Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The role of home blood pressure measurement in managing hypertension: an evidence-based review

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 16, pages 469–472 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

This article reviews the current literature regarding the role of home measurement of blood pressure (BP) in the management of hypertension. Subjects with hypertension can use simple automated devices to measure their own BP at home. The results can be accurate and reliable, and because multiple readings allow a mean value to be calculated, a better estimate of the underlying BP level is obtained. Home measurement of BP gives results which are equivalent to the accepted ‘gold standard’ measure of ambulatory BP values, whilst using a simpler and much less expensive technique which is therefore more widely available. Both methods are better than conventional office measurements in identifying the ‘true’ or underlying mean BP level and identifying falsely raised levels or ‘white coat hypertension’. White coat hypertension confounds the treatment of hypertension, but may not be entirely harmless. Ambulatory BP is a better predictor of cardiovascular prognosis than clinic BP. The use of home BP measurement as an equivalent, feasible, and (apparently) more cost-effective technique to measure BP in hypertension, should enable groups of patients with a poorer prognosis to be identified and their treatment adjusted in order to improve their prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chalmers J WHO-ISH Guidelines Committee. Committee, World Health Organisation—International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension J Hypertens 1999; 17: 151–185

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frijling BD et al. Blood pressure control in treated hypertensivepatients: clinical performance of general practitioners BJGP 2001; 51: 9–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stergiou GS et al. White coat effect detected using self-monitoring of blood pressure at home: comparison with ambulatory blood pressure Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 820–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Appel L, Stason W . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood pressure self-measurement in the diagnosis and management of hypertension Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 867–882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yarows SA et al. Home blood pressure monitoring Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1251–1257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. EBMWG. Users guide to the medical literature JAMA 1994; 271: 389–391

  7. Osman A et al. Users guide to the medical literature JAMA 1994; 272: 1367–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett D . Evidence-Based Medicine: how to practice and teach EBM Churchill Livingstone 1997

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenhalgh T . How to Read a Paper BMJ Publishing Group 1997

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramsay L et al. British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary BMJ 1999; 319: 630–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anonymous . American Society of Hypertension releases guidelines on home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring Am Family Physic 1996; 54: 1390

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad N, Isles C . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a guide for general practitioners BMJ 1996; 313: 1535–1541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohkubo T et al. Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan J Hypertens 1998; 16: 971–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Brien E et al. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the BHS protocol Blood Press Monit 1996; 1: 55–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Walma E et al. Accuracy of an oscillometric automatic blood pressure device. The Omron HEM 430C J Hum Hypertens 1995; 9: 169–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stergiou GS et al. Home self-monitoring of blood pressure: is fully automated oscillometric technique as good as conventional stethoscopic technique? Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 428–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Brien E et al. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension BMJ 2001; 322: 531–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chatellier G et al. Home self blood pressure measurement in general practice: The SMART study Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 644–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aylett M, Marples G, Jones K . Home blood pressure monitoring: its effect on the management of hypertension in general practice Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 725–728

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Garcia-Vera MP, Sanz J . How many self-measured blood pressure readings are needed to estimate hypertensivepatients’ ‘true’ blood pressure? J Behav Med 1999; 22: 93–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mancia G et al. Blood pressures other than the one at the clinic Blood Press Suppl 1997; 2: 81–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mancia G et al. Ambulatory blood pressure normality: results from the PAMELA study J Hypertens 1995; 13: 1377–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Perloff D, Sokolow M, Cowan R . The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressures JAMA 1983; 249: 2792–2798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Perloff D, Sokolow M, Cowan R . The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in treated hypertensivepatients J Hypertens 1991; 9: (Suppl 1): 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parati G et al. Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension J Hypertens 1987; 5: 93–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoegholm A et al. Left ventricular mass and geometry inpatients with established hypertension and white coat hypertension Am J Hypertens 1993; 6: 282–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cox J, O'Malley K, O'Brien E . Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in general practice BJGP 1992; 42: 402–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Levy G et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study NEJM 1990; 322: 1561–1566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mancia G et al. Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation [published erratum appears in Circulation 1997; 96: 1065] Circulation 1997; 95: 1464–1470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brueren M et al. A series of self measurements by thepatient is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure measurement BJGP 1998; 48: 1585–1589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nordmann A et al. Reliability ofpatients measuring blood pressure at home: prospective observational study BMJ 1999; 319: 1172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pickering T et al. How common is white coat hypertension? JAMA 1988; 259: 225–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Muscholl M et al. Changes in left ventricular structure and function inpatients with white coat hypertension BMJ 1998; 317: 565–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nabantgil I et al. The prevalence of silent myocardial ischaemia in white coat hypertension J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12: 337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Aylett M . Use of home blood pressure measurements to diagnose ‘white coat hypertension’ in general practice J Hum Hypertens 1996; 10: 17–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ashida T et al. Relationship between home blood pressure measurement and medication compliance and name recognition of antihypertensive drugs Hypertens Res Clin Exper 2000; 23: 21–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Soghikian K et al. Home blood pressure monitoring. Effect on use of medical services and medical care costs Med Care 1992; 30: 855–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Omron . Product literature for the Omron HEM-705 CP 1998

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. King Edward Road Surgery, Northampton, NN1 5LY, UK

    J Rickerby

Authors
  1. J Rickerby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Rickerby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rickerby, J. The role of home blood pressure measurement in managing hypertension: an evidence-based review. J Hum Hypertens 16, 469–472 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001423

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001423

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links