Elsevier

Women's Health Issues

Volume 21, Issue 1, January–February 2011, Pages 40-47
Women's Health Issues

Original article
Health Status, Health Service Use, and Satisfaction According to Sexual Identity of Young Australian Women

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2010.08.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

We sought to compare physical and mental health status, health service use, and satisfaction among young Australian women of varying sexual identity; and to explore associations of all of these variables with satisfaction with their general practitioner (GP).

Methods

Data are from the youngest cohort of women in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health surveyed in 2003. The sample included women aged 25 to 30 who identified as exclusively heterosexual (n = 8,083; 91.3%), mainly heterosexual (n = 568; 6.4%), bisexual (n = 100; 1.1%), or lesbian (n = 99; 1.1%). Univariate analyses compared self-reported mental health, physical health, access to GP services, and satisfaction across the four sexual identity groups. Linear regression, controlling for education, income, and residence, was used to identify factors associated with GP satisfaction.

Results

Sexual minority women (lesbian, bisexual, and mainly heterosexual) were significantly more likely than were heterosexual women to report poorer mental health and to have more frequently used health services; depression was strongly associated with mental health services use. Bisexual and mainly heterosexual women were most likely to report poorer general health, abnormal Pap tests, sexually transmissible infections, urinary tract infections, hepatitis B or C virus infection, and asthma. Lesbians were most likely to have never had a Pap test or be underscreened. All sexual minority women had lower continuity of GP care and lower satisfaction with that care than heterosexual women.

Conclusion

Underlying social determinants of physical and mental health disparities experienced by sexual minority women require exploration, including the possible effects of discrimination and marginalization on higher levels of risk taking. Lower continuity of care and lower satisfaction with GP services also need further investigation.

Introduction

Health service use and satisfaction by lesbian and bisexual women is of particular interest because their health status is consistently reported to be poorer than that of heterosexual women. By rights, poorer health status should result in higher use of health services. Herein we have presented a secondary analysis of the young cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH) in which we focus on health status, access, and satisfaction according to sexual identity.

Population-based studies show that lesbian and bisexual women have higher rates of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and substance use than their heterosexual counterparts. Such evidence comes from studies conducted with adult samples in the United States (Gilman et al., 2001, McCabe et al., 2009, Wilsnack et al., 2008), The Netherlands (Sandfort et al., 2006, Sandfort et al., 2001), the United Kingdom (Mercer et al., 2007), and Australia (Hillier et al., 2003, McNair et al., 2005), and with youth in New Zealand (Fergusson, Horwood, & Beautrais, 1999). A recent systematic review on mental health and substance use reiterates these findings (King et al., 2008).

Physical health has not been investigated to the same extent as mental health. However, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease and cancers is posited to be higher among lesbian and bisexual women due to higher risk factors (smoking, alcohol, obesity; Aaron et al., 2001), nulliparity, reduced cancer screening, and reduced contraceptive pill use (Cochran et al., 2001, Dibble et al., 2004). Lower rates of cervical, breast, and cardiovascular screening have been found in population-based studies in the United States (Cochran et al., 2001, Diamant et al., 2000, Valanis et al., 2000) and Canada (Tjepkema, 2008). There is a some evidence suggesting higher rates of sexually transmissible infections among bisexually active women (Mercer et al., 2007), and higher levels of heart disease among lesbians (Diamant et al., 2000). Sandfort et al (2006) found that lesbian and gay adults were more likely than heterosexual adults to report acute physical symptoms and chronic physical conditions, although when mental health status was controlled, only chronic conditions were significantly different. Other investigators have found that higher rates of physical health problems among lesbian and bisexual women were largely mediated by higher levels of distress (Cochran & Mays, 2007).

Health care access varies according to the country and health care system studied. Data from the U.S. National Health Interview Survey (n = 93,418) showed that women in same-sex relationships (n = 614) were about one half as likely as women in heterosexual relationships to have seen a doctor in the previous 12 months or to have a regular source of care (Heck, Sell, & Gorin, 2006). These findings replicate the predominantly U.S.-based literature over the last 2 decades that suggests lower levels of access among lesbians (Banks and Gartrell, 1996, Clark et al., 2001, Mravcak, 2006), and even lower access among bisexual women (Rogers, Emanuel, & Bradford, 2003). Barriers to accessing U.S. health services have been summarized as limited heath insurance and next-of-kin rights, an inadequate number of providers competent in minority sexual orientation issues, a lack of specific prevention services, and a preference not to disclose sexual orientation (Mayer et al., 2008). A Canadian national probability survey compared health care use in 83,723 heterosexual, 695 lesbian, and 833 bisexual women and also found that lesbians were less likely to have seen a GP in the previous 12 months and less likely to have a regular doctor (Tjepkema, 2008). By contrast, lesbian and bisexual women were more likely to see a mental health care provider than were heterosexuals in the Canadian study (Tjepkema, 2008), and this was also found in a population-based Californian study (Grella, Greenwell, Mays, & Cochran, 2009). A large Dutch survey within 104 general practices completed by 9,684 patients, 1.5% of whom were lesbian and 1.2% bisexual, showed that “homosexuals” had a greater usage of physical and mental health care services (Bakker, Sandfort, Vanwesenbeeck, van Lindert, & Westert, 2006). To date, there has been no population-based Australian data published on access to health care among sexual minority women.

Levels of satisfaction with health care are consistently found to be lower for lesbian and bisexual women than heterosexual women, regardless of study location or sampling method (Diamant et al., 2000, Tjepkema, 2008). Reasons for dissatisfaction, particularly among north American samples, often relate to difficulty accessing health care (Diamant et al., 2000, Mathieson et al., 2002), and unmet health care needs (Tjepkema, 2008). Poor communication by providers including assumptions of heterosexuality is also implicated (Bonvicini & Perlin, 2003). Dissatisfaction can result from, or lead to, reluctance to disclose sexual orientation (Meckler, Elliott, Kanouse, Beals, & Schuster, 2006). Conversely, satisfaction with health care is found to be greater when providers and services are more culturally competent regarding minority sexual orientation (Hutchinson et al., 2006, Mayer et al., 2008, Polek et al., 2008).

The primary question addressed in this paper is whether health service usage and satisfaction differ based on sexual identity. We also present analyses of mental and physical health status and their association with differences in health care use and satisfaction. Based on previous literature, we posit two hypotheses: 1) that sexual minority women report greater use of health services than heterosexual women owing to their poorer health status; and 2) that satisfaction with care is lower among sexual minority women than among heterosexual women.

Section snippets

Participants

The study sample is from the third survey of the young cohort of women in the ALSWH. The ALSWH is a prospective, longitudinal study that has collected health data from three age cohorts of women via self-completed questionnaires every 3 years since 1996. The ALSWH sample was selected randomly from the database of Medicare Australia, the universal provider of government funded health insurance for all Australians. The younger cohort of women was 18 to 23 years old at baseline (n = 14,247), and

Sample Demographics

Sociodemographic characteristics differed significantly across the four sexual identity groups (Table 1). Mainly heterosexual women were most similar to heterosexual women in education and income, but most similar to bisexual women with regard to relationship, parental, and residential status. Bisexual women had the lowest levels of education and income (p < .01), were most likely of all four groups to have a Health Care Card (p < .001), and the least likely to have private health insurance (p

Discussion

Our finding of poorer mental health among minority sexual identity women has also been described in several other population-based studies. Conversely, the finding of poorer physical health, higher stress, and lower life satisfaction has not been described for Australian women, and is rarely described elsewhere. Although some observed differences in physical health are small (e.g., general health), we contend that given the young age of the sample and given the consistent pattern of results,

Conclusion

Results of this study have important implications, particularly for primary health care providers. Findings should raise awareness of the risks of health inequalities among sexual minority women, as well as the need for culturally sensitive approaches that encourage continuity of care. Poorer health status among sexual minority women requires further research to more fully understand reasons underlying these health disparities. Apart from the lower need for reproductive services, there is no

Acknowledgments

The research on which this paper is based was conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, The University of Newcastle and The University of Queensland. We are grateful to the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing for funding and to the women who provided the survey data.

