Abstract
Background:
Recent large-scale prospective studies suggest that long telomeres are associated with an increase cancer risk, counter to conventional wisdom.
Methods:
To further clarify the association between leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and prostate cancer, and assess genetic variability in relation to both LTL and prostate cancer, we performed a nested case–control study (922 cases and 935 controls). The participants provided blood in 1993–1995 and were followed through August 2004 (prostate cancer incidence) or until 28 February 2013 (lethal or fatal prostate cancer). Relative LTL was measured by quantitative PCR and was calculated as the ratio of telomere repeat copy number to a single gene (36B4) copy number (T/S). Genotyping was performed using the TaqMan OpenArray SNP Genotyping Platform. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all prostate cancer and subtypes defined by Gleason grade, stage and lethality (metastasis or death).
Results:
We observed a positive association between each s.d. increase in LTL and all (multivariable-adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.22), low-grade (OR 1.13, 95% CI:1.01–1.27), and localised (OR 1.12, 95% CI:1.01–1.24) prostate cancer. Associations for other subtypes were similar, but did not reach statistical significance. In subgroup analyses, associations for high grade and advanced stage (OR=2.04, 95% CI 1.00–4.17; Pinteraction=0.06) or lethal disease (OR=2.37, 95% CI 1.19–4.72; Pinteraction=0.01) were stronger in men with a family history of the disease compared with those without. The minor allele of SNP, rs7726159, which has previously been shown to be positively associated with LTL, showed an inverse association with all prostate cancer risk after correction for multiple testing (P=0.0005).
Conclusion:
In this prospective study, longer LTL was modestly associated with higher risk of prostate cancer. A stronger association for more aggressive cancer in men with a family history of the disease needs to be confirmed in larger studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Several studies have examined leukocyte telomere length (LTL) in relation to cancers, but with contrasting results (Hou et al, 2012). Initially, shorter telomeres were believed to be associated with an increase in cancer risk, but recent large-scale prospective studies have observed null associations (De Vivo et al, 2009; Weischer et al, 2013) or showed that long telomeres are associated with an increased risk in cancer (Shen et al, 2011; Hou et al, 2012; Lan et al, 2013; Lynch et al, 2013). One prospective study on LTL and colorectal cancer observed a u-shaped association (Cui et al, 2012). Recently, Gu and Wu (2013) proposed that this inconsistency may be in part because the effect of LTL varies by specific cancer type. Another potential explanation is that non-prospective case–control studies were subject to reverse causation in which tumour carcinogenesis affected telomere length. In a meta-analysis stratified by study design, Wentzensen et al (2011) observed that increased risk in cancer associated with short telomeres was mainly driven by case–control studies (odds ratio (OR) in pooled analysis=1.96; OR in case–control studies=2.9; OR in prospective studies=1.16), suggesting that telomere shortening occurs mainly after diagnosis, and therefore, might not be of value in cancer risk prediction (Pooley et al, 2010). Indirect evidence that both short and long LTL may contribute to the development of specific cancers comes from a recent genome wide association study (GWAS) that identified loci associated with LTL (Codd et al, 2013) and assessed their association with different cancer types. The authors found that alleles associated with LTL showed associations with specific cancers in both directions (Codd et al, 2013).
Currently, only two prospective studies have investigated circulating LTL and prostate cancer. In a nested case–control study in the Prostate, Lung, Colon and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO), men with shorter telomeres appeared to have a lower risk of advanced prostate cancer (OR=0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–1.02, comparing the lowest quartile with the highest) (Mirabello et al, 2009). A Danish population-based cohort study of 47 102 individuals indicated an inverse association between shorter telomeres and prostate cancer incidence (hazard ratio (HR)=0.94, 95% CI 0.85–1.04, cases n=418), but not fatal prostate cancer (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.87–1.25; deaths n=157) (Weischer et al, 2013).
In genetic studies, the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and the telomerase RNA component (TERC) genes, together comprising the most important unit of the telomerase complex, were identified as risk loci for prostate cancer (Rafnar et al, 2009; Kote-Jarai et al, 2011; Kote-Jarai et al, 2013). Variants in these genes have been associated with LTL in recent GWAS (Codd et al, 2010; Bojesen et al, 2013; Codd et al, 2013; Pooley et al, 2013). The mechanisms that link LTL with cancer is much more complex than the oversimplified view presented so far. To further clarify the association between LTL and risk of all prostate cancer as well as subtypes defined by Gleason grade, stage and progression, we performed a case–control study of 922 cases and 935 controls nested within the prospective Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS). In addition, we evaluated the association of variation in genes related to telomere length as well as prostate cancer with both prostate cancer risk and telomere length.
Materials and methods
Study population
We ascertained incident prostate cancer cases and sampled controls from participants in the HPFS, a prospective cohort study of 51 529 US men aged 40–75 years who enrolled in 1986 (https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hpfs). The men filled out mailed surveys on their demographics, lifestyle, and medical history at baseline and during follow-up every 2 years, and on their diet at baseline and every 4 years. Deaths in the participants are identified through the National Death Index (Stampfer et al, 1984), reports by family members or the postal system in response to the mailed surveys. A total of 18 018 of the participants provided a blood sample between 1993 and 1995, as previously described (Platz et al, 2008). Of these men, we excluded those who had a cancer diagnosis (except non-melanoma skin cancer) before the date that they provided a blood sample. The majority (95%) of the men are white of European descent; since both telomere length and prostate cancer incidence differ by race, we restricted the analyses to white men (n=123 non-whites were excluded).
