Elsevier

Midwifery

Volume 45, February 2017, Pages 7-13
Midwifery

A socioecological model of posttraumatic stress among Australian midwives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.12.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Recalled reactions of horror and feelings of guilt during or shortly after witnessing birth trauma predicted probable posttraumatic stress disorder among midwives.

  • Witnessing birth trauma can reactivate personal traumatic birth experiences among midwives.

  • Posttraumatic stress symptoms were associated with intention to leave the profession and may contribute to attrition in midwifery.

Abstract

Objective

to develop a comprehensive model of personal, trauma event-related and workplace-related risk factors for posttraumatic stress subsequent to witnessing birth trauma among Australian midwives.

Design

a descriptive, cross-sectional design was used.

Participants

members of the Australian College of Midwives were invited to complete an online survey.

Measurements

the survey included items about witnessing a traumatic birth event and previous experiences of life trauma. Trauma symptoms were assessed with the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale Self-Report measure. Empathy was assessed with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Decision authority and psychological demand in the workplace were measured with the Job Content Questionnaire. Variables that showed a significant univariate association with probable posttraumatic stress disorder were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model.

Findings

601 completed survey responses were analysed. The multivariable model was statistically significant and explained 27.7% (Nagelkerke R square) of the variance in posttraumatic stress symptoms and correctly classified 84.1% of cases. Odds ratios indicated that intention to leave the profession, a peritraumatic reaction of horror, peritraumatic feelings of guilt, and a personal traumatic birth experience were strongly associated with probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Conclusions

risk factors for posttraumatic stress following professional exposure to traumatic birth events among midwives are complex and multi-factorial. Posttraumatic stress may contribute to attrition in midwifery. Trauma-informed care and practice may reduce the incidence of traumatic births and subsequent posttraumatic stress reactions in women and midwives providing care.

Introduction

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a trauma-related condition which may develop in response to exposure to a disturbing event (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Posttraumatic stress in midwives is an emergent field of research. Sheen et al. (2015) investigated posttraumatic stress in UK midwives (n=421) and reported that 33% experienced symptoms commensurate with posttraumatic stress disorder. In the USA, Beck et al. (2015) found that 36% of a sample of 473 nurse-midwives showed clinically significant trauma symptoms. Little is known about PTSD among Australian midwives. However, in a qualitative investigation, Rice and Warland (2013) interviewed ten midwives about their experiences of exposure to birth trauma in the Australian health care context. Using thematic analysis of the data, the authors identified: (1) distress arising from midwives’ desire to provide ‘woman-centred care’ within the constraints of the medical model; (2) feelings of responsibility and guilt because some traumatic situations were caused by suboptimal care; and (3) midwives’ strong empathic feelings for the women in their care.

The existence of PTSD symptoms among midwives may have important implications for midwifery practice. Posttraumatic stress can reduce empathic capacities (Parlar et al., 2014, Nietlisbach et al., 2010) and in health care professionals, can contribute to emotionally-distant care. In a qualitative study with ambulance personnel, Jonsson and Segesten (2004) found that posttraumatic stress symptoms led to emotional numbing. Ambulance personnel reported reduced empathy for patients as a means of coping with and preventing the development of trauma symptoms. Emotionally-distant midwifery care may contribute to feelings of being unsupported among women during labour and birth. Experiences of unsupportive care have been associated with decreased maternal perinatal mental health and can have lasting effects beyond the postnatal period (Creedy and Gamble, 2007, Ford and Ayers, 2011).

A relationship has been identified between exposure to traumatic events and an overestimation of clinical risk and defensive practice by health professionals. Exposure to a traumatic event almost doubled the likelihood of practising defensive medicine in a sample of 1313 physicians (Panella et al., 2016). In emergency personnel with PTSD (n=100), biases in risk judgement also extended to clinical situations that were previously perceived to be benign (Nortje et al., 2004). Qualitative research on midwives’ experiences of witnessing birth trauma suggests that exposure to traumatic birth affects their assessment of obstetric risk (Beck et al., 2015) and leads them to practise in a defensive manner (Sheen et al., 2016).

Exposure to birth trauma among women for whom midwives provide care may contribute to the development of posttraumatic stress. In Australia, it is estimated that up to one-third of women experience childbirth as traumatic (Alcorn et al., 2010). Sheen et al. (2015) found that both witnessing and hearing women's accounts of a traumatic birth event predicted posttraumatic stress among midwives in the UK. However, Sheen et al.’s (2015) model accounted for only 6% of the variance in posttraumatic stress symptoms, suggesting that factors not considered in their predictive model may contribute to the development of posttraumatic stress.

