Intensive group cognitive treatment and individual cognitive therapy vs. treatment as usual in social phobia: a randomized controlled trial

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Feb;115(2):142-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00839.x.

Abstract

To compare the effects of an intensive group cognitive treatment (IGCT) to individual cognitive therapy (ICT) and treatment as usual (TAU) in social phobia (DSM-IV).

Method: Hundred patients were randomized to: IGCT involving 16 group sessions spread over three weeks; ICT involving 16 shorter weekly sessions in 4 months and; TAU involving an indicated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with therapy sessions as required for 1 year. The main outcome measure was a Social Phobia Composite that combined several standardized self-report measures. Diagnostic assessment was repeated at 1-year follow-up.

Results: Significant improvements were observed with all treatments. ICT was superior to IGCT and TAU, which did not differ in overall effectiveness.

Conclusion: The study confirms and extends previously reported findings that ICT is more effective than group cognitive treatment and treatment with SSRIs. IGCT lasts only 3 weeks, and is as effective as more protracted TAU.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cognition Disorders / diagnosis
  • Cognition Disorders / epidemiology
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / methods*
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Demography
  • Depression / diagnosis
  • Depression / epidemiology
  • Depression / psychology
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / methods
  • Phobic Disorders / epidemiology
  • Phobic Disorders / therapy*
  • Psychotherapy, Group / statistics & numerical data*
  • Social Perception
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome