Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peer Group Mentoring of Junior Faculty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this article is to document and evaluate the initiation of a mentoring model for junior faculty utilizing a peer group approach rather than the traditional dyadic model.

Methods

Junior faculty members in an academic department of psychiatry at Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, were invited to take part in a peer mentoring program involving evening meetings every 2 months over a 1-year period from 2004–2005. Of the 12 invitees, 10 agreed to participate in the program. The group participants developed the program agenda collectively. Learning objectives as well as a list of topics of interest were established at the inaugural meeting. A focus group was held at the end of 12 months to provide a descriptive, qualitative evaluation. The focus group leader prepared a report based on observations and notes taken during the focus group.

Results

The report prepared by the focus group leader identified six main themes that included: program development, knowledge gains, interpersonal gains, psychological/emotional gains, process of the program and future directions. The overall response was clearly favorable with a unanimous decision to maintain the group and continue meeting into the next year.

Conclusion

A peer group mentoring format for junior faculty in an academic department of psychiatry can be an effective model of mentoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dunnington GL: The art of mentoring. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 604–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson PC. Mentoring. Acad Med 1990; 70: 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rodenhauser P, Rudisill JR, Dvorak R: Skills for mentors and protégés applicable to psychiatry. Acad Med 2000; 24: 1,14-27

    Google Scholar 

  4. Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, et al. Junior faculty members’ mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 1998; 736: 318–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Steiner JF, Curtis P, Lamphear BP, et al: Assessing the role of influential mentors in the research development of primary care fellows. Acad Med 2004; 79: 865–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wingard DL, Garman KA, Reznik V: Facilitating faculty success: outcomes and cost benefit of the UCSD National Center of Leadership in Academic Medicine. Acad Med 2004; 79(10 suppl): S9–S11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, et al: Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med 1991; 154: 423–426

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, et al: Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine: glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA 1995; 273: 1022–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A: Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1103–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pololi L, Knight S, Dennis K, et al: Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: an innovative, collaborative mentoring program. Acad Med 2002; 77: 377–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swenson JR, Boyle A, Last J, et al: Mentorship in medical education. Annals RCPSC: 1995; 28: 165–169

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kram K, Isabella L: Mentoring alternatives: the role of peer relationships in career development. Acad Manage J 1985; 28: 110–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards K: “Short stops”: peer support of scholarly activity. Acad Med 2002; 77: 939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitley R, Crawford M: Qualitative research in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry 2005; 50: 108–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berk RA, Berg J, Mortimer R, et al: Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med 2005; 80: 66:71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yalom ID, Leszcz M: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th ed. New York, Basic Books, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whitman N: A review of constructivism: understanding and using a relatively new theory. Fam Med 1994; 25: 517–521

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schon DA: Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, Calif., Jossey-Bass, 1987

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Jay Moss M.D.,  John Teshima M.D. &  Molyn Leszcz M.D.

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Hospital, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

    Jay Moss M.D. &  John Teshima M.D.

  3. Department of Psychiatry, Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York, USA

    Molyn Leszcz M.D.

Authors
  1. Jay Moss M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Teshima M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Molyn Leszcz M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Moss M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, J., Teshima, J. & Leszcz, M. Peer Group Mentoring of Junior Faculty. Acad Psychiatry 32, 230–235 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.32.3.230

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.32.3.230

Keywords

Search

Navigation