Prostate cancers were first identified from self-reports on questionnaires or from death certificates, and then confirmed by medical record review. Study investigators reviewed medical and pathology records to extract data on stage (TNM staging system) at diagnosis and histological grade, assessed using Gleason scores. We used pathological stage and grade when available and clinical measures if pathological information was not available. Deaths were identified via repeated mailings, telephone calls, and searches of the National Death Index. Causes of deaths were confirmed through review of medical records and death certificates. Biennial follow-up surveys were mailed to those who reported prostate cancer to collect information on disease progression (e.g., metastases). We identified 922 eligible prostate cancer cases between the dates of blood draw through August 2004. Follow-up for progression to prostate cancer-specific death was complete through 28 February 2013; 96.1% of the prostate cancer cases were confirmed by medical record review.
In the original nested case–control design, for each case, we sampled a control that was alive and had not been diagnosed with cancer up to the date of the case’s diagnosis. The cases and controls were matched on year of birth, ever having had a PSA test before the date of providing the blood sample, and the time of day, season, and year that the blood sample was provided. To be eligible, controls were required to have had a PSA test after the date they provided a blood sample.
The Human Subjects Committee of the Harvard School of Public Health approved the HPFS, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Both the Human Subjects Committee of the Harvard School of Public Health and the Institutional Review Board at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health approved the study on telomeres, genetic variability and prostate cancer.
Telomere length determination
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using the QIAmp 96-spin blood protocol (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA). Pico-Green quantification of genomic DNA was performed using a Molecular Devices 96-well spectrophotometer (Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Relative LTL was determined using a modified, high-throughput version of the quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based telomere assay (Cawthon, 2002; Wang et al, 2008). The qPCR telomere assay was run on Applied Biosystems 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Foster City, CA, USA). Laboratory personnel were blinded to participant characteristics and all assays were processed in triplicates by the same technician, and under identical conditions. The average relative LTL was calculated as the ratio of telomere repeat copy number to a single gene (36B4) copy number (T/S). Relative LTL is reported as the exponentiated T/S ratio corrected for a reference sample. The telomere and single-gene assay coefficients of variation (CVs) for triplicates were <0.8%. The CV for the mean exponential T/S ratio was 16.0%. Although this assay provides a relative measurement of telomere length, T/S ratios highly correlate with absolute telomere lengths determined by southern blot (r=0.82; P<0.001) (Cawthon, 2002).
Covariate assessment
We used information from the 1994 questionnaire or, if not available, the most recent before 1994 to calculate body mass index (BMI), smoking amount (indicated by pack-years), alcohol consumption (indicated by grams of ethanol) and vigorous physical activity (indicated by metabolic equivalent (MET) per week) as close to time of blood donation (1993–1995, with the majority donating blood in 1994) as possible.
Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) selection and genotyping
The main aim was to evaluate SNPs previously related to telomere length, but we also included SNPs that have been related to prostate cancer risk if they were located in or close to telomere maintenance genes (TERC or TERT). We identified 32 SNPs from GWA (Rafnar et al, 2009; Codd et al, 2010; Levy et al, 2010; Kote-Jarai et al, 2011; Prescott et al, 2011; Mangino et al, 2012; Bojesen et al, 2013; Codd et al, 2013; Pooley et al, 2013) or fine mapping studies (Kote-Jarai et al, 2013) that had minor allele frequencies >5% in whites. For SNPs that were in linkage disequilibrium with R2>0.80, we selected the SNP with the stronger association from the literature. We were able to genotype 22 SNPs (see Supplementary Table 1), but 1 failed genotyping (rs6772228). Blood samples from matched case–control pairs were handled identically and assayed in the same batch in a blinded fashion. Genotyping was performed at the Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center High-Throughput Genotyping Core using the TaqMan OpenArray SNP Genotyping Platform (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To validate genotyping procedures, 10% blinded quality control samples were inserted. All SNPs had >90% genotype completion, and the concordance was 100% for blinded quality control samples.
Statistical analysis
The final sample size consisted of 922 cases and 935 controls, after removal of failed qPCR samples (25%). To preserve sample size, we included all cases and controls in the analysis irrespective of whether the matched pair was present. We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate ORs and 95% CIs of prostate cancer, adjusting for age at blood draw (continuous, years) and matching factors (age at selection (continuous, years), PSA test before blood collection (yes/no/unknown) and year of blood collection). We did not adjust for the time of day and season that the blood sample was provided because these factors were not related to telomere length. In a second model, we additionally adjusted for smoking (0, 0.1–20, 20.1–40, >40 pack-years), BMI (<25,⩾25–29.9, ⩾30–34.9, ⩾35 kg m−2), and vigorous physical activity (quartiles, MET-hours per week), since these factors have been associated with telomere length as well as prostate cancer (Giovannucci and Michaud, 2007; Mirabello et al, 2009). We also estimated the ORs of (a) low grade (n=461; Gleason sum <7), (b) Gleason sum=7 (n=307), (c) high grade (n=90; Gleason sum >7), (d) lethal disease (n=81; death by prostate cancer or metastasis in bone or other organs, except lymph nodes), (e) localised disease (n=774; TNM stage T1b, T2b, T3a, and N0M0) and (f) advanced stage or lethal disease (n=103) (⩾T3b, N+, or M+ at diagnosis or progression to metastasis or prostate cancer death during follow-up).
We modelled LTL in two ways: (1) using indicator variables for quartiles of relative LTL with cut points based on the distribution among the controls and (2) using LTL as a continuous measure (per s.d.). We assessed effect modification by age at blood draw (dichotomised by the median; ⩽64 or >64 years), cigarette smoking status (ever, never) in 1994 and family history of prostate cancer (yes/no). We present stratified effect estimates by each of these characteristics. We also assessed whether telomere length was associated with early-onset prostate cancer (⩽age 65). The statistical significance of the interaction was assessed using a Wald test for the multiplicative interaction term of each of the characteristics and LTL (modelled continuously).
The additive genetic model was used for the SNP analyses, which assumes that the effect of the heterozygous genotype is intermediate between the two homozygous genotypes. The homozygous genotype of the major allele was coded as 0. Age-adjusted (age at blood draw) unconditional logistic regression between each individual SNP and prostate cancer or low and high LTL (dichotomised at the median) was performed and P-values were Bonferroni corrected, considering 21 independent tests. All P-values were two sided and analyses were conducted using SAS release 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Cases and controls were similar on demographic and lifestyle factors (Table 1). The mean age at prostate cancer diagnosis was 69.5 years and the mean time between blood draw and diagnosis was 5.5 years. As expected, a statistically significant inverse correlation was found between relative telomere length and age at blood draw (r=−0.19, P<0.0001) in controls.
Leukocyte telomere length was not associated with all prostate cancer or any of the subtypes when comparing quartiles of LTL; neither in models adjusting for the matching factors or when additionally adjusting for BMI, smoking and physical activity (Table 2). When telomere length was modelled continuously, however, longer telomeres were modestly positively associated with all prostate cancer (P=0.03), low-grade (P=0.04) and localised (P=0.03; Table 2) prostate cancer. Per each s.d. increase in telomere length, the OR was 1.11 for all prostate cancer, 1.13 for low-grade disease and 1.12 for localised disease. Results were similar for intermediate grade, high-grade, advanced and lethal disease, but the estimates were not statistically significant. Of note, 28 cases were overlapping between the high-grade (n=90) and the advanced stage or lethal disease (n=103) groups. With that in mind, these two outcomes should not be considered completely independent results.
As presented in Table 3, there was some evidence that men with a family history of prostate cancer had an increase in risk of high-grade (OR=2.04, 95% CI 1.00–4.17) as well as advanced stage or lethal disease (OR=2.37, 95% CI 1.19–4.72) per s.d. increase in telomere length, with P for interaction 0.06 and 0.01, respectively. Among men without a family history, telomere length was not associated with high-grade (OR=1.07, 95% CI 0.84–1.36) or advanced stage or lethal disease (OR=1.01, 95% CI 0.81–1.25). Consistent with our family-history-specific findings, the association of LTL and early-onset prostate cancer (⩽age 65) for high-grade (13 cases/236 controls) and advanced stage or lethal disease (21 cases/236 controls) were stronger in this subgroup compared with those diagnosed at a later age (>65). However, precision of these estimates lacked due to the small number of cases; OR 1.62 (95% CI: 0.85–3.11) for high-grade tumours and OR 1.37 (95% CI: 0.84–2.25) for advanced stage or lethal tumours.
The minor allele (A) of SNP, rs7726159 (TERT), showed a statistically significant inverse association with all prostate cancer risk after correction for multiple testing (per-allele OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68–0.90, P=0.0005; Supplementary Table 1). Association within subtypes of prostate cancer yielded similar results (data not shown). None of the SNPs showed corrected significant associations with telomere length.
Discussion
In this prospective study, we found that longer circulating LTL may be moderately associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer. Longer telomere length was associated with a higher risk of high-grade, advanced stage or lethal disease in men with a family history of prostate cancer. The minor allele of SNP (rs7726159) in the TERT gene showed a statistically significant inverse association with prostate cancer, but there was no evidence that this SNP was associated with telomere length in our study.
Telomeres are repetitive DNA sequences (TTAGGG) that protect the ends of linear chromosomes. In adult somatic cells telomeres shorten over time because standard DNA polymerase cannot replicate them during cell division, a phenomenon called the end-replication problem. The epidemiological evidence for associations between circulating LTL and cancer has been equivocal. Some studies support the hypothesis that shorter circulating LTL is associated with higher cancer risk (Wentzensen et al, 2011; Hou et al, 2012), although the associations tend to be stronger in retrospective studies and may differ by cancer type (Gu and Wu, 2013). In prospective studies, long telomeres have been associated with an increased risk of several cancers such as melanoma (Han et al, 2009), lung cancer (Shen et al, 2011), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Lan et al, 2013) and pancreatic cancer (Lynch et al, 2013). There are plausible explanations also for a positive association between LTL and cancer. As short telomeres may induce cellular senescence, long telomeres are generally a marker for actively reproducing cells that are at higher risk of obtaining tumour-causing mutations (Jones et al, 2012). The importance of balance between elongation (by the telomerase enzyme) and telomere shortening to maintain a stable, ‘optimal’ length for cell cycle control has also been suggested (Ducray et al, 1999). For an accurate comparison between studies, consistent methodologies are needed. Most of the large epidemiological studies have used qPCR to estimate LTL, since this method enables high-throughput and low amounts of DNA (Cawthon, 2002). The DNA extraction method may also affect telomere length estimates (Cunningham et al, 2013). Thus, inter-laboratory variability and measurement error may also explain some of the inconsistency between studies (Savage et al, 2013).
