Advance Care Planning in the Elderly

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2014.11.010Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Advance care planning (ACP) can help individuals and their loved ones receive medical care that is aligned with their values, and experience more satisfaction and peace of mind.

  • ACP involves a process identifying personal values first, and then translating those values into medical care plans.

  • ACP can be viewed as a health behavior that involves multiple steps and evolves as a process over time.

  • Clinicians can assist older adults with ACP through assessing readiness, promoting identification and

What is advance care planning?

ACP is the process of planning for future medical care with the goal of helping patients receive medical care that is aligned with their preferences, especially in the setting of serious illness or as the end of life approaches. Table 1 provides common terms and definitions used in ACP. For example, one component of ACP is advance directives, which include medical power of attorney appointments or living wills; these written forms facilitate end-of-life decision making based on a patient’s

The need for advance care planning in the elderly

Benefits of ACP include the following:

  • Ability to identify, respect, and implement an individual’s wishes for medical care, especially in the absence of decision-making capacity, during serious illness, or near the end of life2

  • Ability to manage personal affairs while able, peace of mind, less burden on loved ones, and peace within the family6

  • Reduction in stress, anxiety, and depression in surviving family members4

  • Improved patient satisfaction and quality of life7, 8

  • Decreased use of intensive

Key concepts in advance care planning

Key steps in ACP are (1) assessing patient readiness and identifying barriers, (2) identifying surrogate decision makers, (3) asking about individuals’ values related to quality of life and serious illness, (4) documenting ACP preferences, and (5) translating individuals’ preferences into medical care plans. Table 2 summarizes brief approaches to each key concept.

ACP is a stepwise process that does not need to occur in a single clinic visit; it is a process that can unfold over time. For

Special considerations for advance care planning in the elderly

As clinicians and the outpatient care team undertake ACP, there are special considerations to account for in the older adult, such as:

  • Presence of cognitive impairment, suggesting the need to assess decision-making capacity38 related to ACP and to involve surrogates if available

  • Living apart from a potential surrogates (ie, long-distance family member)

  • Lack of available surrogates owing to absent or fractured relationships or the death of loved ones

  • Prior ACP, especially advance directives that are

Team-based approaches to advance care planning

As patients engage in ACP, clinicians and the outpatient care team can work together to support ongoing values: clarification discussions; education and counseling about risks, benefits, and burdens of medical treatment options; and communication with patients, surrogates, and the health care system as patients’ health status, needs, and preferences change over time. The multidisciplinary team can use the key concepts as guides to identify how patients may have engaged in ACP or brief

New patient-centered advance care planning tools

Recent advances in ACP include the development of accessible tools to assist patients with knowledge and decision making related to ACP. Because ACP can be a personnel-intensive and time-intensive process, helping patients and families begin this process on their own is useful. In a randomized controlled trial, a patient-completed preference form increased ACP communication from 11% to 30%.41 Although not all tools have been formally tested in research settings, various tools offer practical

Summary

Clinicians who care for older adults can engage older adults in ACP through multiple brief discussions over time. ACP emphasizes choosing a surrogate decision maker, identifying personal values, communicating values and preferences with surrogates and clinicians, documenting preferences for future medical care, and appointing a surrogate decision maker in advance directives in addition to, when appropriate, translating preferences into specific medical treatment plans or medical orders. While

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (51)

  • W.M. Tierney et al.

    The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2001)
  • A.A. Wright et al.

    Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment

    JAMA

    (2008)
  • E.K. Fromme et al.

    Association between physician orders for life-sustaining treatment for scope of treatment and in-hospital death in Oregon

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2014)
  • L.H. Nicholas et al.

    Regional variation in the association between advance directives and end-of-life Medicare expenditures

    JAMA

    (2011)
  • K. Ache et al.

    Are advance directives associated with better hospice care?

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2014)
  • K.T. Kirchhoff et al.

    Effect of a disease-specific advance care planning intervention on end-of-life care

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2012)
  • B.J. Hammes et al.

    A comparative, retrospective, observational study of the prevalence, availability, and specificity of advance care plans in a county that implemented an advance care planning microsystem

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2010)
  • S.E. Hickman et al.

    A comparison of methods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities: traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2010)
  • S.W. Tolle et al.

    A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1998)
  • J. Teno et al.

    Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1997)
  • K.E. Covinsky et al.

    Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2000)
  • J.M. Teno et al.

    Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2007)
  • M.J. Silveira et al.

    Advance directive completion by elderly Americans: a decade of change

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2014)
  • D.K. Heyland et al.

    Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning

    JAMA Intern Med

    (2013)
  • S.C. Ahluwalia et al.

    Barriers and strategies to an iterative model of advance care planning communication

    Am J Hosp Palliat Care

    (2014)
  • Cited by (119)

    • Emotional work stress reactions of emergency medical technicians involved in transporting out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with “do not attempt resuscitation” orders

      2022, Resuscitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, even in the United States, only about 20% of patients discussed ACP with family physicians.12 Appropriate ACP, including DNAR orders, is an important process for patients, their surrogates, and health systems because it increases dignity, autonomy, intimacy, and peace at the time of death, decreases grieving, lessens family members’ risk of mental health issues, and decreases utilization of resources and health care costs.29,30 Our study also showed that defibrillation of OHCA/DNAR patients was associated with high levels of stress for EMTs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text