Background: To date, Doppler echocardiography is the most widespread and well-recognized technique for the noninvasive evaluation of systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). However, recent studies have reported reservations about the relevance of Doppler echocardiography or the tool's reliability in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Thus, the aim of this dedicated retrospective study was to address the questions of Doppler echocardiography's relevance and accuracy for PH diagnosis in the routine activity of a conventional echocardiography department.
Methods: Institutional databases were used to extract and analyze the records of 310 patients who underwent both hemodynamic and echocardiographic investigations within a single hospitalization period.
Results: Despite an underestimation of absolute Doppler sPAP values compared with measurements on right heart catheterization, data analysis revealed a strong correlation (r = 0.80, P < .00001, n = 310). Targeting a mean pulmonary pressure on right heart catheterization of 25 mm Hg for the definition of PH, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated a strong association between sPAP and PH diagnosis (area under the curve, 0.82; n = 155). The cutoff obtained for sPAP was 38 mm Hg, and when applied on a second-test subgroup population (n = 155), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88%, 83%, and 86%, respectively. When patients with examination intervals of <2 days were selected (n = 115), sensitivity and specificity reached 89% and 89%, respectively. No combination of parameters produced an improvement on the initial results.
Conclusions: In the real-world practice of a conventional echocardiography department, Doppler echocardiography is associated with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for PH evaluation, thus confirming its major position as a primary noninvasive tool.
Copyright © 2013 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.