Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):347.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.019. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to assess the modern prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal tears.

Study design: The study population comprised 38,252 women who delivered in one medical center, from January 2005 through December 2009, and met the following inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery. Of these, 96 women (0.25%) sustained third- or fourth-degree perineal tears. Maternal and obstetric variables were compared between women with vs without severe perineal tears.

Results: Five variables were found to be statistically significant independent risk factors: Asian ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 8.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-18.9), primiparity (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5-3.7), persistent occipito posterior (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1-4.5), vacuum delivery (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.6), and heavier birthweight (OR, 1.001; 95% CI, 1-1.001).

Conclusion: Severe perineal tears are uncommon in modern obstetric practice. Significant risk factors are Asian ethnicity, primiparity, persistent occipito posterior, vacuum delivery, and heavier birthweight.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Asian People / statistics & numerical data
  • Birth Weight
  • Delivery, Obstetric / adverse effects*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Injury Severity Score
  • Labor Presentation
  • Lacerations / classification
  • Lacerations / epidemiology*
  • Lacerations / etiology
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Parity
  • Perineum / injuries*
  • Pregnancy
  • Prevalence
  • Risk Factors
  • Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical / adverse effects