Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research
Intended for healthcare professionals
Issues in research Previous     Next

Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research

Joanna Smith Lecturer in children and young people’s nursing, School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Salford, UK
Hilary Bekker Senior lecturer in behavioural sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK
Francine Cheater Director, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK

For many years, discussions of the relative merits of generic and theoretical approaches to qualitative research have divided researchers while overshadowing the need to focus on addressing clinical questions. Drawing on the challenges of designing a study that explored parents’ experiences of living with children with hydrocephalus, the authors of this paper argue that over-adherence to, and deliberations about, the philosophical origins of qualitative methods is undermining the contributions qualitative research could make to evidence-based health care and suggest qualitative methods should stand alone.

Nurse Researcher. 18, 2, 39-51. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.39.c8283

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more