Review article
Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: A summary of preclinical, clinical and translational findings

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.05.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric illness, with 6–12% lifetime prevalence. It is also among the five most disabling diseases worldwide. Current pharmacological treatments, although relatively effective, present important side effects that lead to treatment discontinuation. Therefore, novel treatment options for MDD are needed. Here, we discuss the recent advancements of one new neuromodulatory technique – transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) – that has undergone intensive research over the past decade with promising results. tDCS is based on the application of weak, direct electric current over the scalp, leading to cortical hypo- or hyper-polarization according to the specified parameters. Recent studies have shown that tDCS is able to induce potent changes in cortical excitability as well as to elicit long-lasting changes in brain activity. Moreover, tDCS is a technique with a low rate of reported side effects, relatively easy to apply and less expensive than other neuromodulatory techniques — appealing characteristics for clinical use. In the past years, 4 of 6 phase II clinical trials and one recent meta-analysis have shown positive results in ameliorating depression symptoms. tDCS has some interesting, unique aspects such as noninvasiveness and low rate of adverse effects, being a putative substitutive/augmentative agent for antidepressant drugs, and low-cost and portability, making it suitable for use in clinical practice. Still, further phase II and phase III trials are needed as to better clarify tDCS role in the therapeutic arsenal of MDD.

Highlights

► tDCS is a novel brain stimulation tool increasingly used in neuropsychiatry. ► tDCS is based on polarity-effects of DCs in changing cortical excitability. ► Advantages of tDCS are: portability, easiness of use and low rate of side effects. ► tDCS clinical trials in depression have shown promising results. ► We update the main findings and challenges of tDCS as a treatment for depression.

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe, chronic and prevalent psychiatric illness, with community-based surveys showing a lifetime prevalence ranging from 6 to 12%, and an annual prevalence of 3–11% worldwide (Andrade et al., 2003, Kessler et al., 2005, Waraich et al., 2004). It is expected to be the second most disabling condition by 2020 (Murray and Lopez, 1997). In addition, nearly 80% of patients relapse after one antidepressant treatment (Anderson et al., 2008) and almost 33% of patients fail to achieve remission after two or more antidepressant trials — a condition named treatment-resistant depression (Berlim and Turecki, 2007). Moreover, antidepressant side effects such as weight gain; sexual dysfunction and somnolence can significantly decrease patient compliance of maintenance treatment in MDD (Brunoni et al., 2009, Zajecka, 2000). Therefore, the development of new therapeutic interventions for the treatment of this psychiatric illness is needed.

In fact, one field under intensive investigation is neuromodulation. From electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to novel clinical and preclinical techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), these techniques aim to develop novel non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuromodulation can be either invasive, for instance, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), a technique that implants electrodes in subcortical areas aiming the treatment of conditions such as Parkinson's disease and, more recently, MDD (George and Aston-Jones, 2010); or non-invasive, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (Fig. 1).

RTMS uses a coil positioned over the scalp as to generate a potent, pulsatile electromagnetic field (up to 3 T), secondarily inducing an electric current flow inside the brain. Conversely, tDCS is based on the application of weak (0.5–2 mA), direct electric current into the brain through relatively large electrodes placed over the scalp (George and Aston-Jones, 2010). For MDD, rTMS has been more investigated than tDCS hitherto, with dozens of phase-II trials and at least two phase-III trials showing its efficacy — in fact, rTMS has been ultimately approved for the treatment of MDD by regulatory agencies and is being increasingly used worldwide (Brunoni et al., 2010). Nevertheless, this technique has some drawbacks, such as (1) cost: application of rTMS usually costs US$ 300.00 per session, which is expensive in most settings (Simpson et al., 2009); (2) clinical applicability: rTMS is a non-portable device that can be used only in hospital and/or ambulatory settings, obligating patients to perform daily visits to the clinic; (3) availability: rTMS is a relatively expensive device applied only by trained physicians. These issues greatly limit rTMS availability (Priori et al., 2009). One possible solution is developing handheld rTMS devices, which are in fact currently under investigation (George and Aston-Jones, 2010). Another solution would be a device that combines the non-pharmacological advantages of rTMS with low-cost, easiness of use and portability; in fact, these characteristics are present in tDCS devices. Currently, tDCS research on MDD has experimented significant advancement, with some clinical trial showing promising results (Boggio et al., 2008a, Brunoni et al., 2011b, Ferrucci et al., 2009b, Fregni et al., 2006a). The aim of this review is, therefore, to summarize the main aspects and challenges of tDCS as a novel treatment for major depression.

Section snippets

Historical remarks

Reports of brain stimulation through electric currents have existed since the Ancient time; with observations by Greek and Roman physicians that the electric “torpedo fish” delivered electric discharges that could relieve headache (Largus, 1529). After the introduction of the electric battery in the 18th century, some physicians started to use these galvanic batteries to perform electric brain stimulation in selected subjects (Zago et al., 2008), although these interventions were uncontrolled

Technical aspects and mechanisms of action

tDCS devices are essentially composed by four main components: electrodes (usually one anode and one cathode), power supply (usually 9 V batteries), an amperemeter (for measurement of the intensity of the electric current) and a potentiometer (to allow adjustment of the electric current). One electrode is necessarily placed over the scalp, above the cortical area aimed to be stimulated. The other electrode can be also positioned over the scalp, or, alternatively, on an extra-cephalic position

Putative mechanisms of action

Among several biological hypotheses for explaining MDD, one specially appealing to the field of neuromodulation is the neural system hypothesis, which understands depression as a condition related to dysfunction in several cortical and subcortical areas, specially (as shown by neuroimaging and EEG studies) the dorsolateral and ventromedial areas of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the amygdala and the hippocampus (Campbell et al., 2004, Hamilton et al., 2008), which are associated with symptoms

Clinical studies

From 2006 onwards, at least 19 clinical studies with different methodologies (such as case reports; open-label trials; randomized, controlled trials; and meta-analysis) have been published exploring tDCS effects on depression (Table 1). We further discuss their main findings and limitations.

