Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing quality of life among British older people using the ICEPOP CAPability (ICECAP-O) measure

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Investigating Choice Experiments for the Preferences of Older People (ICEPOP) programme developed a capability-based measure of general quality of life (QOL): the ICEPOP CAPability (ICECAP-O) instrument. ICECAP-O was originally intended for use in the economic evaluation of health and social care interventions, but there is increasing interest in using it to quantify differences in QOL in cross-sectional data.

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of the overall ICECAP-O scores and quantify differences in QOL associated with various factors in a multivariable regression model among residents of a British city.

Methods

ICECAP-O was administered as part of a survey of 4304 citizens of a British city. QOL values in only those respondents aged ≥65 years (n= 809) were compared across subgroups using univariable analyses and multivariable regression models.

Results

QOL values were associated with differences in responses to a variety of questions about respondents’ socioeconomic status, locality, contact with others, participation, health and social support. Multivariable regression results showed that poor physical and psychological health were associated with 4–7% lower QOL. Living alone and infrequent socializing were each associated with an approximately 2.5% impairment in QOL. Feeling unsafe after dark was associated with an 8% impairment, whilst those without a faith experienced 5% lower QOL on average. Distribution of ICECAP-O values by electoral ward enabled the identification of areas of deprivation, although the associations were strong only for enjoyment and control.

Conclusion

ICECAP-O provides policy makers with robust quantitative evidence of differences in QOL. It offers local government an opportunity to evaluate the effects of health and other interventions, and to make comparisons across sectors for which it is responsible. It also demonstrates good ability to compare impairments in QOL associated with sociodemographic, health and attitudinal variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II
Fig. 2
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Areas in receipt of additional funding.

  2. The 2007 IMD ranges from 0.4 to 85.5 and is a measure of overall deprivation across a range of domainspecific scores.

  3. The 2007 IDAOPI ranges from 0.0 to 1.0 and measures income deprivation among older adults.

References

  1. Grewal I, Lewis J, Flynn TN, et al. Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: preferences or capabilities? Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 1891–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. University of Birmingham. ICECAP capability measures [online]. Available from URL: http://www.icecap.bham.ac.uk/ [Accessed 2011 Jul 22]

  3. Sen A. Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hyde M, Wiggins RD, Higgs P, et al. A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging Ment Health 2003; 7(3): 186–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Higgs P, Hyde M, Wiggins RD, et al. Researching quality of life in early old age: the importance of the sociological dimension. Soc Pol Admin 2003; 37(3): 239–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67(5): 874–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coast J, Peters TJ, Natarajan L, et al. An assessment of the construct validity of the descriptive system for the ICECAP capability measure for older people. Qual Life Res 2008; 17: 967–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait J. Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, et al. Best-worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ 2007; 26(1): 171–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marley AAJ, Flynn TN, Louviere JJ. Probabilistic models of set-dependent and attribute-level best-worst choice. J Math Psychol 2008; 52: 281–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M. Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J Econ Psychol 2008; 29: 94–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown J, Bowling A, Flynn TN. Models of quality of life: a taxonomy, overview and systematic review of the literature. European Forum on Population Ageing Research/ European Group on Quality of Life Extending quality of life in old age (EQUAL). 2004 May [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ageingresearch.group.shef.ac.uk/pdf/qol_review_complete.pdf [Accessed 2011 Jul 22]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Department for Communities and Local Government. Indices of deprivation 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/neighbourhoodrenewal/deprivation/deprivation07/ [Accessed 2011 Jul 22]

    Google Scholar 

  14. South West Public Health Observatory. Datasets to support joint strategic needs assessment: local authority and county data [online]. Available from URL: http://www.swpho.nhs.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID=35709 [Accessed 2011 Jul 22]

  15. South West Public Health Observatory. Index of multiple deprivation 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.swpho.nhs.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID=35683 [Accessed 2011 Jul 22]

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coast J, Peters TJ, Inglis A. Factors associated with inappropriate emergency hospital admission in the UK. Int J Qual Health Care 1996; 8(1): 31–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel RR, Peters TJ, Murphy DJ, ALSPAC Study Team. Prenatal risk factors for caesarian section: analysis of the ALSPAC cohort of 12944 women in England. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34(2): 353–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters TJ, Somerset M, Campbell R, et al. Variables associated with attendance at, and the perceived helpfulness of, meetings for people with multiple sclerosis. Health Soc Care Community 2003; 11(1): 19–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherriff A, Peters TJ, Henderson J, et al. Risk factor associations with wheezing patterns in children followed longitudinally from birth to 3 1/2 years. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30(6): 1473–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med 2001; 33(5): 328–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Janabi H, Coast J, Flynn TN. What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67: 111–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harris P. The misunderstood caregiver? A qualitative study of the male caregiver of Alzheimer’s disease victims. Gerontologist 1993; 33(4): 551–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. Epub 2011 May 20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all those who participated in the survey, members of the Bristol Partnership who funded the survey and Bristol City Council’s Quality of Life team. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry N. Flynn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flynn, T.N., Chan, P., Coast, J. et al. Assessing quality of life among British older people using the ICEPOP CAPability (ICECAP-O) measure. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9, 317–329 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11594150-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11594150-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation