How should we revise diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders in the DSM-V?

J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Aug;117(3):561-75. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.3.561.

Abstract

This article reviews literature on the validity and performance characteristics of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders (SUDs) and recommends changes in these criteria that should be considered for the next edition of the DSM (DSM-V). Substantial data indicate that DSM-IV substance abuse and substance dependence are not distinct categories and that SUD criteria are best modeled as reflecting a unidimensional continuum of substance-problem severity. The conceptually and empirically problematic substance abuse diagnosis should be abandoned in the DSM-V, with substance dependence defined by a single set of criteria. Data also indicate that various individual SUD criteria should be revised, dropped, or considered for inclusion in the DSM-V. The DSM-V should provide a framework that allows the integration of categorical and dimensional approaches to diagnosis. Important areas for further research are noted.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders*
  • Humans
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Substance-Related Disorders / classification
  • Substance-Related Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Terminology as Topic