Chest
Volume 120, Issue 6, Supplement, December 2001, Pages 425S-437S
Journal home page for Chest

Trials Comparing Alternative Weaning Modes and Discontinuation Assessments

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.6_suppl.425SGet rights and content

We identified 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of methods for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation, 8 of which were trials of discontinuation assessment strategies, 5 of which were trials of stepwise reduction in mechanical ventilatory support, and 3 of which were trials comparing alternative ventilation modes for weaning periods lasting < 48 h. We found that different thresholds for deciding when a patient is ready for a trial of spontaneous breathing, different criteria for a successful trial, and different thresholds for extubation may overwhelm the impact of alternative ventilation strategies. Nevertheless, the results of these studies suggest the possibility that multiple daily T-piece weaning or pressure support may be superior to synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Other RCTs suggest that early extubation with the back-up institution of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as needed may be a useful strategy in selected patients.

Section snippets

Eligibility Criteria

Our methodology is reported in detail elsewhere in this supplement. For the reviews in this section, we focused on strategies that were designed to facilitate weaning and extubation that involved alternative regimens of assessing suitability for weaning or extubation or alternative strategies for ventilating patients during the weaning process. We excluded studies that reported exclusively physiologic outcomes. We included randomized trials and observational studies that included a control

Results

We identified 16 randomized trials, 15 through MEDLINE and 1 through Excerpta Medica Database.15161718192021222324252627282930 One set of trials deals with the decision about what mode of ventilation to use to test the patient's ability to tolerate unassisted breathing. Of the 16 randomized trials, 8 trials1516171819202122 dealt with this choice. We refer to this group of studies as “studies comparing alternative discontinuation assessment strategies.”

In the second clinical context that we

Discussion

These trials have made important observations that are relevant to the care of patients receiving mechanical ventilation, and they represent one of the most well-studied fields in critical-care medicine. We begin with an observation that is applicable to all trials of alternative ventilation modes. A major outcome of these studies of modes of weaning is weaning failure and, in particular, the need for reintubation. While the need for reintubation is important, it is prior to reintubation that

References (35)

  • KF Schulz et al.

    Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • S Goodnough-Hanneman

    Predictors of weaning from mechanical ventilation [abstract]

    Heart Lung

    (1992)
  • S Nava et al.

    Weaning and outcome from mechanical ventilation

    Monaldi Arch Chest Dis

    (1994)
  • E Zanotti et al.

    Elevated static compliance of the total respiratory system: early predictor of weaning unsuccess in severed COPD patients mechanically ventilated

    Intensive Care Med

    (1995)
  • HS Goodnough

    Multidimensional predictors of success or failure with early weaning from mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery

    Nurs Res

    (1994)
  • S Nava et al.

    Survival and prediction of successful ventilator weaning in COPD patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 21 days

    Eur Respir J

    (1994)
  • MA Chaney et al.

    Pulmonary effects of methylprednisolone in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and early tracheal extubation

    Anesth Analg

    (1998)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Mechanical ventilation in the cardiac care unit

      2010, Cardiac Intensive Care: Expert Consult
    • Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation: What Monitoring Matters?

      2007, Critical Care Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      We specifically use the verb “clarify” versus “answer” definitively because, considered pathophysiologically, no single threshold is likely to demarcate perfectly success and failure in every patient. Nearly all studies and reviews published to date have suggested patients should be “hemodynamically stable” before weaning [4–6,9]. Accordingly, measures of hemodynamic stability including blood pressure and absence of cardiac ischemia have been those most often cited as prerequisites for studies and clinical guidelines.

    • Implementation of a weaning algorithm in postoperative cardiac ICU: simple enough to be implemented in a ventilator software<sup>{star, open}</sup>{star, open}La version complète de l'article est disponible sur ScienceDirect<sup>®</sup>, www.sciencedirect.com, doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.02.002.

      2007, Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our study is in line with fast-tracking strategy, implemented in most cardiosurgical ICUs. This strategy favours short-acting anaesthetic agents like remifentanil and weaning protocols aiming at reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation [9,10]. However, remifentanil may trigger hyperalgesia [11] and therefore many groups, like ours, still use long-acting sufentanil.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This article is based on work performed by the McMaster University Evidence-based Practice Center, under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Contract No. 290-97-0017), Rockville, MD.

    View full text