R , et al
        . 3rd. Risk factors for the incidence of Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) AREDS report no. 19. Ophthalmology 2005;112:533–9.
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      40. 40.↵
        2. Heiba IM ,
        3. Elston RC ,
        4. Klein BEK , et al
        . Sibling correlations and segregation analysis of age-related maculopathy: The beaver dam eye study. Genet Epidemiol 1994;11:51–67.doi:10.1002/gepi.1370110106
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      41. 41.↵
        2. Klaver CC ,
        3. Wolfs RC ,
        4. Assink JJ , et al
        . Genetic risk of age-related maculopathy. Population-based familial aggregation study. Archives of ophthalmology 1998;116:1646–51.
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      42. 42.↵
        2. Schaumberg DA ,
        3. Hankinson SE ,
        4. Guo Q , et al
        . A prospective study of 2 major age-related macular degeneration susceptibility alleles and interactions with modifiable risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:55–62.doi:10.1001/archopht.125.1.55
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      43. 43.↵
        2. Hattersley AT ,
        3. McCarthy MI
        . What makes a good genetic association study?. Lancet 2005;366:1315–23.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67531-9
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      44. 44.↵
        2. Weih LM ,
        3. Nanjan M ,
        4. McCarty CA , et al
        . Prevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma: results from the visual impairment project. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1966–72.doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00799-0
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      45. 45.↵
        2. Mitchell P ,
        3. Smith W ,
        4. Attebo K , et al
        . Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1661–9.
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      46. 46.↵
        2. Tielsch JM ,
        3. Sommer A ,
        4. Katz J , et al
        . Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369–74.
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      47. 47.↵
        2. Klein BE ,
        3. Klein R ,
        4. Sponsel WE , et al
        . Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1992;99:1499–504.
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      48. 48.↵
        2. Chua J ,
        3. Baskaran M ,
        4. Ong PG , et al
        . Prevalence, risk factors, and visual features of undiagnosed glaucoma: The singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133:938–46.doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1478
        OpenUrl
      49. 49.↵
        2. Vijaya L ,
        3. George R ,
        4. Baskaran M , et al
        . Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:648–54.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.062
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      50. 50.↵
        2. Song W ,
        3. Shan L ,
        4. Cheng F , et al
        . Prevalence of glaucoma in a rural northern china adult population: a population-based survey in kailu county, inner mongolia. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1982–8.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.050
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      51. 51.↵
        2. Varma R ,
        3. Mohanty SA ,
        4. Deneen J , et al
        . Burden and predictors of undetected eye disease in Mexican-Americans: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Med Care 2008;46:497–506.doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31816080fe
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      52. 52.↵
        2. Chua J ,
        3. Lim B ,
        4. Fenwick EK , et al
        . Prevalence, risk factors, and impact of undiagnosed visually significant cataract: The singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0170804.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170804
      53. 53.↵
        2. Linton KL ,
        3. Klein BE ,
        4. Klein R
        . The validity of self-reported and surrogate-reported cataract and age-related macular degeneration in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:1438–46.doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116049
        OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
      54. 54.↵
        2. Klein R ,
        3. Klein BE ,
        4. Moss SE , et al
        . The validity of a survey question to study diabetic retinopathy. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:104–10.doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114353
        OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
      55. 55.↵
        2. Patty L ,
        3. Wu C ,
        4. Torres M , et al
        . Validity of self-reported eye disease and treatment in a population-based study: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1725–30.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.029
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      56. 56.↵
        2. Shweikh Y ,
        3. Ko F ,
        4. Chan MP , et al
        . Measures of socioeconomic status and self-reported glaucoma in the U.K. Biobank cohort. Eye 2015;29:1360–7.doi:10.1038/eye.2015.157
        OpenUrl
      57. 57.↵
        2. Wensor MD ,
        3. McCarty CA ,
        4. Stanislavsky YL , et al
        . The prevalence of glaucoma in the melbourne visual impairment project. Ophthalmology 1998;105:733–9.doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)94031-3
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      58. 58.↵
        2. Bonomi L ,
        3. Marchini G ,
        4. Marraffa M , et al
        . Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology 1998;105:209–15.doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)92665-3
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      59. 59.↵
        2. Patton N ,
        3. Aslam T ,
        4. Macgillivray T , et al
        . Retinal vascular image analysis as a potential screening tool for cerebrovascular disease: a rationale based on homology between cerebral and retinal microvasculatures. J Anat 2005;206:319–48.doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00395.x
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      60. 60.↵
        2. London A ,
        3. Benhar I ,
        4. Schwartz M
        . The retina as a window to the brain-from eye research to CNS disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:44–53.doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.227
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      61. 61.↵
        2. Welikala RA ,
        3. Foster PJ ,
        4. Whincup PH , et al
        . Automated arteriole and venule classification using deep learning for retinal images from the UK Biobank cohort. Comput Biol Med 2017;90:23–32.doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.005
        OpenUrl
      62. 62.↵
        2. Klein R ,
        3. Knudtson MD ,
        4. Lee KE , et al
        . The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy XXIII: the twenty-five-year incidence of macular edema in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology 2009;116:497–503.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.016
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      63. 63.↵
        2. Joachim N ,
        3. Mitchell P ,
        4. Burlutsky G , et al
        . The incidence and progression of age-related macular degeneration over 15 years: The blue mountains eye study. Ophthalmology 2015;122:2482–9.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.002
        OpenUrl
      64. 64.↵
        2. Kanthan GL ,
        3. Wang JJ ,
        4. Rochtchina E , et al
        . Ten-year incidence of age-related cataract and cataract surgery in an older Australian population. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:808–14.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.008
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      65. 65.↵
        2. Klein BE ,
        3. Howard KP ,
        4. Lee KE , et al
        . The relationship of cataract and cataract extraction to age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1628–33.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.050
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      66. 66.↵
        2. Chan MPY ,
        3. Broadway DC ,
        4. Khawaja AP , et al
        . Glaucoma and intraocular pressure in EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study: cross sectional study. BMJ 2017;358:j3889.doi:10.1136/bmj.j3889
        OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      67. 67.↵
        2. Varma R ,
        3. Chung J ,
        4. Foong AW , et al
        . Four-year incidence and progression of visual impairment in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:713–27.doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.011
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      68. 68.↵
        2. Choudhury F ,
        3. Varma R ,
        4. Klein R , et al
        . Age-related macular degeneration and quality of life in latinos: The los angeles latino eye study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016;134:683–90.doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0794
        OpenUrl
      69. 69.↵
        2. You QS ,
        3. Xu L ,
        4. Yang H , et al
        . Five-year incidence of visual impairment and blindness in adult Chinese the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1069–75.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.032
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      70. 70.↵
