Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 93, August 2015, Pages 1-7
Resuscitation

Simulation and education
Frequent brief on-site simulation training and reduction in 24-h neonatal mortality—An educational intervention study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim of the study

“Helping Babies Breathe” (HBB) is a simulation-based educational program developed to help reduce perinatal mortality worldwide. A one-day HBB training course did not improve clinical management of neonates. The objective was to assess the impact of frequent brief (3–5 min weekly) on-site HBB simulation training on newborn resuscitation practices in the delivery room and the potential impact on 24-h neonatal mortality.

Methods

Before/after educational intervention study in a rural referral hospital in Northern Tanzania. Baseline data was collected from 01.02.2010 to 31.01.2011 and post-intervention data from 01.02.2011 to 31.01.2012. All deliveries were observed by research assistants who recorded information about labor, newborn delivery room management, perinatal characteristics, and neonatal outcomes. A newborn simulator was placed in the labor ward and frequent brief HBB simulation training was implemented on-site; 3-min of weekly paired practice, assisted by local-trainers. Local-trainers also facilitated 40-min monthly re-trainings. Outcome measures were; delivery room management of newborns and 24-h neonatal outcomes (normal, admitted to a neonatal area, death, or stillbirths).

Results

There were 4894 deliveries pre and 4814 post-implementation of frequent brief simulation training. The number of stimulated neonates increased from 712(14.5%) to 785(16.3%) (p = 0.016), those suctioned increased from 634(13.0%) to 762(15.8%) (p  0.0005). Neonates receiving bag mask ventilation decreased from 357(7.3%) to 283(5.9%) (p = 0.005). Mortality at 24-h decreased from 11.1/1000 to 7.2/1000 (p = 0.040).

Conclusion

On-site, brief and frequent HBB simulation training appears to facilitate transfer of new knowledge and skills into clinical practice and to be accompanied by a decrease in neonatal mortality.

Introduction

Globally, around 2.9 million newborn infants die each year with as much as 36–70 per cent of these deaths occurring within the first day of life [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Moreover, neonatal mortality accounts for a steadily increasing proportion of under-five child mortality [1], [3], [5], [6]. Therefore, to meet Millennium Developmental Goal 4 of reducing under-five child mortality by two thirds by 2015, a major focus on optimizing basic newborn care is needed [4], [7].

Simulation-based education is increasingly used worldwide as a method of learning- and performance-assessment. Several studies have demonstrated sustained improvement in management of simulated medical emergencies after simulation training [8], [9], [10], [11], but very few studies have evaluated whether the acquired skills are translated into clinical practice with improvement in patient outcomes [12], [13]. Due to the gaps in knowledge between performance in classroom assessment as compared to clinical practice, evaluation of educational programs during local implementation, designed to facilitate skills translation to clinical practice may in part narrow these gaps.

The simulation-based “Helping Babies Breathe” (HBB) program was developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics with global partners to train providers in basic neonatal care and resuscitation aimed at reducing perinatal mortality worldwide [14]. Currently, HBB is being implemented in more than 60 low-resourced countries [14]. Tanzania was the first country to initiate a National implementation of HBB in 2009, and Haydom Lutheran Hospital (HLH), a rural referral hospital, was one of eight HBB study sites selected to evaluate the effects and impact of local implementation strategies on reducing neonatal mortality (Fig. 1) [15]. At HLH, an observational study started in the delivery rooms in July 2009. Simultaneously, care providers were assessed simulating newborn resuscitation pre and post a one-day HBB course (Fig. 1), and the pass-rate increased from 18 to 74% (p  0.0001) [16]. However, basic neonatal resuscitation management, i.e. suctioning, stimulation and application of bag mask ventilation (BMV), coupled with neonatal outcomes as observed in the delivery rooms during the corresponding time-period did not change [16]. No re-trainings were performed in this period.

As a consequence of these observations, frequent and brief on-site (FBOS) HBB simulation-training was initiated, as an effort to enhance clinical translation of simulation training into routine practice. The aim of the study was to assess if FBOS HBB simulation-training would impact clinical practice and reduce 24-h neonatal mortality.

Section snippets

Setting

HLH serves a catchment of about 2 million people. The hospital provides comprehensive emergency obstetric, and basic emergency newborn care 24 h a day in accordance with WHO guidelines [17]. During the study period, deliveries and newborn resuscitations were predominantly conducted by midwives working in three shifts. During evening- and nightshifts one doctor was on call for the entire hospital. Anesthetic, operating, and student nurses, and ward attendants with no formal medical education were

Overall population

Table 1 presents neonatal characteristics, provider management, and outcome of all infants born pre-implementation (Cohort 1) compared to post-implementation of FBOS training (Cohort 2). The numbers of deliveries during the two periods were almost similar i.e., 4894 versus 4814, respectively. Birth weight (BW) and gestational age (GA) were significantly lower in Cohort 2. The incidence of labor complications was similar, however fetal heart rate abnormalities and cesarean sections (CS)

Discussion

This observational study describes for the first time a change in clinical management of newborn infants accompanied by a substantial reduction (40%) in neonatal mortality during a one-year study period following implementation of FBOS HBB simulation training. More infants were immediately stimulated and suctioned with fewer receiving BMV, resulting in a significant reduction in deaths. The “resuscitation kit” was more frequently prepared before delivery, and midwives took more often

Conclusion

Implementation of FBOS HBB simulation training may be associated with improved clinical behavior and performance and with a corresponding reduction in 24-h neonatal mortality. These observations suggest the importance of frequent and brief training in facilitating the transfer of new knowledge and skills into clinical practice.

Integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis

Mduma E and Ersdal HL who are principal investigators in this study had full access to all the data in this study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have indicated that they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. Dr Ersdal has received research grants and Haydom Lutheran Hospital project funds from the Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine. However, study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report and/or the decision to submit the article for publication was independent from the financial source.

Acknowledgements

We thank the mothers giving birth at HLH, the HLH Maternity ward staff (especially Sarah Lyanga), the Hospital Management team, and the Research team (especially Anita Yeconia Bukhay and Ladislaus Blacy Yarrot). The Tanzania Ministry of Health and Social Welfare was essential in the roll-out of HBB. We thank The Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, Norway for funding this project.

The study sponsor, is not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in

References (23)

  • P.M. Kuduvalli et al.

    Unanticipated difficult airway management in anaesthetised patients: a prospective study of the effect of mannequin training on management strategies and skill retention

    Anaesthesia

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.019.

    View full text