We are grateful to the Lesbian Health Fund, USA, for providing us with a grant to enable this analysis and subsequent paper.

Ruth McNair is a Senior Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Programs at the Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Australia. She is Chairperson of the Victorian Ministerial Advisory Committee on GLBTI Health and Wellbeing, and a practicing GP.

References (47)

  • J.V. Bailey et al.

    Sexually transmitted infections in women who have sex with women

    Sexually Transmitted Infections

    (2004)
  • A. Banks et al.

    Lesbians in the medical setting

  • S. Bell et al.

    Development of the perceived stress questionnaire for young women. Psychology

    Health and Medicine

    (2002)
  • W.J. Brown et al.

    Women’s Health Australia: Recruitment for a national longitudinal cohort study

    Women and Health

    (1998)
  • M.E. Clark et al.

    The GLBT health access project: A State-funded effort to improve access to care

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2001)
  • S.D. Cochran et al.

    Physical health complaints among lesbians, gay men, and bisexual and homosexually experienced heterosexual individuals: Results from the California Quality of Life Survey

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2007)
  • S.D. Cochran et al.

    Cancer-related risk indicators and preventive screening behaviors among lesbians and bisexual women

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2001)
  • D. Fergusson et al.

    Is sexual orientation related to mental health problems and suicidality in young people?

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • K. Fethers et al.

    Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviours in women who have sex with women

    Sexually Transmitted Infections

    (2000)
  • S.E. Gilman et al.

    Risk of psychiatric disorders among individuals reporting same-sex sexual partners in the National Comorbidity Survey

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2001)
  • C. Grella et al.

    Influence of gender, sexual orientation, and need on treatment utilization for substance use and mental disorders: Findings from the California Quality of Life Survey

    BMC Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • J.E. Heck et al.

    Health care access among individuals involved in same-sex relationships

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2006)
  • L. Hillier et al.

    The association between licit and illicit drug use and sexuality in young Australian women

    Medical Journal of Australia

    (2003)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Sexual Orientation Differences in Pregnancy and Abortion Across the Lifecourse

      2020, Women's Health Issues
      Citation Excerpt :

      The increased risks of abortion and teen pregnancy among completely heterosexual women with same-sex partners, mostly heterosexual, and bisexual participants compared with their exclusively heterosexual peers also suggest an opportunity for improved contraceptive access and contraceptive counseling for sexual minority women (Charlton et al., 2019). Previous research has found that sexual minority women are less likely to access sexual and reproductive health services (Agénor, Krieger, Austin, Haneuse, & Gottlieb, 2014b,a; Brown, McNair, Szalacha, Livingston, & Hughes, 2015; Buchmueller & Carpenter, 2010; Charlton et al., 2011; McNair, Szalacha, & Hughes, 2011; Tjepkema, 2008), and often face discriminatory interactions in these settings (Levy, 1996; Sinding, Barnoff, & Grassau, 2004; Trettin, Moses-Kolko, & Wisner, 2006). On the provider side, limited LGBT-specific training opportunities may result in problematic provider assumptions about the sexual and reproductive health needs of sexual minority women (Abdessamad, Yudin, Tarasoff, Radford, & Ross, 2013; Fuzzell, Fedesco, Alexander, Fortenberry, & Shields, 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Ruth McNair is a Senior Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Programs at the Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Australia. She is Chairperson of the Victorian Ministerial Advisory Committee on GLBTI Health and Wellbeing, and a practicing GP.

    Laura A. Szalacha is a Research Associate Professor at Arizona State University (ASU), College of Nursing & Health Innovation, where she serves as a statistician and methodologist. She also teaches statistics and research methods.

    Tonda Hughes is Professor and Interim Department Head of Health Systems Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), College of Nursing. She is also Director of Research for the UIC National Center of Excellence in Women's Health.

    A grant was obtained from the Lesbian Health Fund of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, USA, to support this research.

    View full text