Original Article
How Effective Is Bibliotherapy for Very Old Adults With Subthreshold Depression? A Randomized Controlled Trial

https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181ec8859Get rights and content

Objectives

Depressive symptoms are common among elderly primary care patients, and because they encounter considerable barriers in seeking help and they often resist referral to specialized mental health facilities, it is important to look for easily accessible interventions within the primary care setting. Bibliotherapy, which has been found to be effective among younger populations, might be an attractive option. In this study, the authors investigated the effectiveness of bibliotherapy for depressive symptomatology in very old adults.

Design

Randomized controlled trial. After a 3-month period of β€œwatchful waiting,” the participants were randomly assigned to a bibliotherapy group or a usual care group.

Setting

Thirty-three general practices in the north-western region of the Netherlands.

Participants

One hundred seventy community-dwelling adults, aged 75 and older, with subthreshold depression.

Intervention

The bibliotherapy intervention consisted of an information leaflet and a self-help manual β€œCoping with Depression” adapted for the elderly.

Measurements

Outcome measures after 3 months were a) change in depressive symptoms according to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and b) the proportion of participants who scored a significant improvement on the CES-D.

Results

One hundred forty-six (85.9%) of the 170 participants completed the baseline and follow-up measurements. The authors did not find any clinically relevant and statistically significant differences between the intervention group and the control group in the severity of the depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Bibliotherapy as a stand-alone intervention for the elderly (aged 75 years and older) did not reduce depressive symptoms more than usual care. This might indicate that bibliotherapy can only be effective for patients who are motivated and acknowledge their depression. (Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 19:256–265)

Section snippets

Design

We conducted a randomized controlled trial. After a period of watchful waiting and baseline assessment, the participants were randomized to one of two groups. The intervention group received usual care plus a cognitive behavior therapy-based bibliotherapy intervention, and the control group received usual care only. The participants were randomized with equal probability to the intervention or to usual care in blocks of four by an independent statistician, based random-number tables. The main

Study Sample

To evaluate the effects of the intervention versus usual care, 325 eligible elderly people were invited to participate, 170 of whom met all the inclusion criteria and gave informed consent. They were randomized to the bibliotherapy group (N = 86) or the usual care group (N = 84) (Fig. 1).

Baseline Characteristics

The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. There were no significant differences in these variables between the two groups. Of the 170 parti-cipants, 24 (14.1%) dropped out during the intervention

DISCUSSION

We could not demonstrate any clinically or statistically significant short-term effects of bibliotherapy, compared with usual care, on symptoms of depression in 170 very old adults with subthreshold depression.

Previous research has shown that bibliotherapy can be effective for depression. As described in the Introduction section, several reviews and meta-analysis have been carried out in this respect, and in general, guided self-help was found to be more effective than no treatment, with mean

References (43)

  • AT Beekman et al.

    Major and minor depression in later life: a study of prevalence and risk factors

    J Affect Disord

    (1995)
  • P Cuijpers

    Bibliotherapy in unipolar depression: a meta-analysis

    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • R Gould et al.

    A meta-analysis of self-help treatment approaches

    Clin Psych Rev

    (1993)
  • E Licht-Strunk et al.

    Outcome of depression in later life in primary care: longitudinal cohort study with three years follow-up

    BMJ

    (2009)
  • AT Beekman et al.

    Review of community prevalence of depression in later life

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • E de Beurs et al.

    Consequences of anxiety in older persons: its effect on disability, well-being and use of health services

    Psychol Med

    (1999)
  • MJ Bird et al.

    Potential for community programs to prevent depression in older people

    Med J Aust

    (2002)
  • DS Charney et al.

    Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance consensus statement on the unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders in late life

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • AT Beekman et al.

    The natural history of late-life depression: a 6-year prospective study in the community

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • MG Cole et al.

    Pathway to psychiatric care of the elderly with depression

    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • GL Gottlieb

    Barriers to care for older adults with depression

  • P Cuijpers et al.

    Self-help interventions for anxiety disorders: an overview

    Curr Psychiatry Rep

    (2007)
  • RW Marrs

    A meta-analysis of bibliotherapy studies

    Am J Community Psychol

    (1995)
  • E van't Hof et al.