        2. Wang YX ,
        3. Xu L ,
        4. Yang H , et al
        . Prevalence of glaucoma in North China: the Beijing Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:917–24.doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.037
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      71. 71.↵
        2. Foong AW ,
        3. Saw SM ,
        4. Loo JL , et al
        . Rationale and methodology for a population-based study of eye diseases in Malay people: The Singapore Malay eye study (SiMES). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2007;14:25–35.doi:10.1080/09286580600878844
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      72. 72.↵
        2. Rosman M ,
        3. Zheng Y ,
        4. Wong W , et al
        . Singapore Malay Eye Study: rationale and methodology of 6-year follow-up study (SiMES-2). Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;40:557–68.doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02763.x
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      73. 73.↵
        2. Gao J ,
        3. Liang Y ,
        4. Wang F , et al
        . Retinal vessels change in primary angle-closure glaucoma: the Handan Eye Study. Sci Rep 2015;5:9585.doi:10.1038/srep09585
        OpenUrl
      74. 74.↵
        2. Wang FH ,
        3. Liang YB ,
        4. Zhang F , et al
        . Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in rural China: the Handan Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:461–7.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.003
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      75. 75.↵
        2. Ramakrishnan R ,
        3. Nirmalan PK ,
        4. Krishnadas R , et al
        . Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1484–90.doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00564-5
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      76. 76.↵
        2. Cheung N ,
        3. Mitchell P ,
        4. Wong TY
        . Diabetic retinopathy. The Lancet 2010;376:124–36.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62124-3
        OpenUrlCrossRef
      77. 77.↵
        2. Baker ML ,
        3. Hand PJ ,
        4. Wang JJ , et al
        . Retinal signs and stroke: revisiting the link between the eye and brain. Stroke 2008;39:1371–9.doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496091
        OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      78. 78.↵
        2. Cheung CY ,
        3. Tay WT ,
        4. Ikram MK , et al
        . Retinal microvascular changes and risk of stroke: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Stroke 2013;44:2402–8.
        OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      79. 79.↵
        2. Ikram MK ,
        3. de Jong FJ ,
        4. Bos MJ , et al
        . Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology 2006;66:1339–43.doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000210533.24338.ea
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      80. 80.↵
        2. Wong T ,
        3. Mitchell P
        . The eye in hypertension. The Lancet 2007;369:425–35.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60198-6
        OpenUrl
      81. 81.↵
        2. McGeechan K ,
        3. Liew G ,
        4. Macaskill P , et al
        . Meta-analysis: retinal vessel caliber and risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:404–13.doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-00005
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      82. 82.↵
        2. Lee JY ,
        3. Ahn J ,
        4. Kim TW , et al
        . Optical coherence tomography in Parkinson’s disease: is the retina a biomarker? J Parkinsons Dis 2014;4:197–204.doi:10.3233/JPD-130306
        OpenUrlPubMed
      83. 83.↵
        2. Coppola G ,
        3. Di Renzo A ,
        4. Ziccardi L , et al
        . Optical coherence tomography in alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0134750.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134750
      84. 84.↵
        2. Garcia-Martin E ,
        3. Ara JR ,
        4. Martin J , et al
        . Retinal and optic nerve degeneration in patients with multiple sclerosis followed up for 5 Years. Ophthalmology 2017;124:688–96.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.005
        OpenUrl
      85. 85.↵
        2. Cheung CY ,
        3. Ong YT ,
        4. Hilal S , et al
        . Retinal ganglion cell analysis using high -definition optical coherence tomography in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2015;45:45–56.doi:10.3233/JAD-141659
        OpenUrlPubMed
      86. 86.↵
        2. Cunha LP ,
        3. Lopes LC ,
        4. Costa-Cunha LV , et al
        . Macular thickness measurements with frequency domain-oct for quantification of retinal neural loss and its correlation with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153830.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153830
