Original Investigation
Dialysis therapy
Physician-Diagnosed Depression as a Correlate of Hospitalizations in Patients Receiving Long-Term Hemodialysis

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.002Get rights and content

Background: Hospital admissions consume a large proportion of costs for the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) program in the United States. We investigated whether a physician diagnosis of depression increases the risk for hospitalization or death in patients with ESRD receiving long-term hemodialysis (HD), independent of medical comorbidities. Methods: Centralized Veterans Affairs (VA) databases were used to identify a population-based prevalence cohort of 1,588 male patients with ESRD receiving long-term HD in VA facilities between September 1, 2000, and September 30, 2000. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes were used to identify comorbidities and depression diagnosis. Negative binomial regression models were used to examine the association between depression diagnosis and number of hospitalizations and cumulative hospital days in a 2-year observation period. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between depression diagnosis and hospitalization, death, and death or hospitalization. Results: The prevalence of physician-diagnosed depression was 14.7%. Patients with a depression diagnosis were more likely to be white and have more comorbidities. Depression diagnosis was associated with increased hospital days (rate ratio for adjusted model, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.66) and increased number of hospitalizations (rate ratio for adjusted model, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.52). Depression diagnosis was not statistically associated with death or the composite of death or hospitalization in adjusted models. Conclusion: Physician-diagnosed depression was associated significantly with both increased hospitalization rate and length of stay in patients with ESRD receiving outpatient HD in VA facilities, independent of demographics and comorbidities. Prospective studies should be conducted to assess whether treatment of depression will decrease hospitalization in these patients.

Section snippets

Participants and Explanatory Variables

This study is a retrospective cohort study of 1,588 prevalent males with ESRD receiving outpatient long-term HD who were identified by using the Outpatient Care Files of centralized Department of VA administrative data sets.15 Patients were included if they had at least 1 outpatient HD Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (version 2003)16 of 90935, 90936, 90937, or 90999 between September 1, 2000, and September 30, 2000. To include only patients on long-term HD therapy and exclude patients

Patients

One thousand five hundred eighty-eight patients were studied, of whom 233 patients (14.7%) had a physician diagnosis of depression. Mean age was not statistically significantly different among patients based on depression diagnosis (Table 1). Patients with a depression diagnosis were more likely to be white and have hypertension, ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, liver disease, and substance abuse (Table 1). Mean number of outpatient encounters during October 1, 1999, and

Discussion

Of male patients with ESRD receiving outpatient long-term HD in the VA health care system, approximately 15% had a physician diagnosis of depression. The prevalence of depression reported here is similar to that reported by Lopes et al8 in a prospective cohort of HD patients from the United States and Europe. In general, patients with a depression diagnosis were more likely to be white and have more medical comorbidities than those without a depression diagnosis. Although a physician diagnosis

References (31)

  • N. Frasure-Smith et al.

    Depression and 18-month prognosis after myocardial infarction

    Circulation

    (1995)
  • A.H. Glassman et al.

    Sertraline treatment of major depression in patients with acute MI or unstable angina

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • I.M. Numan et al.

    Correlates of depression in chronic dialysis patientsMorbidity and mortality

    Res Nurs Health

    (1981)
  • R.A. Peterson et al.

    Depression, perception of illness and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease

    Int J Psychiatry Med

    (1991)
  • H.B. Bosworth et al.

    Use of psychiatric and medical health care by veterans with severe mental illness

    Psychiatr Serv

    (2004)
  • Cited by (117)

    • Depression symptoms and quality of life in patients receiving renal replacement therapy in Jordan: A cross-sectional study

      2021, Annals of Medicine and Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      This may be explained by the fact that patients receiving RRT can experience depressive symptoms when they become less active in the group, but that as time passes, they may begin to adjust and adapt to their current clinical regimen, or that the decreased fluctuation in their biochemical parameters causes them to experience less depressive symptoms than when they first started receiving RRT. Other research, on the other hand, found that younger age, female gender, longer dialysis period, and comorbidities were the most important predictors of depression and depressive symptoms [28,29]. The lack of a correlation between depressive symptoms and age or gender in this study could suggest that RRT patients take each day as it comes.

    • Social determinants of racial and socioeconomic disparities in CKD and ESRD

      2020, Psychosocial Aspects of Chronic Kidney Disease: Exploring the Impact of CKD, Dialysis, and Transplantation on Patients
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.002 on September 2, 2005.

    Supported in part by a fellowship grant from the Agency for Health Care, Research, and Quality (S.S.H.); grant no. DK02724-01A1 from The National Institutes of Health (L.A.S.); investigator initiative grant no. 20-034 from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development (H.B.B.); and grant no. R01 HL070713 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (H.B.B.).

    The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    View full text