Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:05:36.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Education and Performance Feedback on Rates of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Intensive Care Units in Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Victor Daniel Rosenthal*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Colegiales Medical Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Sandra Guzman
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Colegiales Medical Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Nasia Safdar
Affiliation:
Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin
*
Arengreen 1366, Buenos Aires, Argentina 1405

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the effect of education and performance feedback regarding compliance with catheter care and handwashing on rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) in intensive care units (ICUs).

Setting:

Two level III adult ICUs in a private healthcare facility in Argentina.

Patients:

All adult patients admitted to the study units who had a urinary catheter in place for at least 24 hours.

Methods:

A prospective, open trial in which rates of catheter-associated UTI determined during a baseline period of active surveillance without education and performance feedback were compared with rates of catheter-associated UTI after imple-menting education and performance feedback.

Results:

There were 1,779 catheter-days during the baseline period and 5,568 catheter-days during the intervention period. Compliance regarding prevention of compression of the tubing by a leg improved (from 83% to 96%; relative risk [RR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.03 to 1.28; P = .01) and so did compliance with handwashing (from 23.1% to 65.2%; RR, 2.82; CI95, 2.49 to 3.20; P<.0001). Catheter-associated UTI rates decreased significantly from 21.3 to 12.39 per 1,000 catheter-days (RR, 0.58; CI95, 0.39 to 0.86; P = .006).

Conclusion:

Implementing education and performance feedback regarding catheter care measures and handwashing compliance was associated with a significant reduction in catheter-associated UTI rates. Similar programs may help reduce catheter-associated UTI rates in other Latin American hospitals.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Maki, DG, Tambyah, PA. Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:342347.Google Scholar
2.Warren, JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:609622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Tambyah, PA, Maki, DGC. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1497 catheterized patients. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:678682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report: data summary from January 1992-April 2000, issued June 2000. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:429448.Google Scholar
5.Tambyah, PA, Knasinski, V, Maki, DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:2731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Platt, R, Polk, BF, Murdock, B, Rosner, B. Reduction of mortality associated with nosocomial urinary tract infection. Lancet 1983,1:893897.Google Scholar
7.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Migone, O. Exceso de costos debido a infecciones nosocomiales en dos unidades de cuidados intensivos de un hospital privado de Argentina. Rev Panant Salud Publica. In press.Google Scholar
8.Burke, JP, Larsen, RA, Stevens, LE. Nosocomial bacteriuria: estimating the potential for prevention by closed sterile urinary drainage. Infect Control 1986;7:9699.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Maki, DG, Knasinski, V, Halvorson, K, Tambyah, PA. A novel silver hydrogel-impregnated indwelling urinary catheter reduces CAUTIs: a prospective double blind trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:682.Google Scholar
10.Gaynes, RP, Culver, DH, Emori, TG, et al.The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System: plans for the 1990s and beyond. Am J Med 1991;91:116S120S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Balows, LE, Hausler, W, Shadomy, H. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1991.Google Scholar
13.Wong, ES. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 1983;11:2836.Google Scholar
14.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR 2002:51:145.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Goetz, AM, Kedzuf, S, Wagener, M, Muder, RR. Feedback to nursing staff as an intervention to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:402404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Rosenthal, VD, McCormick, RD, Guzman, S, Villamayor, C, Orellano, PW. Effect of education and performance feedback on handwashing: the benefit of administrative support in Argentinean hospitals. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:8592.Google Scholar
17.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Pezzotto, SM, Crnich, CJ. Effect of an infection control program using education and performance feedback on rates of intravascular device-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in Argentina. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:405409.Google Scholar
18.Britt, MR, Schleupner, CJ, Matsumiya, S. Severity of underlying disease as a predictor of nosocomial infection: utility in the control of nosocomial infection. JAMA 1978;239:10471051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed