Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 31, Issue 40, 13 September 2013, Pages 4293-4304
Vaccine

Review
A systematic review of interventions for reducing parental vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Unvaccinated individuals put communities at risk of disease.

  • Parental vaccine refusal and hesitance is an emerging issue.

  • We conducted a systematic review for interventions to reduce refusal/hesitance.

  • We found limited evidence on effective strategies to guide policy makers.

  • There is a need for appropriately designed, executed and evaluated intervention studies.

Abstract

Unvaccinated individuals pose a public health threat to communities. Research has identified many factors associated with parental vaccine refusal and hesitancy toward childhood and adolescent immunizations. However, data on the effectiveness of interventions to address parental refusal are limited. We conducted a systematic review of four online databases to identify interventional studies.

We used criteria recommended by the WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on immunization (SAGE) for the quality assessment of studies. Intervention categories and outcomes were evaluated for each body of evidence and confidence in overall estimates of effect was determined. There is limited evidence to guide implementation of effective strategies to deal with the emerging threat of parental vaccine refusal. There is a need for appropriately designed, executed and evaluated intervention studies to address this gap in knowledge.

Introduction

The success of vaccines in reducing disease-associated mortality is second only to the introduction of safe drinking water [2]. According to estimates by the World Health Organization, vaccines for diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and measles save between two and three million lives every year. The continued success of vaccines relies on adequate immunization coverage which in turn requires parental willingness to vaccinate children. There has been an increase in concerns about real or perceived vaccine adverse events among parents in the developed world making them uneasy about the decision to vaccinate their children, described as ‘vaccine hesitancy’ in the literature [3], [4]. This is one of the reasons that may lead parents to seek alternative or delayed vaccination schedules, or they may refuse vaccinations altogether. Individuals who remain unvaccinated put communities at risk of disease outbreaks [5], [6]. Although a large body of literature has called for increasing vaccination rates among parents who refuse to vaccinate their children [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], there is a dearth of studies that evaluate interventions to achieve this goal.

Over the past few years, there has been a paradigm shift in the developed world from efforts to increase access to immunizations, to improving their uptake. With regards to the particular issue of vaccine refusal, many studies have explored parents’ attitudes toward immunization [12], [13], their sources of information [14] for decision making, and their reasons for refusing childhood immunizations. Parents’ beliefs about the contraindications and perceived dangers of immunization contribute to their unwillingness to expose healthy children to inoculums [15], [16], [17], [18]. Research studies on cognitive decision making processes report that parents prefer the risks of errors of omission (contracting a disease naturally) over the risks of errors of commission (suffering from vaccine adverse events) [17], [19]. Parents may also believe that they can control their child's susceptibility to a disease and its outcome [17]. In addition, some parents who are opposed to conventional medicine believe that it is more beneficial for children to recover from diseases than receive vaccines for them [20]. Parents may also refuse on religious grounds [18] or because they hold ethical objections to state laws that mandate vaccines [21]. Despite the existence of this vast knowledge base to help us understand parental concerns, there are few comprehensive and systematic reviews on effective interventions for reducing parental vaccine refusal. We therefore conducted a systematic review to amass and evaluate the literature on interventions to decrease parental vaccine refusal and hesitancy toward recommended childhood and adolescent vaccines.

Section snippets

Search strategy and selection criteria

We conducted a systematic literature search from July through September 2012 in four databases: PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE and PsychInfo. An empirical search was run on Google Scholar to identify the commonly used MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and keywords linked to relevant articles. We selected the following MeSH: parents; caregivers; infant; child; preschool child; adolescent; young adult; vaccination; mass vaccination; immunization programs; Papillomavirus infections/prevention and

Results

Results of the search strategy are summarized in Fig. 1. Thirty studies were included in the final review. Study characteristics are summarized in Summary Table 1. Most studies (13) used a before-after intervention design and the remaining were RCTs (3), NRCTs (7) and evaluation studies (6). Most studies (25) were from the US. For ease of analysis, we categorized interventions into three groups: passage of state laws (introduction of personal belief/philosophical exemption laws for school

Discussion

Our systematic review did not reveal any convincing evidence on effective interventions to address parental vaccine hesitancy and refusal. We found a large number of studies that evaluated interventions for increasing immunization coverage rates such as the use of reminder/recall systems [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], parent [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], community-wide [68], [72], [73], [74], and provider-based [75], [76], [77], [78], [79] education and incentives [80], [81],

Acknowledgments

Alina Sadaf had access to all of the data in the study and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analyses. The corresponding author, Saad B. Omer, also had full access to the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Contributors: Alina Sadaf and Jennifer L. Richards were involved in data collection and interpretation, and manuscript writing. Jason Glanz and Daniel A. Salmon were involved in data interpretation

References (111)

  • N.P. Klein et al.

    Differential maternal responses to a newly developed vaccine information pamphlet

    Vaccine

    (2009)
  • L. Gillespie et al.

