Electrocardiographic monitoring after electrical injury: necessity or luxury

J Trauma. 1986 Feb;26(2):166-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198602000-00013.

Abstract

It has been common practice to perform routine electrocardiographic (EKG) monitoring of electrically burned patients for the first 24 hours following injury. Is this monitoring necessary, or is it a luxury based on remote probabilities? The records of 48 consecutive patients admitted with high-voltage (greater than 1,000 volts) electrical injuries were reviewed with respect to history of a cardiac event in the field, EKG abnormalities on admission, and the presence of cardiac arrhythmias during the first postinjury day. No serious arrhythmias occurred in any patients who had a normal EKG on admission. It was concluded that routine cardiac monitoring after a high-voltage injury should be individualized based on history of loss of consciousness, documentation of an arrythmia, or an abnormal EKG.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / etiology*
  • Burns, Electric / complications*
  • Burns, Electric / diagnostic imaging
  • Burns, Electric / physiopathology
  • Child
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Electrocardiography* / economics
  • Electrocardiography* / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / economics
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic* / statistics & numerical data
  • Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis
  • Myocardial Infarction / diagnostic imaging
  • Myocardial Infarction / etiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radionuclide Imaging
  • Retrospective Studies