For prostate cancer, two prior prospective studies indicated that shorter telomeres were associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer (Mirabello et al, 2009; Weischer et al, 2013). In a previous study, derived from a sub-sample of the HPFS cohort, the association between telomere length and variability in telomere length (measured by a FISH assay) in prostate cancer cells and surrounding stromal cells was evaluated (Heaphy et al, 2013). In this study, men whose prostate cancer cells had higher cell-to-cell variability in telomere length or who had shorter telomeres in prostate-cancer-associated stromal cells were more likely to have a worse prognosis than other men. Although telomere length in different tissues shows a high correlation (Daniali et al, 2013), there were several differences between this study and the current including, the telomere length assessment method (FISH assay), timing of telomere measurement (after disease diagnosis), and the study population (a subset of men who had undergone treatment for disease by radical prostatectomy).
The results from the two prospective studies appear to be consistent with regard to prostate cancer incidence (aside from a non-statistically significant association in the PLCO (Mirabello et al, 2009) study between shorter telomeres and increased risk of prostate cancer when restricting to men with a family history of prostate cancer). The PLCO study (Mirabello et al, 2009) focused on aggressive disease only—defined as advanced stage and Gleason sum ⩾7. The Danish study (where PSA screening is not routine) also assessed death in men with prostate cancer, but in this group the associations were null (HR for each 1-kb decrease in telomere length 1.04, 95% CI: 0.87–1.25) (Weischer et al, 2013). We measured telomere length in the same laboratory as the PLCO study, and the Danish study used assays derived from the same method. The mean or median age at blood draw in all three studies was in the early to the mid-60s. The results from the present study did not show a statistically significant association between longer telomere length and more aggressive prostate cancer (defined as high grade, lethal, advanced stage or lethal); however, we cannot exclude that modest associations exist. We observed a higher risk of more aggressive prostate cancer among men with longer telomeres who also had a family history of prostate cancer. These results are interesting given the finding that paternal age is a determinant of telomere length in offspring (Prescott et al, 2012). However, due to a small sample size and several stratifications, these results should be interpreted with caution.
The minor allele (A) of one individual SNP (rs7726159) in the TERT gene was modestly associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Although this SNP has been shown to be associated with longer LTL in GWAS (Pooley et al, 2013), we did not observe that association in our study. Considering this, the present result should be interpreted with caution since we cannot exclude that the observed association is due to chance. The strengths of this study include its prospective design, rich covariate information, a relatively large number of prostate cases, detailed clinical information on the grade and stage of the cases, and long-term follow-up for progression. This study also had some limitations. We had a small number of high-grade, advanced stage or lethal cases, which reduced the precision of our estimates for these specific analyses. Our results, however, did not indicate any major differences in associations between subtypes.
In summary, our prospective findings suggest that longer circulating LTL may be associated with a higher risk of overall prostate cancer, including more aggressive disease, especially in men who have a family history of prostate cancer.
Change history
17 February 2015
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Bojesen SE, Pooley KA, Johnatty SE, Beesley J, Michailidou K, Tyrer JP, Edwards SL, Pickett HA, Shen HC, Smart CE, Hillman KM, Mai PL, Lawrenson K, Stutz MD, Lu Y, Karevan R, Woods N, Johnston RL, French JD, Chen X, Weischer M, Nielsen SF, Maranian MJ, Ghoussaini M, Ahmed S, Baynes C, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dennis J, McGuffog L, Barrowdale D, Lee A, Healey S, Lush M, Tessier DC, Vincent D, Bacot F, Vergote I, Lambrechts S, Despierre E, Risch HA, Gonzalez-Neira A, Rossing MA, Pita G, Doherty JA, Alvarez N, Larson MC, Fridley BL, Schoof N, Chang-Claude J, Cicek MS, Peto J, Kalli KR, Broeks A, Armasu SM, Schmidt MK, Braaf LM, Winterhoff B, Nevanlinna H, Konecny GE, Lambrechts D, Rogmann L, Guenel P, Teoman A, Milne RL, Garcia JJ, Cox A, Shridhar V, Burwinkel B, Marme F, Hein R, Sawyer EJ, Haiman CA, Wang-Gohrke S, Andrulis IL, Moysich KB, Hopper JL, Odunsi K, Lindblom A, Giles GG, Brenner H, Simard J, Lurie G, Fasching