Some researchers have proposed a ‘socioecological model’ of trauma based on the assumption that responses to trauma are determined by interactions among contextual factors (Campbell et al., 2009, Harvey, 1996). In line with tenets of a socioecological model, the multifactorial nature of PTSD has been confirmed by systematic reviews with large samples of military and civilian participants. These studies found associations between PTSD and interpersonal traumatic experiences, female gender, vulnerable personality traits, emotional reactions during and shortly after the event, lack of support and coincidental life stress (Brewin et al., 2000b, Ozer et al., 2003). Reviews of risk factors for work-related posttraumatic stress similarly suggest that an interplay of personal, trauma-related and work environment-related variables is key for the development of work-related PTSD (Sheen et al., 2014, Johnston and Kumar, 2010).

Previous traumatic experiences can increase the risk of developing posttraumatic stress following a current trauma experience (Graham-Kevan et al., 2015). The salience of previous trauma experiences in the development of PTSD following subsequent trauma exposure has been demonstrated in two meta-analyses of over 46 studies with 17348 participants (Brewin et al., 2000a, Brewin et al., 2000b; Ozer et al., 2003). Brewin et al., 2000a, Brewin et al., 2000b concluded that a history of childhood abuse was correlated with the development of PTSD in trauma-exposed adults. Similarly, Ozer et al. (2003) found that prior trauma involving interpersonal violence predicted PTSD following current trauma exposure. However, Sheen et al. (2015) did not identify previous life trauma as a predictor for posttraumatic stress in midwives.

Negative emotions during or directly after a traumatic event, referred to as peritraumatic distress, are also known to increase the risk for PTSD (Ozer et al., 2003). As part of the World Mental Health Surveys, Karam et al. (2010) assessed the role of peritraumaticdistress in lifetime PTSD in 52,826 respondents from 21 countries. They found peritraumatic fear, horror and helplessness, significantly predicted a diagnosis of PTSD. Wallbank and Robertson (2013) identified negative emotions experienced at the time of caregiving predicted stress in staff who in their professional roles, witnessed miscarriage, stillbirth, and neonatal loss. In Rice and Warland's (2013) qualitative investigation, midwives described strong peritraumatic responses such as guilt and anger about what happened to women in their care.

Empathy has been identified as a risk factor for traumatic stress reactions in health professionals, which may be of particular salience for midwives (Sheen et al., 2014). In trauma workers, empathy was found to moderate associations between previous exposure to the traumatic event and secondary traumatic stress symptoms (MacRitchie and Leibowitz, 2010). Empathic identification, defined as the accurate emotional resonance and synchrony with another person (Newell et al., 2015), may serve as a professional tool for midwives (Leinweber and Rowe, 2010). Whilst empathic identification may facilitate supportive caregiving during labour and birth it may also place midwives at risk for traumatic stress.

Workplace decision authority describes the amount of influence employees have over the way they do their work (Karasek et al., 1998). In nurses, low levels of decision authority in the workplace have been associated with higher levels of occupational stress (Baba et al., 2013). The findings of studies with nurses suggest a relationship between opportunities for work-related control and work-related distress may also be relevant for midwives.

Work related stress is associated with trauma responses in health professionals (Sheen et al., 2014). Workplace psychological demand includes time pressure and the need to meet conflicting demands at work (Karasek et al., 1998). In nurses, high psychological demands in the workplace have been associated with increased anxiety and depression (Mark and Smith, 2012). These findings indicate that workplace psychological demands may adversely affect mental health and increase midwives’ risk for posttraumatic stress.

A socioecological model has not been described in midwifery workforce research. The aim of the present study was therefore to identify the personal, trauma event-related and workplace-related variables that predict posttraumatic stress following exposure to traumatic birth events among Australian midwives.

Section snippets

Study design

A descriptive, cross-sectional design was used.

Participants

Participants were midwives who held membership with the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). The ACM is the peak professional body for midwives in Australia. At the time of conducting the study the number of members, as estimated by an ACM representative, was 4578. A survey sample size calculation yielded a recommended sample of 580 in order to achieve a 99% confidence level with a 5% margin of error. Current registration as a midwife in Australia

Findings

Six hundred and one respondents completed the PTSD Symptom Scale Self-Report (PSS-SR) (estimated response fraction = 13%). Five hundred and seventy-eight respondents (578/601, 96%) provided complete data for all standardised measures and were included in the multivariate analysis. Cases with any missing responses were not included in the multivariate analysis.

Discussion

This paper presents the findings of the first population-based survey to investigate risk factors for probable PTSD among Australian midwives. Cross-sectional data analyses identified that probable PTSD was associated with a variety of personal, trauma-event related and workplace-related factors. This confirms the multifactorial nature of posttraumatic stress identified in other trauma samples (Brewin et al., 2000; Ozer et al., 2003; Johnston and Kumar, 2010). When adjusted for other risk

Conclusion

This study was the first of its kind to collect comprehensive data about risk factors for posttraumatic stress following professional exposure to traumatic birth events among Australian midwives. Some of the factors associated with posttraumatic stress in midwives were consistent with findings from other trauma samples. Peritraumatic feelings of horror and guilt and a personal traumatic experience when giving birth appeared to increase midwives’ vulnerability to the adverse psychological impact

Acknowledgements

Our thanks and appreciation to the midwives who took time out of their busy schedules to participate in this research. The study was supported by a Griffith University Postgraduate Research Scholarship.

References (60)

  • R. Pérez D'Gregorio

    Obstetric violence: a new legal term introduced in Venezuela

    International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    (2010)
  • H. Rice et al.

    Bearing witness: midwives experiences of witnessing traumatic birth

    Midwifery

    (2013)
  • K. Sheen et al.

    Exposure to traumatic perinatal experiences and posttraumatic stress symptoms in midwives: prevalence and association with burnout

    International Journal of Nursing Studies

    (2015)
  • K. Sheen et al.

    The experience and impact of traumatic perinatal event experiences in midwives: a qualitative investigation

    International Journal of Nursing Studies

    (2016)
  • S. Wallbank et al.

    Predictors of staff distress in response to professionally experienced miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal loss: a questionnaire survey

    International Journal of Nursing Studies

    (2013)
  • K. Zelazny et al.

    Confirmatory factor analyses of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in psychiatric samples differing in Criterion A status

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (2015)
  • K.L. Alcorn et al.

    A prospective longitudinal study of the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from childbirth events

    Psychological Medicine

    (2010)
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2011. Adult manifestations of childhood sexual abuse. Committee...
  • American Psychiatric Association, 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edn). Author,...
  • Australian Institute for Health and Welfare, 2014. Nursing and Midwifery Workforce 2013 [Online]. Canberra: Author....
  • V. Baba et al.

    Stress among nurses: a multi-nation test of the demand-control-support model

    Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal

    (2013)
  • J. Barlow et al.

    Midwifery practice and sexual abuse

    British Journal of Midwifery

    (2004)
  • C. Beck et al.

    A mixed-methods study of secondary traumatic stress in certified nurse-midwives: shaken belief in the birth process

    Journal of Midwifery and Womens Health

    (2015)
  • M.A. Bohren et al.

    The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review

    PLoS Medicine

    (2015)
  • M. Bouton et al.

    Some biobehavioral insights into persistent effects of emotional trauma

  • C. Brewin et al.

    Fear, helplessness, and horror in posttraumatic stress Disorder: investigating DSM-IV Criterion A2 in Victims of Violent Crime

    Journal of Traumatic Stress

    (2000)
  • C. Brewin et al.

    Meta-analysis of risk factors for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in trauma-exposed adults

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2000)
  • C. Bunch

    Oxford Dictionary of Psychology

    (2007)
  • R. Campbell et al.

    An Ecological Model of the Impact of Sexual Assault On Women's Mental Health

    Trauma, Violence, Abuse

    (2009)
  • A. Charuvastra et al.

    Social bonds and posttraumatic stress disorder

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2008)
  • Cited by (25)

    • A national survey of Australian midwives’ birth choices and outcomes

      2023, Women and Birth
      Citation Excerpt :

      For those midwives reporting negative or traumatic births, this was connected to receiving obstetric interventions, and or care they described as being akin to being assaulted [13]. In a study of post-traumatic stress among midwives, more than one-fifth of midwives (22%) reported a traumatic experience when giving birth themselves [14]. Midwives who have experienced their own traumatic births have a twofold increase in risk for developing PTSD, with a possibility of re-traumatisation after witnessing traumatic births in the workplace[14].

    • Providing maternity care for disadvantaged women in Aotearoa New Zealand: The impact on midwives

      2022, Women and Birth
      Citation Excerpt :

      The emotional health of the midwife is increasingly being studied because of the concerns with sustainability of the profession. Poor emotional health has been attributed to aspects of work settings such as shift length and working practices [31], dysfunctional working cultures and inadequate support [30], model of care [32], a fragmented maternity system [33], bullying and interprofessional conflict [34] and traumatic clinical experiences [35]; In their study exploring the emotional wellbeing of midwives (which involved 1073 NZ midwives), Dixon et al. [36] found that stress and depression levels were high for all midwives but that community midwives providing continuity of care had better emotional health than midwives working in hospitals. A similar finding was identified in an Australian cohort [32], thus suggesting that work setting has a strong influence on midwives emotional wellbeing.

    • Catastrophic thinking: Is it the legacy of traumatic births? Midwives’ experiences of shoulder dystocia complicated births

      2021, Women and Birth
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fear, anxiety, guilt, shame, vulnerability and reduced professional confidence are among the most common feelings experienced by midwives after a traumatic birth [4–8]. Adverse outcomes may go beyond these, and include post-trauma stress disorder (PTSD), compassion fatigue, burnout and workforce attrition [6,9]. Altogether, these consequences shape the phenomenon which is known as the ‘second victim’.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text