Future directions

Although the abovementioned results are promising, there are important issues related to tDCS clinical research. We discuss three of them.

Conclusion

tDCS has a wide range of potential applications, including treatment of major depressive disorder, as preclinical and clinical studies showed that it elicits potent neuromodulatory effects. tDCS has some interesting, unique aspects such as noninvasiveness and low rate of side effects, being a putative substitutive/augmentative agent for antidepressant drugs, and low-cost and portability, making it suitable for use in clinical practice.

References (78)

  • D. Liebetanz et al.

    Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2009)
  • D.M. Martin et al.

    Fronto-extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for major depression: an open-label pilot study

    J Affect Disord

    (2011)
  • P.C. Miranda et al.

    Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2006)
  • C.J. Murray et al.

    Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: global burden of disease study

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • C. Nissen et al.

    Learning as a model for neural plasticity in major depression

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • M.A. Nitsche et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008

    Brain Stimul

    (2008)
  • M.A. Nitsche et al.

    Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a review

    Exp Neurol

    (2009)
  • M.A. Nitsche et al.

    Serotonin affects transcranial direct current-induced neuroplasticity in humans

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • C. Normann et al.

    Long-term plasticity of visually evoked potentials in humans is altered in major depression

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • U. Palm et al.

    Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Brain Stimul

    (2008)
  • A. Priori et al.

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?

    Brain Stimul

    (2009)
  • S.P. Rigonatti et al.

    Transcranial direct stimulation and fluoxetine for the treatment of depression

    Eur Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • Y. Takano et al.

    A rat model for measuring the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation using fMRI

    Neurosci Lett

    (2011)
  • D. Wachter et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation induces polarity-specific changes of cortical blood perfusion in the rat

    Exp Neurol

    (2011)
  • I.M. Anderson et al.

    Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines

    J Psychopharmacol

    (2008)
  • L. Andrade et al.

    The epidemiology of major depressive episodes: results from the International Consortium of Psychiatric Epidemiology (ICPE) Surveys

    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res

    (2003)
  • A.P. Arul-Anandam et al.

    Induction of hypomanic episode with transcranial direct current stimulation

    J ECT

    (2010)
  • A. Baccaro et al.

    Hypomanic episode in unipolar depression during transcranial direct current stimulation

    Acta Neuropsychiatr

    (2010)
  • G. Beeli et al.

    Modulating presence and impulsiveness by external stimulation of the brain

    Behav Brain Funct

    (2008)
  • M.T. Berlim et al.

    Definition, assessment, and staging of treatment-resistant refractory major depression: a review of current concepts and methods

    Can J Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • L.J. Bindman et al.

    The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) During current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects

    J Physiol

    (1964)
  • P.S. Boggio et al.

    A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression

    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol

    (2008)
  • A.R. Brunoni et al.

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies on major depression and BDNF levels: implications for the role of neuroplasticity in depression

    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol

    (2008)
  • A.R. Brunoni et al.

    Pharmacological and combined interventions for the acute depressive episode: focus on efficacy and tolerability

    Ther Clin Risk Manag

    (2009)
  • A.R. Brunoni et al.

    Neuromodulation approaches for the treatment of major depression: challenges and recommendations from a working group meeting

    Arq Neuropsiquiatr

    (2010)
  • A.R. Brunoni et al.

    A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation

    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol

    (2011)
  • A.R. Brunoni et al.

    Translational research in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a systematic review of studies in animals

    Rev Neurosci

    (2011)
  • A.R. Brunoni et al.

    Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions

    Brain Stimul

    (2011)
  • A.R. Brunoni et al.

    Manic psychosis after sertraline and transcranial direct-current stimulation

    J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci

    (2011)
  • Cited by (113)

    • The effect of expertise, training and neurostimulation on sensory-motor skill in esports

      2021, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      When providing anodal stimulation, the excitability of the underlying cortical neurons is increased. Alternatively, cathodal stimulation has shown to decrease the excitability of the underlying cortical neurons (Brunoni et al., 2012). The neuromodulatory effects from a brief application of tDCS (10–20min) can persist for over 1 h, and repeated stimulation can prolong and stabilise changes that last for weeks (Nitsche & Paulus, 2011).

    • Effect of prefrontal tDCS on resting brain fMRI graph measures in Alcohol Use Disorders: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.

      2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      An earlier study has shown that a single bilateral tDCS session, either left cathodal/right anodal or left anodal/right cathodal, over the DLPFC to reduce alcohol craving in AUD patients (Boggio et al., 2008). Application of left anodal & right cathodal tDCS has been shown to have an antidepressant effect (Brunoni et al., 2012a, 2012b; Mayur et al., 2018). Such an antidepressant effect has the potential to facilitate relapse prevention as well as reduce impulsivity measures in AUD.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text