PA, Carney ME, Radice P, Wilkens LR, Swerdlow A, Goodman MT, Brauch H, Garcia-Closas M, Hillemanns P, Winqvist R, Durst M, Devilee P, Runnebaum I, Jakubowska A, Lubinski J, Mannermaa A, Butzow R, Bogdanova NV, Dork T, Pelttari LM, Zheng W, Leminen A, Anton-Culver H, Bunker CH, Kristensen V, Ness RB, Muir K, Edwards R, Meindl A, Heitz F, Matsuo K, du Bois A, Wu AH, Harter P, Teo SH, Schwaab I, Shu XO, Blot W, Hosono S, Kang D, Nakanishi T, Hartman M, Yatabe Y, Hamann U, Karlan BY, Sangrajrang S, Kjaer SK, Gaborieau V, Jensen A, Eccles D, Hogdall E, Shen CY, Brown J, Woo YL, Shah M, Azmi MA, Luben R, Omar SZ, Czene K, Vierkant RA, Nordestgaard BG, Flyger H, Vachon C, Olson JE, Wang X, Levine DA, Rudolph A, Weber RP, Flesch-Janys D, Iversen E, Nickels S, Schildkraut JM, Silva Idos S, Cramer DW, Gibson L, Terry KL, Fletcher O, Vitonis AF, van der Schoot CE, Poole EM, Hogervorst FB, Tworoger SS, Liu J, Bandera EV, Li J, Olson SH, Humphreys K, Orlow I, Blomqvist C, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Aittomaki K, Salvesen HB, Muranen TA, Wik E, Brouwers B, Krakstad C, Wauters E, Halle MK, Wildiers H, Kiemeney LA, Mulot C, Aben KK, Laurent-Puig P, Altena AM, Truong T, Massuger LF, Benitez J, Pejovic T, Perez JI, Hoatlin M, Zamora MP, Cook LS, Balasubramanian SP, Kelemen LE, Schneeweiss A, Le ND, Sohn C, Brooks-Wilson A, Tomlinson I, Kerin MJ, Miller N, Cybulski C, Henderson BE, Menkiszak J, Schumacher F, Wentzensen N, Le Marchand L, Yang HP, Mulligan AM, Glendon G, Engelholm SA, Knight JA, Hogdall CK, Apicella C, Gore M, Tsimiklis H, Song H, Southey MC, Jager A, den Ouweland AM, Brown R, Martens JW, Flanagan JM, Kriege M, Paul J, Margolin S, Siddiqui N, Severi G, Whittemore AS, Baglietto L, McGuire V, Stegmaier C, Sieh W, Muller H, Arndt V, Labreche F, Gao YT, Goldberg MS, Yang G, Dumont M, McLaughlin JR, Hartmann A, Ekici AB, Beckmann MW, Phelan CM, Lux MP, Permuth-Wey J, Peissel B, Sellers TA, Ficarazzi F, Barile M, Ziogas A, Ashworth A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Jones M, Ramus SJ, Orr N, Menon U, Pearce CL, Bruning T, Pike MC, Ko YD, Lissowska J, Figueroa J, Kupryjanczyk J, Chanock SJ, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Rzepecka IK, Pylkas K, Bidzinski M, Kauppila S, Hollestelle A, Seynaeve C, Tollenaar RA, Durda K, Jaworska K, Hartikainen JM, Kosma VM, Kataja V, Antonenkova NN, Long J, Shrubsole M, Deming-Halverson S, Lophatananon A, Siriwanarangsan P, Stewart-Brown S, Ditsch N, Lichtner P, Schmutzler RK, Ito H, Iwata H, Tajima K, Tseng CC, Stram DO, van den Berg D, Yip CH, Ikram MK, Teh YC, Cai H, Lu W, Signorello LB, Cai Q, Noh DY, Yoo KY, Miao H, Iau PT, Teo YY, McKay J, Shapiro C, Ademuyiwa F, Fountzilas G, Hsiung CN, Yu JC, Hou MF, Healey CS, Luccarini C, Peock S, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Peterlongo P, Rebbeck TR, Piedmonte M, Singer CF, Friedman E, Thomassen M, Offit K, Hansen TV, Neuhausen SL, Szabo CI, Blanco I, Garber J, Narod SA, Weitzel JN, Montagna M, Olah E, Godwin AK, Yannoukakos D, Goldgar DE, Caldes T, Imyanitov EN, Tihomirova L, Arun BK, Campbell I, Mensenkamp AR, van Asperen CJ, van Roozendaal KE, Meijers-Heijboer H, Collee JM, Oosterwijk JC, Hooning MJ, Rookus MA, van der Luijt RB, Os TA, Evans DG, Frost D, Fineberg E, Barwell J, Walker L, Kennedy MJ, Platte R, Davidson R, Ellis SD, Cole T, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Buecher B, Damiola F, Faivre L, Frenay M, Sinilnikova OM, Caron O, Giraud S, Mazoyer S, Bonadona V, Caux-Moncoutier V, Toloczko-Grabarek A, Gronwald J, Byrski T, Spurdle AB, Bonanni B, Zaffaroni D, Giannini G, Bernard L, Dolcetti R, Manoukian S, Arnold N, Engel C, Deissler H, Rhiem K, Niederacher D, Plendl H, Sutter C, Wappenschmidt B, Borg A, Melin B, Rantala J, Soller M, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Rodriguez GC, Salani R, Kaulich DG, Tea MK, Paluch SS, Laitman Y, Skytte AB, Kruse TA, Jensen UB, Robson M, Gerdes AM, Ejlertsen B, Foretova L, Savage SA, Lester J, Soucy P, Kuchenbaecker KB, Olswold C, Cunningham JM, Slager S, Pankratz VS, Dicks E, Lakhani SR, Couch FJ, Hall P, Monteiro AN, Gayther SA, Pharoah PD, Reddel RR, Goode EL, Greene MH, Easton DF, Berchuck A, Antoniou AC, Chenevix-Trench G, Dunning AM (2013) Multiple independent variants at the TERT locus are associated with telomere length and risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 45 (4): 371–384.
Cawthon RM (2002) Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 30 (10): e47.
Codd V, Mangino M, van der Harst P, Braund PS, Kaiser M, Beveridge AJ, Rafelt S, Moore J, Nelson C, Soranzo N, Zhai G, Valdes AM, Blackburn H, Mateo Leach I, de Boer RA, Kimura M, Aviv A, Goodall AH, Ouwehand W, van Veldhuisen DJ, van Gilst WH, Navis G, Burton PR, Tobin MD, Hall AS, Thompson JR, Spector T, Samani NJ (2010) Common variants near TERC are associated with mean telomere length. Nat Genet 42 (3): 197–199.
Codd V, Nelson CP, Albrecht E, Mangino M, Deelen J, Buxton JL, Hottenga JJ, Fischer K, Esko T, Surakka I, Broer L, Nyholt DR, Mateo Leach I, Salo P, Hagg S, Matthews MK, Palmen J, Norata GD, O'Reilly PF, Saleheen D, Amin N, Balmforth AJ, Beekman M, de Boer RA, Bohringer S, Braund PS, Burton PR, de Craen AJ, Denniff M, Dong Y, Douroudis K, Dubinina E, Eriksson JG, Garlaschelli K, Guo D, Hartikainen AL, Henders AK, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Kananen L, Karssen LC, Kettunen J, Klopp N, Lagou V, van Leeuwen EM, Madden PA, Magi R, Magnusson PK, Mannisto S, McCarthy MI, Medland SE, Mihailov E, Montgomery GW, Oostra BA, Palotie A, Peters A, Pollard H, Pouta A, Prokopenko I, Ripatti S, Salomaa V, Suchiman HE, Valdes AM, Verweij N, Vinuela A, Wang X, Wichmann HE, Widen E, Willemsen G, Wright MJ, Xia K, Xiao X, van Veldhuisen DJ, Catapano AL, Tobin MD, Hall AS, Blakemore AI, van Gilst WH, Zhu H, Consortium C, Erdmann J, Reilly MP, Kathiresan S, Schunkert H, Talmud PJ, Pedersen NL, Perola M, Ouwehand W, Kaprio J, Martin NG, van Duijn CM, Hovatta I, Gieger C, Metspalu A, Boomsma DI, Jarvelin MR, Slagboom PE, Thompson JR, Spector TD, van der Harst P, Samani NJ (2013) Identification of seven loci affecting mean telomere length and their association with disease. Nat Genet 45 (4): 422–427.
Cui Y, Cai Q, Qu S, Chow WH, Wen W, Xiang YB, Wu J, Rothman N, Yang G, Shu XO, Gao YT, Zheng W (2012) Association of leukocyte telomere length with colorectal cancer risk: nested case-control findings from the Shanghai Women's Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21 (10): 1807–1813.
Cunningham JM, Johnson RA, Litzelman K, Skinner HG, Seo S, Engelman CD, Vanderboom RJ, Kimmel GW, Gangnon RE, Riegert-Johnson DL, Baron JA, Potter JD, Haile R, Buchanan DD, Jenkins MA, Rider DN, Thibodeau SN, Petersen GM, Boardman LA (2013) Telomere length varies by DNA extraction method: implications for epidemiologic research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22 (11): 2047–2054.
Daniali L, Benetos A, Susser E, Kark JD, Labat C, Kimura M, Desai K, Granick M, Aviv A (2013) Telomeres shorten at equivalent rates in somatic tissues of adults. Nat Commun 4: 1597.
De Vivo I, Prescott J, Wong JY, Kraft P, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ (2009) A prospective study of relative telomere length and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18 (4): 1152–1156.
Ducray C, Pommier JP, Martins L, Boussin FD, Sabatier L (1999) Telomere dynamics, end-to-end fusions and telomerase activation during the human fibroblast immortalization process. Oncogene 18 (29): 4211–4223.
Giovannucci E, Michaud D (2007) The role of obesity and related metabolic disturbances in cancers of the colon, prostate, and pancreas. Gastroenterology 132 (6): 2208–2225.
Gu J, Wu X (2013) Re: short telomere length, cancer survival, and cancer risk in 47102 individuals. J Natl Cancer Inst 105 (15): 1157.
Han J, Qureshi AA, Prescott J, Guo Q, Ye L, Hunter DJ, De Vivo I (2009) A prospective study of telomere length and the risk of skin cancer. J Invest Dermatol 129 (2): 415–421.
Heaphy CM, Yoon GS, Peskoe SB, Joshu CE, Lee TK, Giovannucci E, Mucci LA, Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Hicks JL, De Marzo AM, Platz EA, Meeker AK (2013) Prostate cancer cell telomere length variability and stromal cell telomere length as prognostic markers for metastasis and death. Cancer Discov 3 (10): 1130–1141.
Hou L, Zhang X, Gawron AJ, Liu J (2012) Surrogate tissue telomere length and cancer risk: shorter or longer? Cancer Lett 319 (2): 130–135.
Jones AM, Beggs AD, Carvajal-Carmona L, Farrington S, Tenesa A, Walker M, Howarth K, Ballereau S, Hodgson SV, Zauber A, Bertagnolli M, Midgley R, Campbell H, Kerr D, Dunlop MG, Tomlinson IP (2012) TERC polymorphisms are associated both with susceptibility to colorectal cancer and with longer telomeres. Gut 61 (2): 248–254.
Kote-Jarai Z, Olama AA, Giles GG, Severi G, Schleutker J, Weischer M, Campa D, Riboli E, Key T, Gronberg H, Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Thun MJ, Ingles S, Chanock S, Albanes D, Hayes RB, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Pharoah P, Schumacher F, Henderson BE, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Sorensen KD, Dork T, Andriole G, Dickinson JL, Cybulski C, Lubinski J, Spurdle A, Clements JA, Chambers S, Aitken J, Gardiner RA, Thibodeau SN, Schaid D, John EM, Maier C, Vogel W, Cooney KA, Park JY, Cannon-Albright L, Brenner H, Habuchi T, Zhang HW, Lu YJ, Kaneva R, Muir K, Benlloch S, Leongamornlert DA, Saunders EJ, Tymrakiewicz M, Mahmud N, Guy M, O'Brien LT, Wilkinson RA, Hall AL, Sawyer EJ, Dadaev T, Morrison J, Dearnaley DP, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Khoo VS, Parker CC, Van As N, Woodhouse CJ, Thompson A, Christmas T, Ogden C, Cooper CS, Lophatonanon A, Southey MC, Hopper JL, English DR, Wahlfors T, Tammela TL, Klarskov P, Nordestgaard BG, Roder MA, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Bojesen SE, Travis R, Canzian F, Kaaks R, Wiklund F, Aly M, Lindstrom S, Diver WR, Gapstur S, Stern MC, Corral R, Virtamo J, Cox A, Haiman CA, Le Marchand L, Fitzgerald L, Kolb S, Kwon EM, Karyadi DM, Orntoft TF, Borre M, Meyer A, Serth J, Yeager M, Berndt SI, Marthick JR, Patterson B, Wokolorczyk D, Batra J, Lose F, McDonnell SK, Joshi AD, Shahabi A, Rinckleb AE, Ray A, Sellers TA, Lin HY, Stephenson RA, Farnham J, Muller H, Rothenbacher D, Tsuchiya N, Narita S, Cao GW, Slavov C, Mitev V, Easton DF, Eeles RA (2011) Seven prostate cancer susceptibility loci identified by a multi-stage genome-wide association study. Nat Genet 43 (8): 785–791.
Kote-Jarai Z, Saunders EJ, Leongamornlert DA, Tymrakiewicz M, Dadaev T, Jugurnauth-Little S, Ross-Adams H, Al Olama AA, Benlloch S, Halim S, Russell R, Dunning AM, Luccarini C, Dennis J, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Muir K, Giles GG, Severi G, Wiklund F, Gronberg H, Haiman CA, Schumacher F, Henderson BE, Le Marchand L, Lindstrom S, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Gapstur S, Chanock S, Berndt SI, Albanes D, Andriole G, Schleutker J, Weischer M, Canzian F, Riboli E, Key TJ, Travis RC, Campa D, Ingles SA, John EM, Hayes RB, Pharoah P, Khaw KT, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Signorello LB, Thibodeau SN, Schaid D, Maier C, Vogel W, Kibel AS, Cybulski C, Lubinski J, Cannon-Albright L, Brenner H, Park JY, Kaneva R, Batra J, Spurdle A, Clements JA, Teixeira MR, Govindasami K, Guy M, Wilkinson RA, Sawyer EJ, Morgan A, Dicks E, Baynes C, Conroy D, Bojesen SE, Kaaks R, Vincent D, Bacot F, Tessier DC, Easton DF, Eeles RA (2013) Fine-mapping identifies multiple prostate cancer risk loci at 5p15, one of which associates with TERT expression. Hum Mol Genet 22 (12): 2520–2528.
Lan Q, Cawthon R, Gao Y, Hu W, Hosgood HD 3rd, Barone-Adesi F, Ji BT, Bassig B, Chow WH, Shu X, Cai Q, Xiang Y, Berndt S, Kim C, Chanock S, Zheng W, Rothman N (2013) Longer telomere length in peripheral white blood cells is associated with risk of lung cancer and the rs2736100 (CLPTM1L-TERT) polymorphism in a prospective cohort study among women in China. PLoS One 8 (3): e59230.
Levy D, Neuhausen SL, Hunt SC, Kimura M, Hwang SJ, Chen W, Bis JC, Fitzpatrick AL, Smith E, Johnson AD, Gardner JP, Srinivasan SR, Schork N, Rotter JI, Herbig U, Psaty BM, Sastrasinh M, Murray SS, Vasan RS, Province MA, Glazer NL, Lu X, Cao X, Kronmal R, Mangino M, Soranzo N, Spector TD, Berenson GS, Aviv A (2010) Genome-wide association identifies OBFC1 as a locus involved in human leukocyte telomere biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107 (20): 9293–9298.
Lynch SM, Major JM, Cawthon R, Weinstein SJ, Virtamo J, Lan Q, Rothman N, Albanes D, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ (2013) A prospective analysis of telomere length and pancreatic cancer in the alpha-tocopherol beta-carotene cancer (ATBC) prevention study. Int J Cancer 133 (11): 2672–2680.
Mangino M, Hwang SJ, Spector TD, Hunt SC, Kimura M, Fitzpatrick AL, Christiansen L, Petersen I, Elbers CC, Harris T, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Kark JD, Benetos A, El Shamieh S, Visvikis-Siest S, Christensen K, Berenson GS, Valdes AM, Vinuela A, Garcia M, Arnett DK, Broeckel U, Province MA, Pankow JS, Kammerer C, Liu Y, Nalls M, Tishkoff S, Thomas F, Ziv E, Psaty BM, Bis JC, Rotter JI, Taylor KD, Smith E, Schork NJ, Levy D, Aviv A (2012) Genome-wide meta-analysis points to CTC1 and ZNF676 as genes regulating telomere homeostasis in humans. Hum Mol Genet 21 (24): 5385–5394.
Mirabello L, Huang WY, Wong JY, Chatterjee N, Reding D, Crawford ED, De Vivo I, Hayes RB, Savage SA (2009) The association between leukocyte telomere length and cigarette smoking, dietary and physical variables, and risk of prostate cancer. Aging Cell 8 (4): 405–413.
Platz EA, Clinton SK, Giovannucci E (2008) Association between plasma cholesterol and prostate cancer in the PSA era. Int J Cancer 123 (7): 1693–1698.
