Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;74(3):629-45. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.629.

Abstract

Three experiments tested and extended recent theory regarding motivational influences on impression formation (S. T. Fiske & S. L. Neuberg, 1990; J. L. Hilton & J. M. Darley, 1991) in the context of an impression management dilemma that women face: Self-promotion may be instrumental for managing a competent impression, yet women who self-promote may suffer social reprisals for violating gender prescriptions to be modest. Experiment 1 investigated the influence of perceivers' goals on processes that inhibit stereotypical thinking, and reactions to counterstereotypical behavior. Experiments 2-3 extended these findings by including male targets. For female targets, self-promotion led to higher competence ratings but incurred social attraction and hireability costs unless perceivers were outcome-dependent males. For male targets, self-effacement decreased competence and hireability ratings, though its effects on social attraction were inconsistent.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Communication
  • Competitive Behavior
  • Defense Mechanisms
  • Female
  • Gender Identity*
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Male
  • Motivation
  • Personnel Selection
  • Self Concept*
  • Social Desirability
  • Social Perception*
  • Stereotyping*
  • Students / psychology