Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To create a voluntary reporting method for identifying adverse events (AEs) and potential adverse events (PAEs) among medical inpatients.
DESIGN: Medical house officers asked their peers about obstacles to care, injuries or extended hospitalizations, and problems with medications that affected their patients. Two independent reviewers coded event narratives for adverse outcomes, responsible parties, preventability, and process problems. We corroborated house officers’ reports with hospital incident reports and conducted a retrospective chart review.
SETTING: The cardiac step-down, oncology, and medical intensive care units of an urban teaching hospital.
INTERVENTION: Structured confidential interviews by postgraduate year-2 and -3 medical residents of interns during work rounds.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents reported 88 events over 3 months. AEs occurred among 5 patients (0.5% of admissions) and PAEs among 48 patients (4.9% of admissions). Delayed diagnoses and treatments figured prominently among PAEs (54%). Clinicians were responsible for the greatest number of incidents (55%), followed by workers in the laboratory (11%), radiology (15%), and pharmacy (3%). Respondents identified a variety of problematic processes of care, including problems with diagnosis (16%), therapy (26%), and failure to provide clinical and support services (29%). We corroborated 84% of reported events in the medical record. Participants found voluntary peer reporting of medical errors unobtrusive and agreed that it could be implemented on a regular basis.
CONCLUSIONS: A physician-based voluntary reporting system for medical errors is feasible and acceptable to front-line clinicians.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
Billings CE, Reynard WD. Human factors in aircraft incidents: Results of a 7-year study. Avn Space Environ Med. 1984;55:960–5.
Welsh CH, Pedot RP, Anderson RJ. Use of morning report to enhance adverse event detection. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:454–60.
O’Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook F, Bates DW, Lee TH, Brennan TA. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:370–6.
Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34.
Cullen CJ, Bates DW, Small SD, Cooper JB, Nemeskal AR, Leape LL. The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995;12:541–52.
Summary of 1999 Information Submitted to MedMARxSM: A National Database for Hospital Medication Error Reporting. Rockland, Md: US Pharmacopeia, 2000. Also available at http://www.usp.org/medmarx.
http.www.fda.gov/medwatch.
Weingart SN, Ship AN, Aronson MD. Confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical inpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:470–7.
Weingart SN. Identifying “barriers to care”: confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical and surgical inpatients. In: Proceedings of Enhancing Patient Safety and Reducing Errors in Health Care; 8–10 November 1998. Rancho Mirage, California: National Patient Safety Foundation; 1998:292–6.
Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1995;163:458–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weingart, S.N., Callanan, L.D., Ship, A.N. et al. A physician-based voluntary reporting system for adverse events and medical errors. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 809–814 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10231.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.10231.x