General practitioners' views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Mar;25(1):15-9. doi: 10.1080/02813430600973459.

Abstract

Objective: To identify and describe general practitioners' (GPs') views on radiology reports, using plain radiography for back pain as the case.

Design: Qualitative study with three focus-group interviews analysed using Giorgi's method as modified by Malterud.

Setting: Southern Norway.

Subjects: Five female and eight male GPs aged 32-57 years who had practised for 3-15 years and were from 11 different practices.

Main outcome measures: Descriptions of GPs' views.

Results: GPs wanted radiology reports to indicate more clearly the meaning of radiological terminology, the likelihood of disease, the clinical relevance of the findings, and/or the need for further investigations. GPs stated that good referral information leads to better reports.

Conclusion: These results can help to improve communication between radiologists and GPs. The issues identified in this study could be further investigated in studies that can quantify GPs' satisfaction with radiology reports in relation to characteristics of the GP, the radiologist, and the referral information.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Back Pain / diagnostic imaging*
  • Clinical Competence
  • Family Practice
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Interdisciplinary Communication
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Medical Records / standards*
  • Middle Aged
  • Physicians, Family
  • Radiography
  • Radiology Information Systems / standards
  • Referral and Consultation / standards
  • Terminology as Topic