A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 May;87(5):408-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04569.x.

Abstract

A randomised prospective study of 407 primiparous patients compared the consequences of midline and mediolateral episiotomies. The patients' estimates of the pain from their episiotomies were similar. Anal sphincter injury was significantly more common after a midline procedure but no rectovaginal fistulae occurred. Scarring was less noticeable after the midline incision and intercourse began earlier.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anus Diseases / etiology
  • Cicatrix
  • Coitus
  • Episiotomy / adverse effects
  • Episiotomy / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Prospective Studies