Ceftazidime-avibactam Versus Doripenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial Program

Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 15;63(6):754-762. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw378. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Abstract

Background: The global emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae highlights the urgent need to reduce carbapenem dependence. The phase 3 RECAPTURE program compared the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam and doripenem in patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis.

Methods: Hospitalized adults with suspected or microbiologically confirmed cUTI/acute pyelonephritis were randomized 1:1 to ceftazidime-avibactam 2000 mg/500 mg every 8 hours or doripenem 500 mg every 8 hours (doses adjusted for renal function), with possible oral antibiotic switch after ≥5 days (total treatment duration up to 10 days or 14 days for patients with bacteremia).

Results: Of 1033 randomized patients, 393 and 417 treated with ceftazidime-avibactam and doripenem, respectively, were eligible for the primary efficacy analyses; 19.6% had ceftazidime-nonsusceptible baseline pathogens. Noninferiority of ceftazidime-avibactam vs doripenem was demonstrated for the US Food and Drug Administration co-primary endpoints of (1) patient-reported symptomatic resolution at day 5: 276 of 393 (70.2%) vs 276 of 417 (66.2%) patients (difference, 4.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -2.39% to 10.42%]); and (2) combined symptomatic resolution/microbiological eradication at test of cure (TOC): 280 of 393 (71.2%) vs 269 of 417 (64.5%) patients (difference, 6.7% [95% CI, .30% to 13.12%]). Microbiological eradication at TOC (European Medicines Agency primary endpoint) occurred in 304 of 393 (77.4%) ceftazidime-avibactam vs 296 of 417 (71.0%) doripenem patients (difference, 6.4% [95% CI, .33% to 12.36%]), demonstrating superiority at the 5% significance level. Both treatments showed similar efficacy against ceftazidime-nonsusceptible pathogens. Ceftazidime-avibactam had a safety profile consistent with that of ceftazidime alone.

Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam was highly effective for the empiric treatment of cUTI (including acute pyelonephritis), and may offer an alternative to carbapenems in this setting.

Clinical trials registration: NCT01595438; NCT01599806.

Keywords: acute pyelonephritis; ceftazidime-avibactam; complicated urinary tract infection.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Azabicyclo Compounds / administration & dosage
  • Azabicyclo Compounds / adverse effects
  • Azabicyclo Compounds / therapeutic use*
  • Carbapenems / administration & dosage
  • Carbapenems / adverse effects
  • Carbapenems / therapeutic use*
  • Ceftazidime / administration & dosage
  • Ceftazidime / adverse effects
  • Ceftazidime / therapeutic use*
  • Doripenem
  • Drug Combinations
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pyelonephritis / complications
  • Pyelonephritis / drug therapy*
  • Urinary Tract Infections / complications
  • Urinary Tract Infections / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Azabicyclo Compounds
  • Carbapenems
  • Drug Combinations
  • avibactam, ceftazidime drug combination
  • Ceftazidime
  • Doripenem

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01595438
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01599806