Original ArticleHow Effective Is Bibliotherapy for Very Old Adults With Subthreshold Depression? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Section snippets
Design
We conducted a randomized controlled trial. After a period of watchful waiting and baseline assessment, the participants were randomized to one of two groups. The intervention group received usual care plus a cognitive behavior therapy-based bibliotherapy intervention, and the control group received usual care only. The participants were randomized with equal probability to the intervention or to usual care in blocks of four by an independent statistician, based random-number tables. The main
Study Sample
To evaluate the effects of the intervention versus usual care, 325 eligible elderly people were invited to participate, 170 of whom met all the inclusion criteria and gave informed consent. They were randomized to the bibliotherapy group (N = 86) or the usual care group (N = 84) (Fig. 1).
Baseline Characteristics
The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. There were no significant differences in these variables between the two groups. Of the 170 parti-cipants, 24 (14.1%) dropped out during the intervention
DISCUSSION
We could not demonstrate any clinically or statistically significant short-term effects of bibliotherapy, compared with usual care, on symptoms of depression in 170 very old adults with subthreshold depression.
Previous research has shown that bibliotherapy can be effective for depression. As described in the Introduction section, several reviews and meta-analysis have been carried out in this respect, and in general, guided self-help was found to be more effective than no treatment, with mean
References (43)
- et al.
Major and minor depression in later life: a study of prevalence and risk factors
J Affect Disord
(1995) Bibliotherapy in unipolar depression: a meta-analysis
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry
(1997)- et al.
A meta-analysis of self-help treatment approaches
Clin Psych Rev
(1993) - et al.
Outcome of depression in later life in primary care: longitudinal cohort study with three years follow-up
BMJ
(2009) - et al.
Review of community prevalence of depression in later life
Br J Psychiatry
(1999) - et al.
Consequences of anxiety in older persons: its effect on disability, well-being and use of health services
Psychol Med
(1999) - et al.
Potential for community programs to prevent depression in older people
Med J Aust
(2002) - et al.
Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance consensus statement on the unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders in late life
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
The natural history of late-life depression: a 6-year prospective study in the community
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(2002) - et al.
Pathway to psychiatric care of the elderly with depression
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry
(1996)
Barriers to care for older adults with depression
Self-help interventions for anxiety disorders: an overview
Curr Psychiatry Rep
A meta-analysis of bibliotherapy studies
Am J Community Psychol
Self-help and Internet-guided interventions in depression and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of meta-analyses
CNS Spectr
What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression
Psychol Med
Cognitive therapy for depression: a comparison of individual psychotherapy and bibliotherapy for depressed older adults
Behav Modif
Self-administered treatments for depression: a review
J Clin Psychol
Bibliotherapy for depressed older adults: a self-help alternative
Gerontologist
Comparative efficacy of cognitive and behavioral bibliotherapy for mildly and moderately depressed older adults
J Consult Clin Psychol
Stepped-care prevention of anxiety and depression in late life: a randomized controlled trial
Arch Gen Psychiatry
Design and pilot results of a single blind randomized controlled trial of systematic demand-led home visits by nurses to frail elderly persons in primary care
BMC Geriatr
Cited by (33)
Efficacy of low intensity interventions for geriatric depression and anxiety β A systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, Journal of Affective DisordersNonpharmacological interventions for subthreshold depression in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
2022, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :In terms of the randomization process, 9 RCTs were rated as causing some concern because they did not explicitly mention the specific methods used for randomization (Gellis and Bruce, 2010; Hermanns et al., 2016; Morgan et al., 2012; Pan et al., 2019; Pibernik-Okanovic et al., 2009; Saisanan Na Ayudhaya et al., 2020; Thapinta et al., 2017; Woolery et al., 2004; Yamamoto et al., 2018). Other studies presented a low risk in the randomization process, including studies in which random numbers were assigned by computer (Basanovic et al., 2020; Buntrock et al., 2015; Ebert et al., 2018; Freire et al., 2015; Pols et al., 2017; Ying et al., 2022; Gellis et al., 2008), random-number tables (Joling et al., 2011; Spek et al., 2007), a sequential assignment list (Takagaki et al., 2016), sealed envelopes (Van Voorhees et al., 2009), a randomized list based on Excel (Kageyama et al., 2021), a computer-generated algorithm (Vucic Lovrencic et al., 2015), simple randomization (Gilbody et al., 2017), permuted-block randomization (Imamura et al., 2014; Willemse et al., 2004), an independent study statistician (Furukawa et al., 2012; Moldovan et al., 2013; Wong et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018, 2019), and others (Kageyama et al., 2021; van Aubel et al., 2020). Two studies had a high risk for bias in deviations from intended interventions (Pan et al., 2019; Thapinta et al., 2017).
Cognitive, behavioural or cognitive-behavioural self-help interventions for subclinical depression in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2022, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :The support was designed to check that the materials had been read, to offer practical advice and problem solve; no psychotherapeutic techniques were used. Five studies (Almeida et al., 2020; Dozeman et al., 2011; Gilbody et al., 2021; Joling et al., 2011; Van der Aa et al., 2015) had usual care as the control condition, two (Moss et al., 2012; Spek et al., 2007) used wait-lists, and one (Boen et al., 2012) used a no-treatment condition. Four studies (Dozeman et al., 2011; Joling et al., 2011; Moss et al., 2012; Van der Aa et al., 2015) used the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD), two studies (Boen et al., 2012; Spek et al., 2007) used the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and two studies (Almeida et al., 2020; Gilbody et al., 2021) used the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
Psychotherapy adaptation in aging populations
2019, Global Mental Health and Psychotherapy: Adapting Psychotherapy for Low- and Middle-Income CountriesA systematic review and meta-analysis of psychotherapy for late-life depression
2015, American Journal of Geriatric PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Four trials were included after authors supplied additional data.23,38,41,42 Since the last meta-analysis of late-life depression,7 eight trials were published.18,20,27,28,30,36,41,42 Outcome data were reported for 2,245 subjects.
Does an outreaching stepped care program reduce depressive symptoms in community-dwelling older adults? A randomized implementation trial
2015, American Journal of Geriatric PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Also, given the implementation character of our study, we allowed for a wide measure of practice variation, which could explain these diverging results. Further, an analysis of elements of our first stepped care trial showed that the first guided self-help phase was not effective.42 This first step consisted of acknowledgement of symptoms, self-management, or exercise.
This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), grant number 2620.00003.