Background People who are prescribed self administered medications typically take only
about half their prescribed doses. Efforts to assist patients with adherence to medications …

Objective To compare the effects of treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19).
Design Living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources WHO covid-19 …

Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in
review currency, accuracy, and utility. We are developing a novel approach to systematic …

Accurate information regarding prognosis is fundamental to optimal clinical care. The best
approach to assess patient prognosis relies on prediction models that simultaneously …

This living guideline by Arnav Agarwal and colleagues (BMJ 2020; 370: m3379, doi:
10.1136/bmj. m3379) was last updated on 22 April 2022, but the infographic contained two …

Methods In developing this guideline, the steering committee followed standards for
trustworthy guidelines. 15 We included innovative approaches for key standards such as …

Updates This is the fourteenth version (thirteenth update) of the living guideline, replacing
earlier versions (available as data supplements). New recommendations will be published …

Observational studies almost always have bias because prognostic factors are unequally
distributed between patients exposed or not exposed to an intervention. The standard …

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing to
screen for prostate cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources …

Clinical decisions should be based on the totality of the best evidence and not the results of
individual studies. When clinicians apply the results of a systematic review or meta-analysis …