Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynecologists in tertiary hospitals

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057108. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the daily work practice under the threat of defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynecologists.

Study design: A prospective cross-sectional survey of obstetricians and gynecologists working at tertiary medical centers in Israel.

Results: Among the 117 obstetricians and gynecologists who participated in the survey, representing 10% of the obstetricians and gynecologists registered by the Israel Medical Association, 113 (97%) felt that their daily work practice is influenced by concern about being sued for medical negligence and not only by genuine medical considerations. As a result, 102 (87%) physicians are more likely to offer the cesarean section option, even in the absence of a clear medical indication, 70 (60%) follow court rulings concerning medical practices, and 85 (73%) physicians mentioned that discussions about medical negligence court rulings are included in their departments' meetings.

Conclusions: Defensive medicine is a well-embedded phenomenon affecting the medical decision process of obstetricians and gynecologists.

MeSH terms

  • Cesarean Section / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Cesarean Section / statistics & numerical data
  • Defensive Medicine / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Defensive Medicine / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Gynecology / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Gynecology / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Israel
  • Legislation as Topic / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Obstetrics / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Obstetrics / statistics & numerical data*
  • Tertiary Care Centers / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Tertiary Care Centers / statistics & numerical data*
  • Workplace / statistics & numerical data

Grants and funding

These authors have no support or funding to report.