Skip to main content
Log in

The use of quality of life data in clinical practice

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large amount of quality of life (QoL) information has been and is being collected in the oncology setting but it is unclear how such data influence decisions about the management of individual patients. A questionnaire designed specifically for the study was mailed to 260 senior oncologists to investigate how QoL data are being used outside the context of cancer clinical trials; replies were received from 154 (59%). Approximately 80% believed QoL information should be collected prior to the commencement of treatment, but less than 50% actually did so. Similarly, less than 50% assessed QoL as a method of monitoring the responses to treatment even when the treatment goal was palliation. The barriers to collecting such data were time and resource constraints, perceived lack of an appropriate instrument and a belief that QoL assessments were unnecessary. Other than making a subjective assessment based on examination and history, 73 (47%) used either standardized questionnaires or a system derived in their unit to assess the QoL of their patients. Given an appropriate instrument the majority believed that QoL data could be collected on a routine basis. The main barriers to collecting QoL data are logistic and the challenge remains to develop a method of collecting and analysing QoL information in a manner which enhances decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes J. Cancer and Emotion. Psychological Preludes and Reactions to Cancer. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morrow G, Dobkin P. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment: prevalence, etiology and behavioral interventions. Clin Psychol Rev 1988; 8: 517–556.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greer S. Psycho-oncology: its aims, achievements and future tasks. Psycho-Oncology 1994; 3: 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sprangers M, Te Velde A, Aaronson N, Taal B. Quality of life following surgery for colorectal cancer: literature review. Psycho-Oncology 1993; 2: 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maguire P, Brooke M, Tait A, Thomas C, Sellwood R. The effect of counselling on physical disability and social recovery after mastectomy. Clin Oncol 1983; 9: 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Watson M, Denton S, Baum M, Greer S. Counselling breast cancer patients: a specialist nurse service. Counsel Psychol Quart 1988; 1: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maguire P, Faulkner A. Improve the counselling skills of doctors and nurses in cancer care. BMJ 1988; 297: 847–849.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maguire P, Faulkner A. Communicate with cancer patients: 1. Handling bad news and difficult questions. BMJ 1988; 297: 907–909.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greer S, Moorey S, Baruch J et al. Adjuvant psychological therapy for patients with cancer: a prospective randomised trial. BMJ 1992; 304: 675–680.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aaronson N. Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured? Oncology 1988; 2: 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson R, Aaronson N, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Measuring the effect of cancer on health-related quality of life. PharmacoEconomics 1995; 7: 308–319.

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Holten-Verzantvoort A, Zwinderman A, Aaronson N et al. The effect of supportive pamidronate treatment on aspects of quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 544–549.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hurny C, Bernhard J, Gelber R et al. Qualify of life measures for patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: an international trial. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28: 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morris J, Goddard M. Economic evaluation and quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials: the CHART trial. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29A: 766–770.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ganz P. Quality of life and the patient with cancer. Individual and policy implications. Cancer 1994; 74: 1445–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gough I, Dalgleish L. What value is given to quality of life assessment by health professionals considering response to palliative chemotherapy for advanced cancer? Cancer 1991; 68: 220–225.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor K, Macdonald K, Bezjak A, Ng P, DePetrillo A. Physicians' perspective on quality of life: an exploratory study of oncologists. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, J., Perez, D. & McNoe, B. The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 7, 85–91 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008893007068

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008893007068

Navigation