Remote Management of Voice and Swallowing Disorders

Growing reliance on telemedicine has created new triaging challenges. This study investigated how effectively otolaryngology resident auditory-perceptual voice assessments performed via telemedicine determined the need for urgent in-person clinic visits.

Twelve otolaryngology resident physicians (PGY1–PGY5) performed auditory-perceptual assessments on 25 voice samples recorded during initial voice evaluations. Voice samples were balanced in severity and taken in equal numbers from patients with the following diagnoses: benign laryngeal lesions, laryngeal cancer, functional voice disorders, laryngeal edema (associated with LPR), and laryngeal paralysis/paresis. Urgent diagnoses were defined as laryngeal cancer and severe unilateral laryngeal paralysis. For each voice sample, residents were initially blinded to patient medical history. Residents rated severity of voice disorder, predicted patient diagnosis, and determined the urgency of seeing the patient in clinic. Residents then reviewed information from the patient's medical history and again rated urgency of voice disorder.

On average, residents identified urgent voice disorders in 56% of cases. After reviewing medical history, this number significantly increased to 77% (P = 0.001). Voice severity, smoking history, time since onset, and course of symptoms were considered most influential when determining medical urgency of voice patients. Year in residency program had no effect on rating accuracy. As expected, diagnostic accuracy of auditory-perceptual assessments was low, ranging from 40% for laryngeal paralysis/paresis to 5% for laryngeal edema.

Auditory-perceptual voice assessment, combined with medical history, predicted most medically urgent voice disorders. Further work should investigate if task-specific training might improve these results and which medical history items are most critical. Until accuracy of auditory-perceptual assessment of medical urgency is improved, these data underscore the importance of laryngeal examination in identifying medical urgency and etiology of dysphonia.

This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the opinions and experiences with telepractice (TP) of Dutch-speaking speech-language pathologists (SLPs) living in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium (Flanders). This study will help to optimize care for children with speech-language disorders as we will gain more insight into the experienced barriers and facilitators while using TP for assessing and treating these disorders.

Twenty-nine Dutch-speaking speech-language pathologists living in Flanders (age category 20–30 years: n = 16/29, 55.2%, 31–40 years: n = 10/29, 34.2%, 41–50 years: n = 2/29, 6.9%, 51–60 years: n = 1/29, 3.4%) were recruited through the social media. An online questionnaire was developed based on the available literature and administered to the SLPs. To compare the opinions and experiences of SLPs with TP, χ2 tests or Fisher's exact tests were used.

The study showed a statistically significant association between years of clinical experience of SLPs and their opinion that TP does not provide more options in a clinical setting compared to face-to-face contact. SLPs who had expertise in multiple domains experienced significantly more added value of TP during the corona pandemic than SLPs who had expertise in only one specific domain. Additionally, SLPs who worked in a private practice indicated significantly more difficulties in developing a therapeutic relationship due to a lack of personal contact than SLPs who worked in other settings. 51.7% (15/29) of the SLPs experienced technical barriers using TP.

Expertise in multiple domains of pediatric speech-language therapy resulted in experiencing more added value of TP during the corona pandemic, possibly because of the experience of multiple different and simultaneous advantages of TP in several domains. Additionally, SLPs in a private practice experienced more difficulties in developing a therapeutic relationship due to a lack of personal contact with their clients. This is in contrast to hospitals where children are often seen for a shorter period. Hence, there may be less chance of a negative perception of relationships with clients. Another conclusion is that treatment drop-out was not larger using TP compared to face-to-face therapy. However, SLPs experienced that the use of TP was not promoted/encouraged by their employer possibly because of technical barriers. It is hoped that the findings of this study will help SLPs and policymakers overthrow existing barriers and make telepractice a substantial, effective, and efficient service delivery model.

An interdisciplinary model of care for the evaluation and treatment of voice, swallowing, and upper airway disorders with laryngologists and specialized speech-language pathologists is known to increase revenue, attendance to visits, patient adherence, and most importantly, improve patient outcomes. Individuals who live outside of areas with high population density often have reduced geographic access to this specialized care. The primary aim of this study is to identify the percentage of the population that has an “extended drive time” to access an interdisciplinary clinic in the Southeast region of the United States.

NA.

Interdisciplinary laryngology and speech-language pathology clinics were identified via publicly accessible information including an internet search and state department of public health databases. Included clinics had at least one full-time fellowship-trained laryngologist and at least one full-time speech-language pathologist on staff. Descriptive statistics and visual representation of the results were achieved with the use of Smappen, a location intelligence online platform, to identify the percent of the population with a drive time greater than 1 hour.

47.24% of the Southeast population of the United States must drive over 1 hour to access an interdisciplinary clinic. Visual representations of these data are included and generated by Smappen.

