Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 68, Issue 4, February 2009, Pages 593-600
Social Science & Medicine

Weighing the importance of neighbourhood: A multilevel exploration of the determinants of overweight and obesity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Overweight and obesity have reached epidemic proportions in many countries, including Canada. In addition to becoming critical public health challenges in and of themselves, they represent major risk factors for chronic disease and disability (e.g. cardiovascular disease, diabetes). The various symptoms and co-morbidities associated with these chronic conditions place tremendous stress on the Canadian health care system, generating economic concern. This research takes a population health approach to the study of obesity, examining the complex relationships between individual demographics and behaviours, and aspects of the local social and physical environments. A subset of a nationally representative survey was linked to neighbourhood-level data from the 1991 Canadian Census, and analysed from a multilevel perspective. This study found substantial area-level variation in body mass index and waist circumference, and discovered an important role for neighbourhood-level characteristics independent of individual-level characteristics. These findings provide evidence that the underlying mechanisms driving the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity may be so called obesogenic environments that encourage physical inactivity and unhealthy eating. An effective policy response must address environmental conditions in order to curb current obesity trends.

Introduction

On a global scale, the increasing prevalence of obesity has reached epidemic proportions, and is a major contributing factor to dramatic increases in the rates of various chronic diseases and disabilities. Worldwide, approximately 1 billion adults are overweight (body mass index [BMI]  25 kg/m2) and at least 300 million of these individuals can be classified as obese (BMI  30 kg/m2) as defined by the World Health Organization standards (WHO, 2006). Likewise, in Canada obesity has emerged as a critical public health issue over the last several decades. The 2004 Canadian Community Health Survey found that approximately 36% of Canadian adults were overweight, and almost 23% could be classified as obese (Canadian Institute for Health Information [CIHI], 2004).

Overweight and obesity have been linked to numerous adverse health outcomes such as type II diabetes mellitus (WHO, 2006), various cancers (World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research, 2007), and adverse psychosocial outcomes such as depression (Kim, Meade, & Haines, 2006). Additionally, it is now clear that overweight and obesity are important risk factors for cardiovascular disease, currently the leading cause of mortality in Canada and much of the western industrialized world (Health Canada, 2006). In 2001, national medical costs attributable to adult overweight and obesity were estimated at $4.3 billion (CAD), or 2.2% of total health care expenditure (Katzmarzyk & Janssen, 2004).

At the physiological level, overweight and obesity are caused by an energy imbalance whereby caloric intake (diet) exceeds expenditure (physical activity) (Black & Macinko, 2008). Despite this relatively simple equation, obesity is a complex, multifactorial disease (Huot, Paradis, & Ledoux, 2004). Evidence has consistently shown variation in obesity rates between individuals to be associated with genetic, psychological, socioeconomic, and behavioural factors, all of which are thought to play a substantial role in onset (Poortinga, 2006). Until recently, obesity research has focused on exploring and identifying these potentially modifiable individual risk factors. While these strategies have had some success in developing intervention approaches for obesity, they have failed to effectively slow or reverse current obesity trends at the population-level, which indicate increasing prevalence across individuals of all ages, genders, socioeconomic groups, educational levels, and geographic regions (McLaren, 2007).

Within more recent obesity research, there is a growing consensus that individual characteristics and behaviours, and in particular dietary and physical activity patterns, are influenced by aspects of the broader socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental contexts in which people live (Moon et al., 2007, Ross et al., 2007). Following arguments developed by Rose (1985), population-level interventions have the power to shift the obesity distribution curve in a direction that would benefit the entire population by removing or modifying these underlying forces. Indeed, major gains in altering other health behaviours, such as reducing smoking-related inequalities in health, have been realized by developing interventions focused on modifying population-level determinants in combination with individual-level interventions (Thomas, Fayter, & Misso, et al., 2008).

A more ecologically informed approach to the obesity problem has the potential to identify, and help us understand the so called obesogenic environments which foster high energy diets and sedentary lifestyles, and develop an appropriate ‘upstream’ preventive response (Black & Macinko, 2008). It is these environmental factors that are explored in this paper. Overweight and obesity are framed as being functions of individual characteristics (e.g. age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, physical activity behaviours, dietary patterns), operating within a local neighbourhood context characterized by various socioeconomic, cultural, and physical characteristics.

Section snippets

Neighbourhood context and obesity

A number of environmental factors have been identified in the literature as potential determinants of overweight and obesity at the neighbourhood-level (Black & Macinko, 2008). In terms of the physical environment, access to opportunities for healthy eating and physical activity has been the main focus, including access to walking paths, trails, quality sidewalks, and recreation facilities (Boehmer et al., 2007, Giles-Corti and Donovan, 2002). These and other characteristics, such as street

Methods

This study is part of a larger program of research linked to the Canadian Heart Health Surveys Follow-up Study (CHHSFUS). This program of research entails a comprehensive analysis of the most recent representative risk factor surveys of a national sample of over 35,000 individuals. As part of the data collection process, the CHHS include detailed demographic, behavioural and socioeconomic information, as well as anthropometric indicators of cardiovascular disease as measured and recorded by a

Individual-level correlates

The final multilevel models are presented as β estimates in Table 4, Table 5. These coefficients may be interpreted as the absolute change in the outcome variable associated with a one unit increase in the independent variable for continuous variables (e.g. age). For categorical variables, these coefficients can be interpreted as the difference between mean BMI or WC between levels of that categorical variable (e.g. not having completed a high school education) and the reference group (e.g.

Discussion and conclusions

The goal of this study was to measure and attempt to understand the contribution of the local neighbourhood environment to differences in overweight and obesity in Ontario. We were able to show that overall variation in BMI and WC is influenced by both between neighbourhood and within-neighbourhood variation. At the time of this study, the CHHS data was the most recent to have included measured BMI and WC, a great strength of this research. The majority of the variation in these outcomes was

Acknowledgements

We greatfully acknowledge the support of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canadian Heart Health Follow-up Study team for funding this research. We also wish to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments.

References (53)

  • D. Berrigan et al.

    The association between urban form and physical activity in U.S. adults

    American Journal of Preventive Medicine

    (2002)
  • J.L. Black et al.

    Neighbourhoods and obesity

    Nutrition Reviews

    (2008)
  • T.K. Boehmer et al.

    Perceived and observed neighbourhood indicators of obesity among urban adults

    International Journal of Obesity

    (2007)
  • S.E. Boslaugh et al.

    Perceptions of the neighbourhood environment for physical activity: is it “who you are” or “where you live”?

    Journal of Urban Health

    (2004)
  • B. Brown et al.

    Place attachment in a revitalizing neighbourhood: individual and block levels of analysis

    Journal of Environmental Psychology

    (2003)
  • Canadian Heart Health Database Centre

    Risk factor surveys

  • Canadian Heart Health Surveys Follow-Up Study
  • Canadian Institute for Health Information

    Summary Report: How healthy are rural Canadians? An assessment of their health status and health determinants(atl)

    Health indicators – June 2004

    (2006)
  • Centre for Multilevel Modeling

    Centre for multilevel modeling

  • B. Chaix et al.

    Tobacco and alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle and overweightness in France: a multilevel analysis of individual and area-level determinants

    European Journal of Epidemiology

    (2003)
  • D.A. Cohen et al.

    Collective efficacy and obesity: the potential influence of social factors on health

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2006)
  • Comprehensive R Archive Network
  • Y.C. Cozier et al.

    Relation between neighbourhood median housing value and hypertension risk among black women in the United States

    Research and Practice

    (2007)
  • A. Diez-Roux et al.

    A multilevel analysis of income inequality and cardiovascular disease risk factors

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2000)
  • C.J. Dobbelsteyn et al.

    A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors

    International Journal of Obesity

    (2001)
  • A. Drewnowski et al.

    Disparities in obesity rates: analysis by ZIP code area

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2007)
  • J.R. Dunn

    Housing and inequalities in health: a study of socioeconomic dimensions of housing and self reported health from a survey of Vancouver residents

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (2002)
  • A. Ellaway et al.

    Does area of residence affect body size and shape?

    International Journal of Obesity

    (1997)
  • A. Ellaway et al.

    Graffiti, greenergy and obesity in adults: secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey

    BMJ

    (2005)
  • T.A. Farley et al.

    Safe play spaces to promote physical activity in inner-city children: results from a pilot study of environmental intervention

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2007)
  • L.D. Frank et al.

    Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighbourhood travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity?

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2007)
  • B. Giles-Corti et al.

    The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2002)
  • Health Canada

    Healthy living

  • J.J. Hox

    Applied multilevel analysis

    (1995)
  • I. Huot et al.

    Factors associated with overweight and obesity in Quebec adults

    International Journal of Obesity

    (2004)
  • I. Janssen et al.

    Influence of individual- and area-level measures of socioeconomic status on obesity, unhealthy eating, and physical inactivity in Canadian adolescents

    American Journal of Clinical Nursing

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text