Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 114, Issue 12, December 2007, Pages 2302-2308
Ophthalmology

Original article
Prevalence and Causes of Visual Impairment in Rural Myanmar: The Meiktila Eye Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.004Get rights and content

Objective

To determine the prevalence and causes of visual impairment in the Meiktila district of central, rural Myanmar.

Design

Population-based cross-sectional study.

Participants

Random, stratified, cluster sampling of the inhabitants 40 years of age and older from villages in the Meiktila district was performed; 2481 eligible participants were identified and 2076 participated in the study.

Methods

The ophthalmic examination included presenting and pinhole Snellen visual acuity with an illiterate E chart, slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment, and dilated stereoscopic fundus examination. The principal cause of visual impairment was recorded.

Main Outcome Measures

Visual impairment and blindness were defined by both presenting and corrected visual acuity according to World Health Organization criteria: better eye < 6/18 and < 3/60, respectively.

Results

Comprehensive examinations, including Snellen visual acuity, were performed on 2073 participants (83.6%) The prevalence estimate of presenting visual impairment was 40.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.1–44.7) and of presenting blindness was 8.1% (95% CI, 6.5–9.9). After pinhole correction, the corresponding prevalences were 26.8% (95% CI, 23.5–30.1) and 5.3% (95% CI, 4.0–6.6). Cataract, uncorrected refractive error, and glaucoma were the most common causes of visual impairment.

Conclusions

Visual impairment and blindness remain major public health problems in rural Myanmar. Specific programs directed toward reducing the cataract burden need to be implemented.

Section snippets

Sampling Procedure

The Meiktila Eye Study was a population-based, cross-sectional ophthalmic survey of the inhabitants of rural villages in central Myanmar. The principal aims of this project were to estimate the prevalence and causes of visual impairment and the prevalence and risk factors of ocular disorders among persons 40 years of age or older in this region.

The study was conducted within the Mandalay Division, an area encompassing 34 253 km2 divided into 7 second-order administrative districts of

Results

A total of 2481 persons were eligible and 2076 were examined (836 males, 1240 females). The overall participation rate was 83.7%, and the mean age was 56.2 years (standard deviation, 11.5 years); VA could not be measured in 3 participants because of deafness or cognitive impairment, or both. The prevalence estimate of presenting blindness in the population 40+ in the Meiktila district was 8.1% (95% CI, 6.5–9.9; design effect, 2.05; 161 participants). Only 3 participants had spectacles at

Discussion

Although there has been an enormous reduction in the infective causes of blindness, the global burden of blindness has not altered appreciably for over a decade,17, 18 a situation caused by a number of factors, including increasing life expectancy in developing countries, the consequent increase in cataract and glaucoma, and the misdistribution of ophthalmic health care. Although comparisons between studies must be made cautiously because of varying definitions and study design, it is clear

References (34)

  • S. Resnikoff et al.

    Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2004)
  • T.Y. Wong et al.

    The epidemiology of age related eye diseases in Asia

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2006)
  • J. Baasanhu et al.

    Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Mongolia: a survey of populations aged 40 years and older

    Bull World Health Organ

    (1994)
  • G.P. Pokharel et al.

    Prevalence of blindness and cataract surgery in Nepal

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (1998)
  • J.J. Michon et al.

    Prevalence of visual impairment, blindness, and cataract surgery in the Hong Kong elderly

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2002)
  • M. Zainal et al.

    Prevalence of blindness and low vision in Malaysian population: results from the National Eye Survey 1996

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2002)
  • S.M. Saw et al.

    Causes of low vision and blindness in rural Indonesia

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Effect of Community Screening on the Demographic Makeup and Clinical Severity of Glaucoma Patients Receiving Care in Urban China

      2018, American Journal of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The visual field defects of the Clinic group in the current study (mean MD −19.8 dB) were worse than those reported by Grødum and associates (−16.2 dB, P < .01, PSD not reported). This may be associated with significantly greater damage at the time of diagnosis than open-angle glaucoma28,29 or with lower rates of early detection of glaucoma in China as a developing country.11–13,30 Among our Screening group patients, 72.7% had early or moderate glaucomatous visual field defects, consistent with results of the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial, which also employed a population-based sample.31

    • Public Health Eye Care: Modeling Techniques to Translate Evidence Into Effective Action

      2017, Handbook of Statistics
      Citation Excerpt :

      As highlighted already, the commonest cause of blindness globally is cataract. In many countries of South Asia, the proportion of blindness due to cataract can be as high as 60%–80% which is higher than most of the other regions of the world (Casson et al., 2007; Dineen et al., 2003; Edussuriya et al., 2009; Jadoon et al., 2006; John et al., 2008a; Lepcha et al., 2013; Murthy et al., 2001, 2005; Nirmalan et al., 2002; Sapkota et al., 2006). Therefore, significant resource allocation in South Asia is on cataract surgical services.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 2006-740.

    Pfizer Ophthalmic, Sydney, Australia, and Alcon Australia, Sydney, Australia, lent equipment for this study, but the design of the survey and its execution, analysis, interpretation, and publication were carried out independently by the authors.

    The authors are aware of no conflicts of interest, of any nature, pertaining to the article.

    View full text