Elsevier

Surgery

Volume 141, Issue 4, April 2007, Pages 442-449
Surgery

Original communication
Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: A randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.012Get rights and content

Background

We carried out a prospective, randomized, 4-arm study including control arm, blinding of examiners to determine effectiveness of computer-based video instruction (CBVI) and different types of expert feedback (concurrent and summary) on learning of a basic technical skill.

Methods

Using bench models, participants were pre-tested on a suturing and instrument knot-tying skill after viewing an instructional video. The students were subsequently assigned randomly to 4 practice conditions: no additional intervention (control), self study with CBVI, expert feedback during practice trials (concurrent feedback), and expert feedback after practice trials (summary feedback). All participants underwent 19 trials of practice, over 1 hour, in their assigned training condition. The effectiveness of training was assessed both at an immediate post-test and 1 month later at a retention test. Performance was evaluated using both expert-based (Global Rating Scores) and computer-based assessment (Hand Motion Analysis). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results

There were no differences in GRS between groups at pre-test. The CBVI, concurrent feedback and summary feedback methods were equally effective initially for the instruction of this basic technical skill to naive medical students and displayed better performance than control (control, 12.71 [10.79 to 14.62]; CBVI, 16.39 [14.38 to 18.40]; concurrent, 16.97 [15.79 to 18.15]; summary, 16.09 [13.57 to 18.62]; P < .001 each). At retention. however, only CBVI and summary feedback groups retained superior suturing and knot-tying performance versus control (control, 8.13 [6.94 to 9.85]; CBVI, 11.92 [10.19 to 14.99] P = .037; concurrent, 9.80 [8.55 to 13.45] P = .635; summary, 111.19 [10.27 to 14.29] P = .037). Hand motion data displayed a similar pattern of results. There were no group differences in the rate of learning (P > .05).

Conclusion

Our study showed that CBVI can be as effective as summary expert feedback in the instruction of basic technical skills to medical students. Thoughtfully incorporated into technical curricula, CBVI can make efficient use of faculty time and serve as a useful pedagogic adjunct for basic skills training. Additionally, our study provides evidence supporting an increased role of summary feedback to effectively train novices in technical skills.

Section snippets

Participants

Sixty Year 1 medical students at a single academic centre were recruited to participate in this study. Approval was obtained from the Health Sciences II University of Toronto Research Ethics Board and all students signed an informed consent.

Study design

The design was a prospective, randomized, 4-arm study including a control arm with blinding of the examiners. Participants were pre-tested on a suturing and instrument knot-tying skill (simple interrupted knots with 3 square throws) after viewing an

Expert assessment

Inter-rater reliability of the GRS, as evaluated by intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.904, indicating that evaluators were able to reliably distinguish between inferior and superior performances. There were no significant differences between groups at pre-test F(3,57) = .81, P = .494.

A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluating the effects of time (pre vs post vs retention) and group (control, CBVI, concurrent feedback, and summary feedback) showed a powerful main effect

Discussion

New technologies may have important educational advantages, but without proper validation, and support training for staff and students, they could prove to be an ineffective investment. Consequently, computer-based training should not be haphazardly introduced into curricula without proper empirical assessment of its optimal use. Similarly, commenting on the utility of virtual reality simulation, Gallagher et al14 stated that only thoughtful incorporation into a well-planned curriculum can take

Conclusion

This study questioned the statement that all practice is equal, and provided evidence supporting computer-assisted learning, and an increased role of summary feedback to effectively train novices in technical skills. It showed that CBVI can be as effective as summary expert feedback in the instruction of basic technical skills to medical students. Thoughtfully incorporated into training curricula, CBVI can make efficient use of faculty time and serve as a useful pedagogic adjunct for basic

References (31)

  • M.M. Carr et al.

    Internet-based otolaryngology case discussions for medical students

    J Otolaryngol

    (2002)
  • T. Greenhalgh

    Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education

    BMJ

    (2001)
  • R.A. Schmidt et al.

    New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training

    Psychol Sci

    (1992)
  • R.A. Magill et al.

    A visual model and knowledge of performance as sources of information for learning a rhythmic gymnastic skill

    Int J Sport Psychol

    (1996)
  • R.A. Magill

    Motor learning: concepts and applications

    (2001)
  • Cited by (231)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by Bell University Labs Health Communications Laboratory. The authors declare independence from funder.

    Approval for this study was obtained from the IRB (Health Sciences II University of Toronto REB-protocol reference 12410) and all students signed an informed consent.

    View full text