Oral medicine
Management recommendations for invasive dental treatment in patients using oral antithrombotic medication, including novel oral anticoagulants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.07.026Get rights and content

Objective

The aims were (1) to search the scientific literature from 2007 to 2012 for guidelines and new studies on the dental management of patients using oral antithrombotic medication; (2) to summarize the articles' evidence and recommendations; and (3) to propose an updated clinical practice guideline for general dentists.

Study Design

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Guideline websites, from October 2007 to October 2012, produced articles that were critically evaluated.

Results

The systematic literature search for guidelines yielded 74 citations (MEDLINE, 45; Embase, 22; and the Guideline websites, 7). Of these, only 2 guideline publications and 2 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. They yielded 32 recommendations.

Conclusions

The evidence and subsequent recommendations from published guidelines all point in the same direction: do not interrupt oral antithrombotic medication, not even dual antiplatelet therapy, in simple dental procedures.

Section snippets

Methods

We used the search strategies from our previous systematic search for guidelines on invasive dental treatment in patients using OAM (as described and published in 200917) to obtain additional guidelines, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between October 2007 and October 2012 (Tables I and II). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Guideline websites (the National Guideline Clearinghouse [www.guidelines.gov], the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [//www.sign.ac.uk

Results

The systematic literature search for guidelines from October 2007 to October 2012 yielded 74 citations (MEDLINE, 45; Embase, 22; and the Guideline websites, 7) (see Tables I and II). Of these, only 2 guideline publications met the inclusion criteria.20, 21 Furthermore, one systematic review and meta-analysis was published in 2009 on dental procedures in patients using warfarin, which reviewed all studies that appeared until June 2008.22 Napenas et al.23 performed a systematic review on dental

Discussion and Conclusions

Since the publication in 2007 of 2 evidence-based guidelines in the United Kingdom and the United States,18, 19 some additional evidence has emerged from 2 guideline publications, one systematic review on antiplatelet therapy and dental procedures,23 and one meta-analysis on procedures in patients using VKAs.22 Both systematic reviews conclude in concordance with the earlier published guidelines, stating that “continuing the regular dose of warfarin therapy does not seem to confer an increased

References (35)

  • J.W. Little

    New oral anticoagulants: will they replace warfarin?

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol

    (2012)
  • S.R.K. Seshasai et al.

    Effect of aspirin on vascular and nonvascular outcomes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Arch Intern Med

    (2012)
  • K.L. Furie et al.

    Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Stroke

    (2010)
  • C. Baigent et al.

    Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • F. Dentali et al.

    Combined aspirin-oral anticoagulant therapy compared with oral anticoagulant therapy alone among patients at risk for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

    Arch Intern Med

    (2007)
  • M.J. Wahl

    Dental surgery in anticoagulated patients

    Arch Intern Med

    (1998)
  • G. Piersma-Wichers

    [Coagulation disorders: risk factors for bleeding at dental procedures]

    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd

    (1998)
  • Cited by (70)

    • The Dentoalveolar Surgical Patient: Perioperative Principles Based on Contemporary Controversies

      2020, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Van Diermen and colleagues26 recommend discussion with the patient’s physician if the INR is greater than 3.5 and complicated oral surgery is planned. Other studies did not confirm the association of increased risk of bleeding and a high INR.26 Bajkin and colleagues27 studied 54 patients with INR values between 3.5 and 4.2 who had up to 3 teeth extracted and recorded postoperative bleeding at 3.7% (2/54).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text