Skip to main content
Log in

A physician-based voluntary reporting system for adverse events and medical errors

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To create a voluntary reporting method for identifying adverse events (AEs) and potential adverse events (PAEs) among medical inpatients.

DESIGN: Medical house officers asked their peers about obstacles to care, injuries or extended hospitalizations, and problems with medications that affected their patients. Two independent reviewers coded event narratives for adverse outcomes, responsible parties, preventability, and process problems. We corroborated house officers’ reports with hospital incident reports and conducted a retrospective chart review.

SETTING: The cardiac step-down, oncology, and medical intensive care units of an urban teaching hospital.

INTERVENTION: Structured confidential interviews by postgraduate year-2 and -3 medical residents of interns during work rounds.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents reported 88 events over 3 months. AEs occurred among 5 patients (0.5% of admissions) and PAEs among 48 patients (4.9% of admissions). Delayed diagnoses and treatments figured prominently among PAEs (54%). Clinicians were responsible for the greatest number of incidents (55%), followed by workers in the laboratory (11%), radiology (15%), and pharmacy (3%). Respondents identified a variety of problematic processes of care, including problems with diagnosis (16%), therapy (26%), and failure to provide clinical and support services (29%). We corroborated 84% of reported events in the medical record. Participants found voluntary peer reporting of medical errors unobtrusive and agreed that it could be implemented on a regular basis.

CONCLUSIONS: A physician-based voluntary reporting system for medical errors is feasible and acceptable to front-line clinicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Billings CE, Reynard WD. Human factors in aircraft incidents: Results of a 7-year study. Avn Space Environ Med. 1984;55:960–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Welsh CH, Pedot RP, Anderson RJ. Use of morning report to enhance adverse event detection. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:454–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook F, Bates DW, Lee TH, Brennan TA. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:370–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cullen CJ, Bates DW, Small SD, Cooper JB, Nemeskal AR, Leape LL. The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995;12:541–52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Summary of 1999 Information Submitted to MedMARxSM: A National Database for Hospital Medication Error Reporting. Rockland, Md: US Pharmacopeia, 2000. Also available at http://www.usp.org/medmarx.

    Google Scholar 

  8. http.www.fda.gov/medwatch.

  9. Weingart SN, Ship AN, Aronson MD. Confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical inpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:470–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weingart SN. Identifying “barriers to care”: confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical and surgical inpatients. In: Proceedings of Enhancing Patient Safety and Reducing Errors in Health Care; 8–10 November 1998. Rancho Mirage, California: National Patient Safety Foundation; 1998:292–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1995;163:458–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saul N. Weingart MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weingart, S.N., Callanan, L.D., Ship, A.N. et al. A physician-based voluntary reporting system for adverse events and medical errors. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 809–814 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10231.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10231.x

Key words

Navigation