    Self-help and Internet-guided interventions in depression and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of meta-analyses

    CNS Spectr

    (2009)
  • J Gellatly et al.

    What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression

    Psychol Med

    (2007)
  • M Floyd et al.

    Cognitive therapy for depression: a comparison of individual psychotherapy and bibliotherapy for depressed older adults

    Behav Modif

    (2004)
  • NL McKendree-Smith et al.

    Self-administered treatments for depression: a review

    J Clin Psychol

    (2003)
  • F Scogin et al.

    Bibliotherapy for depressed older adults: a self-help alternative

    Gerontologist

    (1987)
  • F Scogin et al.

    Comparative efficacy of cognitive and behavioral bibliotherapy for mildly and moderately depressed older adults

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1989)
  • PJ van't Veer-Tazelaar et al.

    Stepped-care prevention of anxiety and depression in late life: a randomized controlled trial

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • H van Hout et al.

    Design and pilot results of a single blind randomized controlled trial of systematic demand-led home visits by nurses to frail elderly persons in primary care

    BMC Geriatr

    (2005)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Nonpharmacological interventions for subthreshold depression in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

      2022, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In terms of the randomization process, 9 RCTs were rated as causing some concern because they did not explicitly mention the specific methods used for randomization (Gellis and Bruce, 2010; Hermanns et al., 2016; Morgan et al., 2012; Pan et al., 2019; Pibernik-Okanovic et al., 2009; Saisanan Na Ayudhaya et al., 2020; Thapinta et al., 2017; Woolery et al., 2004; Yamamoto et al., 2018). Other studies presented a low risk in the randomization process, including studies in which random numbers were assigned by computer (Basanovic et al., 2020; Buntrock et al., 2015; Ebert et al., 2018; Freire et al., 2015; Pols et al., 2017; Ying et al., 2022; Gellis et al., 2008), random-number tables (Joling et al., 2011; Spek et al., 2007), a sequential assignment list (Takagaki et al., 2016), sealed envelopes (Van Voorhees et al., 2009), a randomized list based on Excel (Kageyama et al., 2021), a computer-generated algorithm (Vucic Lovrencic et al., 2015), simple randomization (Gilbody et al., 2017), permuted-block randomization (Imamura et al., 2014; Willemse et al., 2004), an independent study statistician (Furukawa et al., 2012; Moldovan et al., 2013; Wong et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018, 2019), and others (Kageyama et al., 2021; van Aubel et al., 2020). Two studies had a high risk for bias in deviations from intended interventions (Pan et al., 2019; Thapinta et al., 2017).

    • Cognitive, behavioural or cognitive-behavioural self-help interventions for subclinical depression in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      The support was designed to check that the materials had been read, to offer practical advice and problem solve; no psychotherapeutic techniques were used. Five studies (Almeida et al., 2020; Dozeman et al., 2011; Gilbody et al., 2021; Joling et al., 2011; Van der Aa et al., 2015) had usual care as the control condition, two (Moss et al., 2012; Spek et al., 2007) used wait-lists, and one (Boen et al., 2012) used a no-treatment condition. Four studies (Dozeman et al., 2011; Joling et al., 2011; Moss et al., 2012; Van der Aa et al., 2015) used the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD), two studies (Boen et al., 2012; Spek et al., 2007) used the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and two studies (Almeida et al., 2020; Gilbody et al., 2021) used the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

    • Psychotherapy adaptation in aging populations

      2019, Global Mental Health and Psychotherapy: Adapting Psychotherapy for Low- and Middle-Income Countries
    • A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychotherapy for late-life depression

      2015, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Four trials were included after authors supplied additional data.23,38,41,42 Since the last meta-analysis of late-life depression,7 eight trials were published.18,20,27,28,30,36,41,42 Outcome data were reported for 2,245 subjects.

    • Does an outreaching stepped care program reduce depressive symptoms in community-dwelling older adults? A randomized implementation trial

      2015, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also, given the implementation character of our study, we allowed for a wide measure of practice variation, which could explain these diverging results. Further, an analysis of elements of our first stepped care trial showed that the first guided self-help phase was not effective.42 This first step consisted of acknowledgement of symptoms, self-management, or exercise.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), grant number 2620.00003.

    View full text