Diagnostic hysteroscopy: a valuable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of structural intra-cavital pathology and endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma?. Six years of experience with non-clinical diagnostic hysteroscopy

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Sep 10;110(1):79-82. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00165-9.

Abstract

Objective: 1045 diagnostic hysteroscopic procedures performed throughout six consecutive years were evaluated, focussing on its value in diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma.

Design: Retrospective study performed in the gynaecological endoscopy clinic of a training hospital. Subjects were 1045 pre- and post-menopausal patients.

Results: A normal cavity was found in 54.2%. Most common abnormal findings were fibroids (21.0%) and endometrial polyps (14.4%). Hysteroscopically diagnosed hyperplasia of the endometrium was confirmed histologically in only less than half the cases. Endometrial carcinoma was suspected on hysteroscopic view in two cases of a total of seven proven cases. In three cases initially an endometrial polyp and in two cases a fibroid was diagnosed. Once the diagnosis was missed even after biopsy taking.

Conclusions: Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool in diagnosing structural intra-cavital pathology, very suitable for the outpatient clinic. The value in diagnosing hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma is limited and even after guided biopsy a malignancy cannot be ruled out.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Biopsy
  • Endometrial Hyperplasia / diagnosis*
  • Endometrial Hyperplasia / pathology
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / pathology
  • Endometrium / abnormalities
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysteroscopy*
  • Leiomyoma / diagnosis
  • Polyps / diagnosis
  • Postmenopause
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Uterine Hemorrhage
  • Uterine Neoplasms / diagnosis