Abstract
Given the absence of brief “how to do it” articles on self-administered survey research, the author presents suggestions for conducting and publishing questionnaire research successfully. The article covers choosing a topic, framing a core research question that can be tested scientifically with survey data, respecting the study subjects’ time and pride, keeping the survey materials succinct, being persistent, and guaranteeing study subjects’ anonymity or confidentiality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Sheatsley PB: Questionnaire construction and item writing, in Handbook of Survey Research. Edited by Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 1983, pp 195–230
Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB: Handbook of Survey Research. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 1983
Sierles FS, Hendrickx I, Circle S: Cheating in medical school. J Med Educ 1980; 55: 124–125
Brodkey AC, Sierles FS, Spertus IL, et al: Clerkship directors’ perceptions about the effect of managed care on the medical education environment: a survey of clerkship directors from six medical specialties. Acad Med 2002; 77: 1112–1120
Jampala VC, Sierles FS, Taylor MA: The use of DSM-III in the United States: a case of not going by the book. Compr Psychiatry 1988; 29: 39–47
Sierles FS: Correlates of malingering. Behav Sci Law 1984; 2: 113–118
Sierles FS: Medical school factors and career choice of psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 1040–1042
Sierles FS, Magrane D: Psychiatry clerkship directors: who they are, what they do, and what they think. Psychiatr Q 1996; 67: 153–162
Roberts LW, Warner TD, Lyketsos C, et al: Perceptions of academic vulnerability associated with personal illness: a study of 1,027 students at nine medical schools. Collaborative Research Group on Medical Student Health. Compr Psychiatry 2001; 42: 1–15
Baldwin DC Jr, Daugherty SR, Rowley BD, et al: Cheating in medical school: a survey of second-year students at 31 schools. Acad Med 1996; 71: 267–273
Yager J: Preparing psychiatrists to do educational research. Acad Psychiatry 2001; 25: 17–29
Sudman S: Applied sampling, in Handbook of Survey Research. Edited by Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 1983, pp 145–194
Crowne DP, Marlowe D: The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence. New York, Wiley, 1964
Roberts LW, Geppert C, Connor R, et al: An invitation for medical educators to focus on ethical and policy issues in research and scholarly practice. Acad Med 2001; 76: 876–885
Bradburn NM: Response effects, in Handbook of Survey Research. Edited by Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 1983, pp 289–318
Dillman DA: Mail and other self-administered questionnaires, in Handbook of Survey Research. Edited by Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 1983, pp 359–376
Cox EP III: The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: a review. J Marketing Res 1980; 17: 407–422
Green PE, Rao VR: Rating scales and information recovery: how many scales and response categories to use? J Marketing 1970; 34: 33–39
Norman GR, Streiner DL: Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials, 2nd ed. Hamilton, ON, Canada, Decker, 2000
Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, King D, et al: Effect of framing of questionnaire items regarding training on residents’ responses. Acad Med 1999; 74: 192–194
Green SB, Salkind NJ, Akey TM: Using SPSS for Windows, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2000
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sierles, F.S. How to Do Research With Self-Administered Surveys. Acad Psychiatry 27, 104–113 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.27.2.104
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.27.2.104