Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Nov;83(8):1125-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b8.11643.

Abstract

The Oxford hip score (OHS) is a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome which is often used after total hip replacement, and the EuroQol 5D (EQ5D) is a patient-based generic questionnaire for health assessment. In an analysis of the outcome at one year of 609 revision hip replacements (RHRs), we compared the OHS and EQ5D scores, postoperative patient satisfaction and change in pain. About 25% of the operations were repeat RHRs. At one year, 57% of patients were very pleased with their operation. The correlation between preoperative and postoperative scores and change scores for the OHS and EQ5D was high. For both instruments the effect sizes were large, but the greater effect size of the OHS suggests that it is particularly sensitive to improvements after RHR. The effect scores of the OHS declined with the number of previous RHRs, while those for the EQ5D seemed less sensitive. Our results confirm the value of the OHS in assessing outcome after RHR.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*
  • Female
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care / methods*
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / surgery
  • Reoperation
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires