Skip to main content
Log in

Cultural Sensitivity and Adaptation in Family-Based Prevention Interventions

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the substantial impact of families on the developmental trajectories of children, family interventions should be a critical ingredient in comprehensive prevention programs. Very few family interventions have been adapted to be culturally sensitive for different ethnic groups. This paper examines the research literature on whether culturally adapting family interventions improves retention and outcome effectiveness. Because of limited research on the topic, the prevention research field is divided on the issue. Factors to consider for cultural adaptations of family-focused prevention are presented. Five research studies testing the effectiveness of the generic version of the Strengthening Families Program (SFP) compared to culturally-adapted versions for African Americans, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian families suggest that cultural adaptations made by practitioners that reduce dosage or eliminate critical core content can increase retention by up to 40%, but reduce positive outcomes. Recommendations include the need for additional research on culturally-sensitive family interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aktan, G., Kumpfer, K. L., & Turner, C. (1996). Effectiveness of a family skills training program for substance abuse prevention with inner city African-American families. International Journal of the Addictions, 31, 158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A., & Metzler, C. (1999). A public health perspective for research on family-focused interventions. In R. Ashery, E. Robertson, & K. Kumpfer (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention through family interventions (National Institute of Drug Abuse Research Monograph on family-focused prevention research). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., Diaz, T., & Botvin, E. M. (1995). Effectiveness of culturally-focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Two-year follow-up results. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd-Franklin, N. (1989). Block families in therapy:Amulti-systems approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd-Franklin, N. (2001). Reaching out to larger systems. In interventions with multi-cultural families (Part 2). The Family Psychologist, 17(3), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J. D., Krenz, C., Gilmore, M., Morrison, D., Wells, E., & Abbott, R. (1993). Using research to guide culturally appropriate drug abuse prevention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(5), 804–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes, R. C. (1993). The Hispanic family intervention program: An empirical approach to substance abuse prevention. In R. S. Mayers, B. L. Kail, & T. D. Watts (Eds.), Hispanic substance abuse (pp. 157-173). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J., Watt, N., Hawkins, S., Ramey, S., Markman, H., Long, B., & West, S. (1991, June). Prevention research: Conceptual model of strategies and procedures. Paper presented at the National Prevention Conference sponsored by NIMH, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, C. W., Sussman, S., Ellickson, P., Brown, P., & Richardson, J. (1996). Is Current Drug Abuse Prevention Programming Generalizable Across Ethnic Groups? American Behavioral Scientist, 39(7), 911–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1997). Effective recruitment for parenting programs within ethnic minority communities. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 14(1), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameoka, V. A. (1996). The effects of a family-focused intervention on reducing risk for substance abuse among Asian and Pacific-Island youths and families: Evaluation of the Strengthening Hawaii's Families Project. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Social Welfare Evaluation and Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1993). Adolescent mental health: Prevention and treatment programs. American Psychologist, 48(2), 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., & Alvarado, R. (1995). Strengthening families to prevent drug use in multi-ethnic youth. In G. Botvin, S. Schinke, & M. Orlandi (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention with multi-ethnic youth (pp. 253–292). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., & DeMarsh, J. P. (1985). Prevention of chemical dependency in children of alcohol and drug abusers. NIDA Notes, 5, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., DeMarsh, J. P., & Child, W. (1989). Strengthening Families Program: Children's Skill Training Curriculum Manual (prevention services to children of substance-abusing parents). Salt Lake City: Department of Health, Alcohol and Drug Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., Molgaard, V., & Spoth, R. (1996). The Strengthening Families Program for prevention of delinquency and drug use in special populations. In R. De V Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency: Prevention and early intervention approaches. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., & Turner, C. W. (1990-1991). The social ecology model of adolescent substance abuse: Implications for prevention. The International Journal of the Addictions, 25(4A), 435–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., Wamberg, K., & Martinez, D. (1996). Strengthening Hispanic Families Program. Paper presented at the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, High Risk Youth Conference, Washington, DC.

  • Kumpfer, K. L., & Whiteside, H. O. (2000). Strengthening Families Program. Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick, M., & Giordano, J. (1996). Ethnicity and family therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. J. (1999). Parent training. In S. W. Russ & T. H. Ollendick (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapies with children and families (pp. 153–180). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, M. (2001). Working with Asian American families. In interventions with multi-cultural families (Part 2). The Family Psychologist, 17(3), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, M. D. (1995). Drug use etiology among ethnic minority adolescents: Risk and protective factors. In G. Botvin, S. Shinke, & M. A. Orlandi (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention with multiethnic youth. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnicow, K., Soler, R., Braithwaite, R., Ahulwalia, J., & Butler, J. (2000). Cultural sensitivity in substance use prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. R. (2000). Community-based parenting and family support interventions and the prevention of drug abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 25(6), 929–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santisteban, D. A., Muir-Malcom, J. A., Mitrani, J. B., & Szapocznik, J. (2001). Integrating the study of ethnic culture and family psychology intervention science. In H. A. Liddle, D. A. Santisteban, R. F Levant, & J. H. Bray (Eds.), Family psychology: Science-based interventions (pp. 331–351). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Guyll, M., & Day, S. X. (2002). Universal familyfocused interventions in alcohol-use disorder prevention: Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of two interventions. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(2), 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. K., & Biglan, A. (1998). Behavioral family interventions for improving child rearing:Areview of the literature for clinicians and policy makers. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, N. S., & Kumpfer, K. L. (2000). Meta-analysis of Family Based Strengthening Programs. Report to CSAP/SAMHSA, Rockville, MD.

  • Tobler, N., & Stratton, H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18(1), 71–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W. (2000). Cultural considerations in family-based primary prevention programs in drug abuse. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21(3), 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C., Sales, L., & Sambrano, S. (1998). Predictors of substance abuse in the High Risk Youth grantee study. Presentation at CSAP High Risk Youth Grantee Conference.

  • Weinberger, D. A., Tublin, S. K., Ford, M. E., & Feldman, S. S. (1990). Preadolescents' social-emotional adjustment and selective attrition in family research. Child Development, 61, 1374–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, L., & Smith, J. (2001). Outcomes of a culturally-modified family program for Ojibway Indian families.Washington, DC: Society for Prevention Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L., & Mock, M. (1997). Developmental and life cycle issues of Asian Americans: Asian American young adults. In E. Lee (Ed.), Working with Asian Americans: A guide for Clinicians (pp. 196–207). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumpfer, K.L., Alvarado, R., Smith, P. et al. Cultural Sensitivity and Adaptation in Family-Based Prevention Interventions. Prev Sci 3, 241–246 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019902902119

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019902902119

Navigation