Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Safety and Outcomes in Outpatient versus Inpatient Thyroidectomy using the NSQIP: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 16,370 Patients

  • Endocrine Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With increasing economic healthcare constraints and an evolving understanding of patient selection criteria and patient safety, outpatient thyroidectomy is now more frequently employed. However, robust statistical analyses evaluating outcomes and safety after outpatient thyroidectomy with matched comparisons to inpatient cohorts are lacking.

Methods

The 2011-2012 NSQIP datasets were queried to identify all patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Inpatient and outpatient procedures cohorts were matched 1:1 using propensity score analysis to assess outcomes. Outcomes of interest included surgical and medical complications, reoperation, mortality, and readmission. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to identify predictors of these events. Relative risk ratios were calculated for adverse events between inpatient and outpatient cohorts.

Results

In total, 21,508 patients were identified to have undergone a thyroidectomy in 2011–2012. Inpatients and outpatients were matched 1:1 with respect to preoperative and operative characteristics, leaving 8,185 patients in each treatment arm. After matching, overall 30-day morbidity was rare with only 250 patients (1.53 %) experiencing any perioperative morbidity. 476 patients (2.91 %) were readmitted within 30-days of the operation. Both pre- and post-matching, inpatient thyroidectomy was associated with increased risks of readmission, reoperation, and any complication.

Conclusions

Based on this comprehensive population-based study, outpatient thyroidectomy appears to be at least as safe as inpatient thyroidectomy. However, there are still differences in outcomes between inpatient and outpatient cohorts, despite statistical matching of preoperative and intraoperative variables. Future research needs to be spent identifying these as-of-yet unknown risk factors to resolve this discrepancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hockenberry JM, Burgess JF Jr, Glasgow J, et al. Cost of readmission: can the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) experience inform national payment policy?. Med Care. 2013;51(1):13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare Fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1418–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Orszag PR, Emanuel EJ. Health care reform and cost control. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:601–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. A path to bundled payment around a rehospitalization. Report to the Congress: reforming the delivery system. Washington, DC, 2005:83–103.

  5. Application of incentives to reduce avoidable readmissions to hospitals. Fed Regist. 2008;73:23673–7.

  6. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Readmission Reduction Program. Web http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program.html (2013). Accessed 30 Jan 2013.

  7. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pub. L. No, 111-148 § 3025(a), 124 Stat. 119,408 (2010).

  8. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Programs, 76 Fed. Reg. 51663 (Aug 18, 2011).

  9. Fontanaros PB, McNutt RA. Revisiting hospital readmissions. JAMA. 2013;309(4):398–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McCarthy D, Johnson MB, Auget AM. Recasting readmissions by placing the hospital role in community context. JAMA. 2013;309(4):351–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaduganathan M, Bonow RO, Gheorghiade M. Thirty-day readmissions: the clock is ticking. JAMA. 2013;309(4):345–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Joynt KE, Jha AK. Characteristics of hospitals receiving penalties under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. JAMA. 2013;309(4):342–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Snyder SK, Roberson CR, Cummings CC, Rajab MH. Local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care vs general anesthesia in thyroidectomy: a randomized study. Arch Surg. 2006;141(2):167–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spanknebel K, Chabot JA, DiGiorgi M, Cheung K, Curty J, Allendorf J, LoGerfo P. Thyroidectomy using monitored local or conventional general anesthesia: an analysis of outpatient surgery, outcome and cost in 1,194 consecutive cases.World J Surg. 2006;30(5):813–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Terris DJ, Moister B, Seybt MW, Gourin CG, Chin E. Outpatient thyroid surgery is safe and desirable.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136(4):556–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Inabnet WB, Shifrin A, Ahmed L, Sinha P. Safety of same day discharge in patients undergoing sutureless thyroidectomy: a comparison of local and general anesthesia. Thyroid. 2008;18(1):57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Champault A, Vons C, Zilberman S, Labaille T, Brosseau S, Franco D. How to perform a thyroidectomy in an outpatient setting.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394(5):897–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trottier DC, Barron P, Moonje V, Tadros S. Outpatient thyroid surgery: should patients be discharged on the day of their procedures?.Can J Surg. 2009;52(3):182–6.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seybt MW, Terris DJ. Outpatient thyroidectomy: experience in over 200 patients. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(5):959–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Snyder SK, Hamid KS, Roberson CR, Rai SS, Bossen AC, Luh JH, Scherer EP, Song J. Outpatient thyroidectomy is safe and reasonable: experience with more than 1,000 planned outpatient procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(5):575–82, 582–4.

  21. Hessman C, Fields J, Schuman E. Outpatient thyroidectomy: is it safe and reasonable option?. Am J Surg. 2011;201(5):565–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Houlton JJ, Pechter W, Steward DL. PACU PTH facilitates safe outpatient total thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(1):43–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sklar M, Ali MJ, Solomon P. Outpatient thyroid surgery in a Toronto community hospital. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;40(6):458–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuggle CT, Roman S, Udelsman R, Sosa JA. Same-day thyroidectomy: a review of practice patterns and outcomes for 1,168 procedures in New York State. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(4):1035–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mazeh H, Khan Q, Schneider DF, Schaefer S, Sippel RS, Chen H. Same-day thyroidectomy program: Eligibility and safety evaluation. Surgery. 2012;152(6):1133–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahmkow SI, Audet N, Nadeau S, Camire’ M, Beaudoin D. Outpatient thyroidectomy: safety and patient’s satisfaction. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;41(Suppl 1):S1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rutledge J, Siegel E, Belcher R, et al. Barriers to same-day discharge of patients undergoing total and completion thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(5):770–4.

  28. Dixon JL, Snyder SK, Lairmore TC, et al. A novel method for the management of post-thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy hematoma: A single-institution experience after over 4,000 central neck operations. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1262–7.

  29. Stack BC Jr, Moore E, Spencer H, et al. Outpatient thyroid surgery data from the University Health System (UHC) Consortium. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(5):740–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lang BH, Yih PC, Lo CY. A review of risk factors and timing for postoperative hematoma after thyroidectomy: is outpatient thyroidectomy really safe?. World J Surg. 2012;36(10):2497–502.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Terris DJ, Snyder S, Carneiro-Pla D, et al. American thyroid association statement on outpatient thyroidectomy. Thyroid. 2013;23(10):1193–202.

  32. Mlodinow A, Ver Halen J, Rambachan A, Gaido J, Kim JY. Anemia is not a predictor of free flap failure: a review of NSQIP data. Microsurgery. 2013;33(6):432–8.

  33. Kim BD, Ver Halen JP, Lim S, Kim JYS. Predictors of 61 unplanned readmission cases in microvascular free tissue transfer patients: Multi-institutional analysis of 774 patients. Microsurgery. 2014. doi:10.1002/micr.22230.

  34. Khanavin N, Mlodinow A, Kim JYS, et al. Predictors of 30-day readmission after outpatient thyroidectomy. An analysis of the 2011 NSQIP dataset. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014;35:332–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Available at: site.acsnsqip.org/participant-use-data-file/. Accessed 14 Mar 2014.

  36. Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:6–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sellers MM, Merkow RP, Halverson A, et al. Validation of new readmission data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is?. Am J Surg. 2009;198(5 Suppl):S19–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Austin PC. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biom J. 2009;51(1):171–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mioton LM, Buck DW 2nd, Gart MS, et al. A multivariate regression analysis of panniculectomy outcomes: does plastic surgery training matter? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(4):604e–12e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10(2):150–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Thoemmes F. Propensity score matching in SPSS 2012. Available at: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1201/1201.6385.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2013.

  43. Sun GH, DeMonner S, Davis MM. Epidemiological and economic trends in inpatient and outpatient thyroidectomy in the United States, 1996-2006. Thyroid. 2013;23(6):727–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Doran HE, England J, Palazzo F. Questionable safety of thyroid surgery with same day discharge. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:543–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mowschenson PM, Hodin RA. Outpatient thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a prospective study of feasibility, safety, and costs. Surgery. 1995;118:1051–3; discussion 1053–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Materazzia G, Dionigic G, Bertia P, et al. One-day thyroid surgery: retrospective analysis of safety and patient satisfaction on a consecutive series of 1,571 cases over a three-year period. Eur Surg Res. 2007;39:182–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Doran HE, Palazzo F. Ambulatory thyroid surgery: do the risks overcome the benefits? Presse Med. 2014;43(3):291–6.

  48. Stavrakis AI, Ituarte PH, Ko CY, Yeh MW. Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery. 2007;142(6):887–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial Support

This particular research received no internal or external grant funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no relevant financial disclosures related to this current work.

Ethical Approval

De-identified patient information is freely available to all institutional members who comply with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Data Use Agreement. The Data Use Agreement implements the protections afforded by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

Disclaimer

The NSQIP and the hospitals participating in the NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not been verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis, or the conclusions derived by the authors of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon P. Ver Halen MD, FACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khavanin, N., Mlodinow, A., Kim, J.Y.S. et al. Assessing Safety and Outcomes in Outpatient versus Inpatient Thyroidectomy using the NSQIP: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 16,370 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 429–436 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3785-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3785-4

Keywords

Navigation