Pooley KA, Bojesen SE, Weischer M, Nielsen SF, Thompson D, Amin Al Olama A, Michailidou K, Tyrer JP, Benlloch S, Brown J, Audley T, Luben R, Khaw KT, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Kote-Jarai Z, Baynes C, Shah M, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dennis J, Dicks E, Yang R, Rudolph A, Schildkraut J, Chang-Claude J, Burwinkel B, Chenevix-Trench G, Pharoah PD, Berchuck A, Eeles RA, Easton DF, Dunning AM, Nordestgaard BG (2013) A genome-wide association scan (GWAS) for mean telomere length within the COGS project: identified loci show little association with hormone-related cancer risk. Hum Mol Genet 22 (24): 5056–5064.
Pooley KA, Sandhu MS, Tyrer J, Shah M, Driver KE, Luben RN, Bingham SA, Ponder BA, Pharoah PD, Khaw KT, Easton DF, Dunning AM (2010) Telomere length in prospective and retrospective cancer case-control studies. Cancer Res 70 (8): 3170–3176.
Prescott J, Du M, Wong JY, Han J, De Vivo I (2012) Paternal age at birth is associated with offspring leukocyte telomere length in the nurses' health study. Hum Reprod 27 (12): 3622–3631.
Prescott J, Kraft P, Chasman DI, Savage SA, Mirabello L, Berndt SI, Weissfeld JL, Han J, Hayes RB, Chanock SJ, Hunter DJ, De Vivo I (2011) Genome-wide association study of relative telomere length. PloS One 6 (5): e19635.
Rafnar T, Sulem P, Stacey SN, Geller F, Gudmundsson J, Sigurdsson A, Jakobsdottir M, Helgadottir H, Thorlacius S, Aben KK, Blondal T, Thorgeirsson TE, Thorleifsson G, Kristjansson K, Thorisdottir K, Ragnarsson R, Sigurgeirsson B, Skuladottir H, Gudbjartsson T, Isaksson HJ, Einarsson GV, Benediktsdottir KR, Agnarsson BA, Olafsson K, Salvarsdottir A, Bjarnason H, Asgeirsdottir M, Kristinsson KT, Matthiasdottir S, Sveinsdottir SG, Polidoro S, Hoiom V, Botella-Estrada R, Hemminki K, Rudnai P, Bishop DT, Campagna M, Kellen E, Zeegers MP, de Verdier P, Ferrer A, Isla D, Vidal MJ, Andres R, Saez B, Juberias P, Banzo J, Navarrete S, Tres A, Kan D, Lindblom A, Gurzau E, Koppova K, de Vegt F, Schalken JA, van der Heijden HF, Smit HJ, Termeer RA, Oosterwijk E, van Hooij O, Nagore E, Porru S, Steineck G, Hansson J, Buntinx F, Catalona WJ, Matullo G, Vineis P, Kiltie AE, Mayordomo JI, Kumar R, Kiemeney LA, Frigge ML, Jonsson T, Saemundsson H, Barkardottir RB, Jonsson E, Jonsson S, Olafsson JH, Gulcher JR, Masson G, Gudbjartsson DF, Kong A, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K (2009) Sequence variants at the TERT-CLPTM1L locus associate with many cancer types. Nat Genet 41 (2): 221–227.
Savage SA, Gadalla SM, Chanock SJ (2013) The long and short of telomeres and cancer association studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 105 (7): 448–449.
Shen M, Cawthon R, Rothman N, Weinstein SJ, Virtamo J, Hosgood HD 3rd, Hu W, Lim U, Albanes D, Lan Q (2011) A prospective study of telomere length measured by monochrome multiplex quantitative PCR and risk of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 73 (2): 133–137.
Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Dysert DC, Lipnick R, Rosner B, Hennekens CH (1984) Test of the National Death Index. Am J Epidemiol 119 (5): 837–839.
Wang H, Chen H, Gao X, McGrath M, Deer D, De Vivo I, Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A (2008) Telomere length and risk of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 23 (2): 302–305.
Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Cawthon RM, Freiberg JJ, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Bojesen SE (2013) Short telomere length, cancer survival, and cancer risk in 47102 individuals. J Natl Cancer Inst 105 (7): 459–468.
Wentzensen IM, Mirabello L, Pfeiffer RM, Savage SA (2011) The association of telomere length and cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20 (6): 1238–1250.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants and staff of the Health Professionals Follow-up Study for their valuable contributions, as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. We would like to acknowledge Pati Soule, Esther Orr and Hardeep Ranu for their laboratory assistance. The Health Professionals Follow-up Study is supported by an infrastructure grant from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (UM1 CA167552). BJ is also supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare; IM is supported by a Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program fellowship; IDV is supported by grant R01 CA082838 and EG is supported by grant R01 CA133891 from the National Cancer Institute. EAP and AKM were supported by a Department of Defense Idea Development Award (PC040872 W81XWH-05-1-0030).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on British Journal of Cancer website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Julin, B., Shui, I., Heaphy, C. et al. Circulating leukocyte telomere length and risk of overall and aggressive prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 112, 769–776 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.640
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.640
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
NRF2 signaling pathway and telomere length in aging and age-related diseases
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2023)
-
Depression, Religiosity, and Telomere Length in the Study on Stress, Spirituality, and Health (SSSH)
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (2022)
-
Telomere-based risk models for the early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2021)
-
Association between prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length and breast cancer risk: the Singapore Chinese Health Study
Breast Cancer Research (2019)
-
Paternal Age and Transgenerational Telomere Length Maintenance: A Simulation Model
Scientific Reports (2019)