      87. 87.↵
        2. Ferrari L ,
        3. Huang SC ,
        4. Magnani G , et al
        . Optical coherence tomography reveals retinal neuroaxonal thinning in frontotemporal dementia as in alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2017;56:1101–7.doi:10.3233/JAD-160886
        OpenUrl
      88. 88.↵
        2. Ascaso FJ ,
        3. Cruz N ,
        4. Modrego PJ , et al
        . Retinal alterations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: an optical coherence tomography study. J Neurol 2014;261:1522–30.doi:10.1007/s00415-014-7374-z
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      89. 89.↵
        2. Garcia-Martin E ,
        3. Satue M ,
        4. Fuertes I , et al
        . Ability and reproducibility of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography to detect retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy in Parkinson’s disease. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2161–7.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.003
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      90. 90.↵
        2. Cunha LP ,
        3. Almeida AL ,
        4. Costa-Cunha LV , et al
        . The role of optical coherence tomography in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Retina Vitreous 2016;2:24.doi:10.1186/s40942-016-0049-4
        OpenUrl
      91. 91.↵
        2. Ikram MA ,
        3. Brusselle GGO ,
        4. Murad SD , et al
        . The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results. Eur J Epidemiol 2017;32:807–50.doi:10.1007/s10654-017-0321-4
        OpenUrl
      92. 92.↵
        2. Höhn R ,
        3. Kottler U ,
        4. Peto T , et al
        . The ophthalmic branch of the Gutenberg Health Study: study design, cohort profile and self-reported diseases. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120476.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120476
      93. 93.↵
        2. Zhao D ,
        3. Kim MH ,
        4. Pastor-Barriuso R , et al
        . A longitudinal study of age-related changes in intraocular pressure: the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:6244–50.doi:10.1167/iovs.14-14151
        OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      94. 94.↵
        2. Zhao D ,
        3. Kim MH ,
        4. Pastor-Barriuso R , et al
        . A longitudinal study of association between adiposity markers and intraocular pressure: The kangbuk samsung health study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0146057.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146057
      95. 95.↵
        2. Chen Z ,
        3. Chen J ,
        4. Collins R , et al
        . China Kadoorie Biobank of 0.5 million people: survey methods, baseline characteristics and long-term follow-up. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:1652–66.doi:10.1093/ije/dyr120
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      96. 96.↵
        2. Patel AV ,
        3. Jacobs EJ ,
        4. Dudas DM , et al
        . The american cancer society’s Cancer Prevention study 3 (CPS-3): Recruitment, study design, and baseline characteristics. Cancer 2017;123:2014–24.doi:10.1002/cncr.30561
        OpenUrl
      97. 97.↵
        2. Ouellette S ,
        3. Tassé AM
        . P(3)G - 10 years of toolbuilding: From the population biobank to the clinic. Appl Transl Genom 2014;3:36–40.doi:10.1016/j.atg.2014.04.004
        OpenUrl
      98. 98.↵
        National Cancer institute Cohort Consortium. 2017. Available from: https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/Consortia/cohort.html
      99. 99.↵
        2. Psaty BM ,
        3. O’Donnell CJ ,
        4. Gudnason V , et al
        . CHARGE Consortium. Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium: Design of prospective meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies from 5 cohorts. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009;2:73–80.doi:10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.829747
        OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      100. 100.↵
        2. Bovenberg JA
        . Property rights in blood, genes & data naturally yours? Portland: Ringgold Inc, 2006.
      101. 101.↵
        2. Willett WC ,
        3. Blot WJ ,
        4. Colditz GA , et al
        . Merging and emerging cohorts: not worth the wait. Nature 2007;445:257–8.doi:10.1038/445257a
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      102. 102.↵
        2. Collins FS ,
        3. Manolio TA
        . Merging and emerging cohorts: necessary but not sufficient. Nature 2007;445:259.doi:10.1038/445259a
      103. 103.↵
        UK Biobank. Access Procedures: application and review procedures for access to the UK Biobank Resource. http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/resources/

      Footnotes

      • Contributors SYLC had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: NA, AL, CS, PTK and PJF. Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data: SYLC, DT, NA, AL, PD, PP, ZM, CS, TP, PTK and PJF. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Obtained funding: CS, PP, PTK, PJF and UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium. All authors read and critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

      • Funding The UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium is supported by grants from Moorfields Eye Charity, The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (BRC2_009) and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology and the Alcon Research Institute.

      • Disclaimer No funders had a direct role in the collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; nor in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

      • Competing interests This analysis was supported by the Eranda Foundation via the International Glaucoma Association in the design and conduct of the study. The UCL ORS and GRS programmes provided scholarship support for ZM, PTK, PJF, and PP and SYLC received salary support from the NIHR BRC at Moorfields Eye Hospital. PJF received support from the Richard Desmond Charitable Trust, via Fight for Sight, London. PJF reports personal fees from Allergan, Carl Zeiss, Google/DeepMind and Santen, a grant from Alcon, outside the submitted work.

      • Patient consent Obtained.

      • Ethics approval The North West Multi-center Research Ethics Committee approved the study (reference no., 06/MRE08/65), in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Detailed information about the study is available at the UK Biobank web site (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/).

      • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

      • Data sharing statement This research used data from the UK Biobank Resource, under data access request number 2112.

      • Collaborators UK Biobank Eye & Vision Consortium: The UK Biobank Eye & Vision Consortium members are Tariq Aslam, PhD, Manchester University, Sarah A. Barman, PhD, Kingston University, Jenny H. Barrett, PhD, University of Leeds, Paul Bishop, PhD, Manchester University, Peter Blows, BSc, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Catey Bunce, DSc, King’s College London, Roxana O. Carare, PhD, University of Southampton, Usha Chakravarthy, FRCOphth, Queens University Belfast, Michelle Chan, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Sharon Y.L. Chua, PhD, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, David P. Crabb, PhD, UCL, Philippa M. Cumberland, MSc, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Alexander Day,PhD, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Parul Desai, PhD, NIHRBiomedical Research Centre, Bal Dhillon, FRCOphth, University ofEdinburgh, Andrew D. Dick, FRCOphth, University of Bristol, Cathy Egan, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Sarah Ennis, PhD,University of Southampton, Paul Foster, PhD, NIHR Biomedical ResearchCentre, Marcus Fruttiger, PhD, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John E.J. Gallacher, PhD, University of Oxford, David F. GARWAY-HEATH MD FRCOphth - NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Jane Gibson, PhD, University of Southampton, Dan Gore, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Jeremy A. Guggenheim, PhD, Cardiff University, Chris J. Hammond, FRCOphth, King’s College London, Alison Hardcastle, PhD,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Simon P. Harding, MD, University of Liverpool, Ruth E. Hogg, PhD, Queens University Belfast, Pirro Hysi, PhD, King’s College London, Pearse A. Keane, MD, NIHR, Biomedical Research Centre, Sir Peng T. Khaw, PhD, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Anthony P. Khawaja, DPhil, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Gerassimos Lascaratos, PhD, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, AndrewJ. Lotery, MD, University of Southampton, TomMacGillivray, PhD,University of Edinburgh, Sarah Mackie, PhD, University of Leeds, Keith Martin, FRCOphth, University of Cambridge, Michelle McGaughey,Queen’s University Belfast, Bernadette McGuinness, PhD, Queen’sUniversity Belfast, Gareth J. McKay, PhD, Queen’s University Belfast, Martin McKibbin, FRCOphth, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Danny Mitry, PhD, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Tony Moore, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, James E. Morgan, DPhil, Cardiff University, Zaynah A. Muthy, BSc, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Eoin O’Sullivan, MD, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust,Chris G. Owen, PhD, University of London, Praveen Patel, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Euan Paterson, BSc, Queens University Belfast, Tunde Peto, PhD, Queen’s University Belfast, Axel Petzold, PhD, UCL, Jugnoo S. Rahi, PhD, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Alicja R. Rudnikca, PhD, University ofLondon, Jay Self, PhD, University of Southampton, Sobha Sivaprasad, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, David Steel, FRCOphth, Newcastle University, Irene Stratton, MSc, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nicholas Strouthidis, PhD, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Cathie Sudlow, DPhil, University of Edinburgh, Dhanes Thomas, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Emanuele Trucco, PhD, University of Dundee, Adnan Tufail, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Veronique Vitart, PhD, University of Edinburgh, Stephen A. Vernon, DM, Nottingham University Hospitals NHSTrust, Ananth C. Viswanathan, FRCOphth, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Cathy Williams, PhD, University of Bristol, Katie Williams, PhD, King’s College London, Jayne V. Woodside, MRCOphth, PhD, Queen’s University Belfast, Max M. Yates, PhD, University of East Anglia, Jennifer Yip, PhD, University of Cambridge, and Yalin Zheng, PhD, University of Liverpool.