    The acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccine among parents and guardians of newborn to 10-year-old children

    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol

    (2011)
  • E.F. Dini et al.

    The impact of computer-generated messages on childhood immunization coverage

    Am J Prev Med

    (2000)
  • P.A. Briss et al.

    Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services

    Am J Prev Med

    (2000)
  • M.T. Lieber et al.

    Childhood immunizations: a parent education and incentive program

    J Pediatr Health Care

    (2003)
  • G. Fairbrother et al.

    Impact of financial incentives on documented immunization rates in the inner city: results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ambul Pediatr

    (2001)
  • J. Abrevaya et al.

    Effectiveness of state-level vaccination mandates: evidence from the varicella vaccine

    J Health Econ

    (2011)
  • L. Bond et al.

    Increases in vaccination coverage for children in child care, 1997 to 2000: an evaluation of the impact of government incentives and initiatives

    Aust N Z J Public Health

    (2002)
  • M.M. Davis et al.

    Associations of daycare and school entry vaccination requirements with varicella immunization rates

    Vaccine

    (2005)
  • E. Olshen et al.

    The impact of state policies on vaccine coverage by age 13 in an insured population

    J Adolesc Health

    (2007)
  • T.R. Wilson et al.

    The impact of a school entry law on adolescent immunization rates

    J Adolesc Health

    (2005)
  • T. May et al.

    ‘Clustering of exemptions’ as a collective action threat to herd immunity

    Vaccine

    (2003)
  • S. Plotkin et al.

    Vaccines

    (2008)
  • R.T. Chen et al.

    Vaccine safety: current and future challenges

    Pediatr. Ann.

    (1998)
  • D.R. Feikin et al.

    Individual and community risks of measles and pertussis associated with personal exemptions to immunization

    J Am Med Assoc

    (2000)
  • D.A. Salmon et al.

    Health consequences of religious and philosophical exemptions from immunization laws

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1999)
  • D.S. Diekema

    Responding to parental refusals of immunization of children

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • D.S. Diekema

    Improving childhood vaccination rates

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • J.M. Glanz et al.

    Parental refusal of pertussis vaccination is associated with an increased risk of pertussis infection in children

    Pediatrics

    (2009)
  • S.B. Omer et al.

    Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • S. Stokley et al.

    Adolescent vaccination-coverage levels in the United States: 2006–2009

    Pediatrics

    (2011)
  • D.D. Fredrickson et al.

    Childhood immunization refusal: provider and parent perceptions

    Fam Med – Kansas City

    (2004)
  • D. Gust et al.

    Immunization attitudes and beliefs among parents: beyond a dichotomous perspective

    Am J Health Behav

    (2005)
  • P.J. Smith et al.

    Association between health care providers’ influence on parents who have concerns about vaccine safety and vaccination coverage

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • H. Bedford et al.

    Concerns about immunisation

    Br Med J.

    (2000)
  • N. Begg et al.

    Myths in medicine. Immunisation

    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)

    (1994)
  • R. Prislin et al.

    Immunization status and sociodemographic characteristics: the mediating role of beliefs, attitudes, and perceived control

    Am J Public Health

    (1998)
  • L.K. Ball et al.

    Risky business: challenges in vaccine risk communication

    Pediatrics

    (1998)
  • M.T. Stein et al.

    Parental refusal to immunize a 2-month-old infant

    J Dev Behav Pediatr

    (2000)
  • L.F. Ross et al.

    Religious exemptions to the immunization statutes: balancing public health and religious freedom

    J Law Med Ethics

    (1997)
  • C. Schaetti et al.

    Costs of illness due to cholera, costs of immunization and cost-effectiveness of an oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in Zanzibar

    PLoS Negl Trop Dis

    (2012)
  • G.S. Higgins Jpt

    Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0

    (2011)
  • H.I. Hyacinth et al.

    Cervical cancer and pap smear awareness and utilization of pap smear test among Federal civil servants in North Central Nigeria

    PLoS ONE

    (2012)
  • SAGE

    Guidance for the development of evidence-based vaccine-related recommendations; Version 2

    (2012)
  • A. d’Onofrio et al.

    The interplay of public intervention and private choices in determining the outcome of vaccination programmes

    PLoS ONE

    (2012)
  • P. Duclos et al.

    Establishing global policy recommendations: the role of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on immunization

    Expert Rev Vaccines

    (2011)
  • S.B. Omer et al.

    Nonmedical exemptions to school immunization requirements: secular trends and association of state policies with pertussis incidence

    J Am Med Assoc

    (2006)
  • S.B. Omer et al.

    Vaccination policies and rates of exemption from immunization, 2005–2011

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • J.S. Rota et al.

    Processes for obtaining nonmedical exemptions to state immunization laws

    Am J Public Health

    (2001)
  • D.A. Salmon et al.

    Exemptions to school immunization requirements: the role of school-level requirements, policies, and procedures

    Am J Public Health

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text