While close geographic proximity does not ensure access to care, it can increase the likelihood that healthcare services will be used. This study identified the population in the Southeast region of the United States with extended drive time to interdisciplinary voice and swallowing centers due to their geographic distance from these centers. The results from this study support the need for increased geographic access to specialty care clinics, specifically voice, swallowing, and upper airway care, and provide insight into potential sites for interdisciplinary centers based on population density in areas that are underserved.

To analyze the internal consistency of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) for evaluating the vocal handicap of individuals with dysphonia.

This is a systematic review. Studies with a cross-sectional design and including a population of individuals with dysphonia, which validated the VHI and analyzed its internal consistency, were included. The following electronic databases were searched: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, and PubMed, including Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. A manual search was performed in gray literature through the Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses. In addition, the list of references of studies selected in the electronic search was mapped, and an expert in the area was consulted. Two reviewers blindly and independently conducted the selection, data extraction, and analysis of the risk of bias, the certainty of the evidence, and good psychometric measures. A meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model using the JAMOVI 2.3.2 software.

Forty-nine studies were analyzed. In risk of bias assessment, the studies were classified as having inadequate structural validity and very good internal consistency. The analysis of good psychometric properties indicated indeterminate structural validity and insufficient internal consistency. The overall value of Cronbach's alpha was estimated at 0.94, thus suggesting a very good internal consistency. However, there was high heterogeneity. The level of certainty of the evidence was too low for internal consistency.

The VHI proved to be a consistent and reliable patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate voice handicap in individuals with dysphonia; however, studies are heterogeneous, and the certainty of evidence is very low.

Virtual therapy (teletherapy) for patients with dysphonia has become ubiquitous in the COVID-19 era. However, barriers to widespread implementation are evident, including unpredictable insurance coverage attributed to limited evidence supporting this approach. In our single-institution cohort, our objective was to show strong evidence for use and effectiveness of teletherapy for patients with dysphonia.

Single institution, retrospective cohort study.

This was an analysis of all patients referred for speech therapy with dysphonia as primary diagnosis from 4/1/2020 to 7/1/2021 and in whom all therapy sessions were delivered in a teletherapy format. We collated and analyzed demographics and clinical characteristics and adherence to the teletherapy program. We assessed changes in perceptual assessments and vocal capabilities (GRBAS, MPT), patient-reported outcomes (V-RQOL), and metrics of session outcomes (complexity of vocal tasks, carry-over of target voice) pre- and post-teletherapy using student's t test and chi-square test.

Our cohort included 234 patients (mean [SD] age 52 [20] years) residing a mean (SD) distance of 51.3 (67.1) miles from our institution. The most common referral diagnosis was muscle tension dysphonia (n = 145, 62.0% patients). Patients attended a mean (SD) of 4.2 (3.0) sessions; 68.0% (n = 159) of patients completed four or more sessions and/or were deemed appropriate for discharge from teletherapy program. Statistically significant improvements were seen in complexity and consistency of vocal tasks with consistent gains in carry-over of target voice for isolated tasks and connected speech.

Teletherapy is a versatile and effective approach for treatment of patients with dysphonia of varying age, geography, and diagnoses.

The COVID-19 pandemic expanded the use of telemedicine, but there is no literature exploring both patient and provider satisfaction specifically in the provision of voice therapy. This study aims to investigate patient and provider satisfaction with virtual voice therapy, its associated factors, and any correlation between the two.

Cross-sectional study. Participants included 226 adults who underwent voice therapy delivered via telepractice at the USC Voice Center between April and October 2020. Patients and providers self-reported their level of satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS; range 0-100). Patient satisfaction was additionally measured using a previously validated Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ; range 1-5), and a binary question about their desire to choose telemedicine over in-person therapy in the future. Three speech-language pathologists rated provider satisfaction for all 226 patients. Patient satisfaction survey was completed by 55 patients. Multivariable linear regression analyses and linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the results.

Patient and provider mean (SD) VAS satisfaction scores were 86.8 (18.6) and 80.6 (19.7), respectively. The mean (SD) TSQ score was 4.4 (0.6). In a multivariable model, patient satisfaction levels were significantly higher for hypofunctional than for hyperfunctional dysphonia diagnoses. Forty-four (73%) patients reported they would prefer telemedicine voice therapy over in-person appointments, which was significantly correlated with internet reliability (P = 0.04). For providers, satisfaction was significantly lower for patients whose diagnosis had changed after initiation of voice therapy (Δ = -16.0 [95% CI: -28.7 to -3.2]) and for encounters with Asian patients compared to White patients (Δ = -11.6 [95% CI: -18.9 to -4.2]). Patient and provider satisfaction scores were weakly correlated (r = 0.19).

Our findings suggest that virtual voice therapy is not simply an alternative to in-person service, but rather an effective method useful beyond the current pandemic with proper diagnosis and technical support.