Trends in Ecology & Evolution
What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?
Section snippets
Citation rates and journal impact factors
The papers used in our analysis were published in 53 ecological journals with different impact factors (Box 1) and so we examined the relationship between the citation rates of individual papers and the impact factor of the journals in which they were published. The journal impact factor describes the mean citation rate of articles published in a given journal [25] and is calculated by dividing the number of citations received in the current year (e.g. 2003) for articles published in the
Citation rates and individual study characteristics
We examined the association between citation rates and two types of study characteristic: study outcome and article length. Several studies in medicine and psychology have found that the outcome of studies with respect to the hypothesis being tested influence citation rates, with either supportive or unsupportive results receiving more citations depending on the research area 14, 15, 16, 26, 30, 31. We found that the direction of study outcome with respect to the hypothesis tested might also
Citation rates and authorship characteristics
A recent survey [36] revealed that, of the authors publishing in five leading ecological journals, only 6% were females, which suggests a gender bias among senior ecologists. The range of ecological journals examined in our survey was much broader (53 versus 5) and, as a result, the proportion of articles written by females was much higher (30%). We found that gender of the first author had no effect on the citation rates of individual ecological papers (Box 3). This is in agreement with the
Conclusions
Our report is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to examine systematically the importance of various factors associated with the citation rates of ecological studies. The correlative nature of our study and the complex nature of the explanatory characteristics used make it difficult to interpret unambiguously the ultimate causes behind the observed associations. Nevertheless, the patterns that we detected suggest that factors other than the scientific utility of a study affect citation rates
Acknowledgements
We thank Erkki Haukioja, Chris Lortie and three anonymous referees for constructive comments on the earlier versions of the article, and Ellen Valle for checking the English. The study was supported financially by the Academy of Finland.
References (48)
- et al.
Citation bias in hepato-biliary randomized clinical trials
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
(2002) Gender bias in the refereeing process?
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2002)Quotation bias in reviews of the diet-heart idea
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
(1995)Science and technology in a democratic order
J. Leg. Polit. Soc.
(1942)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?
Scientometrics
(1979)- et al.
Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making
Sci. Pub. Pol.
(1992) The counting house
Nature
(2002)A Critique for Ecology
(1991)The scientific wealth of nations
Science
(1997)The scientific impact of nations
Nature
(2004)
Citation analysis and the science policy arena
Trends Biochem. Sci.
Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations
J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
Author judgements about works they cite: three studies from psychology journals
Soc. Stud. Sci.
Referencing as persuasion
Soc. Stud. Sci.
Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research
Acta Orthop. Scand.
How can we investigate citation behaviour? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication
J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.
Reference bias in reports of drug trials
Br. Med. J.
Cholesterol lowering trials in coronary heart disease: frequency of citation and outcome
Br. Med. J.
Journal citation impact factors and parochial citation practices
Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am.
Region-based citation bias in science
Nature
Why cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology
J. Doc.
Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic model
Am. Sociol. Rev.
Papers vanish in miss-citation black hole
Nature
Unfamiliar citations breed mistakes
Nature
Cited by (302)
The impact of policy collaboration networks and policy topic networks on policy diffusion: Empirical evidence from the energy field
2023, Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeBiases in parasite biodiversity research: why some helminth species attract more research than others
2023, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and WildlifeHow to accomplish a highly cited paper in the tourism, leisure and hospitality field
2023, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :In this regard, this study aims to determine whether these factors also affect the citation rate of documents indexed in the tourism, leisure and hospitality field. The extensive literature review tends to group these factors into one or several categories (see, for example, Leimu & Koricheva, 2005; Wesel, Wyatt & Haaf, 2014; Amara, Landry & Halilem, 2015; Antoniou, Antoniou, Georgakarakos, Sfyroeras & Georgiadis, 2015; Tahamtan, Safipour Afshar & Ahamdzadeh, 2016; Tahamtan & Bornmann, 2018; Xie, Gong, Li, Ke, Kang & Cheng, 2019). Based on these studies, and in accordance with the premise that there are several bibliometric indicators that can affect a document’s citation rate (Yu, Yu, Li & Wang, 2014; Stremersch, Camacho, Vanneste & Verniers, 2015), we will also group these factors into several categories.
Factors associating with or predicting more cited or higher quality journal articles: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper
2024, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology