Elsevier

The Knee

Volume 21, Issue 2, March 2014, Pages 631-634
The Knee

Arthroscopic washout of the knee: A procedure in decline

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.02.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a chronic, progressive condition which often requires surgical intervention. The evidence for the benefits of arthroscopic debridement or washout for knee OA is weak and arthroscopy is currently only indicated in the UK if there is a history of mechanical locking of the knee.

Objectives

To investigate whether there has been any change in the number of arthroscopies performed in the UK since the 2007 NICE guidance on knee arthroscopy and the 2008 Cochrane review of arthroscopic debridement for OA of the knee.

Methods

We interrogated data from the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) database with Office of Population Censuses and Surveys-4 (OPSC-4) codes pertaining to therapeutic endoscopic operations in the 60–74 year old and 75 and over age groups.

Results

The number of arthroscopic knee interventions in the UK decreased overall from 2000 to 2012, with arthroscopic irrigations decreasing the most by 39.6 per 100,000 population (80%). However, the number of arthroscopic meniscal resections increased by 105.3 per 100,000 (230%) population. These trends were mirrored in both the 60–74 and 75 and over age groups.

Conclusions

Knee arthroscopy in the 60–74 and 75 and over age groups appears to be decreasing but there is still a large and increasing number of arthroscopic meniscal resections being performed.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide [1]. It is a chronic condition characterised by pain, stiffness and reduced function. Pathologically, there is involvement of all joint structures but the key features of OA are a reduction in articular cartilage synthesis with an increase in cartilage degradation [2] together with changes in the subchondral bone [3]. There is no single risk factor for the development of OA. It is a complex, multifactorial disease that occurs as a result of genetic predisposition [4], obesity [5], ageing [6] and excessive joint loading [7], [8], [9]. Epidemiologically, there is a strong female preponderance [10] and there is some difference in the prevalence between racial groups depending on the joint in question [11]. Although there are no recent estimates of the prevalence of OA, it may be as high as 8.5 million in the UK population [12]. Initial treatment currently focuses on conservative measures including analgesia with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and local muscle-strengthening exercise [1]. However due to the progressive nature of OA, these initial measures eventually become ineffective for most patients, in terms of pain control, functionality and overall quality of life.

Arthroscopic washout for knee OA is thought to offer short-term symptomatic relief by reducing the inflammatory response mounted against debris, such as articular cartilage fragments and crystals, which accumulate in the synovial cavity [13], [14]. Arthroscopic debridement is similarly thought to offer short-term pain relief as well as short-term increased function by resecting pathological structures such as unstable articular cartilage, proliferative synovium, torn menisci and osteophytes [15].

Based on the available evidence, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) issued the following guidance [16] in 2007: “Referral for arthroscopic lavage and debridement should not be offered as part of treatment for osteoarthritis, unless the person has knee osteoarthritis with a clear history of mechanical locking”. A 2008 Cochrane review [17] of the evidence for knee arthroscopy concluded that there was no benefit, functionally or in terms of pain relief, from arthroscopic washout or debridement for knee OA, when compared to each other or with placebo. In the United States, there has been considerable discrepancy between actual clinical practice and the recommendation of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons against the use of arthroscopy for the treatment of knee OA [18] as nearly 1 in 5 patients had potentially been inappropriately treated with arthroscopy for knee OA [19]. To date, there has been no evaluation of the number of arthroscopic procedures performed in the UK on patients with knee OA since the 2007 NICE guidance [16] and 2008 Cochrane review [17] on arthroscopy for knee OA. Therefore, in order to assess whether current clinical practice is in accordance with the latest guidance and evidence, we looked at the number of arthroscopic procedures performed since 2000.

Section snippets

Methods

Data on arthroscopic procedures performed in the UK was obtained online from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). HES is an annual collection of hospital records of all patients admitted to National Health Service (NHS) hospitals, including outpatient appointments [20]. OPSC-4 procedure codes were chosen based on those cited in the latest NICE guidance on arthroscopy for knee OA [16] to identify arthroscopic interventions that were most likely to correspond to debridement and washout (Table 1).

Results

Between 2000 and 2012 there was a decrease in the number of most arthroscopic knee interventions being performed, except for meniscal resection, which increased. The largest decrease was in the number of irrigations performed, which fell by 39.6 per 100,000 population (80%) (Fig. 1). The smallest decrease, 0.94 per 100,000 population (26%), was in the number of loose bodies removed, which remained almost constant from 2000 to 2012, except for a peak in 2008 (Fig. 2). The number of other

Discussion

The number of arthroscopies performed for knee OA appears to be decreasing. The increase in the number of arthroscopic meniscal resections is difficult to explain since it is well established that even partial meniscectomy is a risk factor for the development of OA [23], [24], [25]. The NICE guidance and 2008 Cochrane review on arthroscopy for knee OA appear to have had more impact on debridement rather than washout rates, since washout rates have constantly declined from 2000 whereas the

Conclusion

There has been a steady decline in the number of arthroscopies performed in the UK on patients aged over 60. This may be as a result of NICE guidance and the 2008 Cochrane review which concluded that there was no benefit in performing arthroscopic debridement in undiscriminated OA of the knee. The increase in the number of arthroscopic meniscal resections performed may warrant further evaluation in its own right considering the potential adverse outcomes associated with meniscal resection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors did not receive funding for this study.

References (26)

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Osteoarthrtitis. GC177

    (2014)
  • D.B. Burr

    The importance of subchondral bone in the progression of osteoarthritis

    J Rheumatol

    (2004)
  • T.D. Spector et al.

    Risk factors for osteoarthritis: genetics

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2004)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Articular cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering techniques: Recent advances and challenges

      2021, Bioactive Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      As the least invasive surgical technique, arthroscopic debridement needs to wash and suck out all the cartilage or bone debris in the damaged area first and then remove the degenerated meniscus, ligament loose bodies, chondral fragments and the redundant synovia [54–56]. Although arthroscopic washout and debridement were considered to provide a short-term symptomatic relief by reducing the inflammatory response and resecting the pathological structures [57,58], the clinical usage of those procedures is in decline over the last decade since that weak support could be found for the benefit of arthroscopic lavage and debridement [54,59]. With the intent to produce a macroscopically smooth edge without damaging the surrounding cartilage by utilizing mechanical tools or radiofrequency energy, chondroplasty is thought to be palliative as well.

    • The incidence and impact of arthroscopy in the year prior to total knee arthroplasty

      2017, Knee
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is in contrast to the volume of arthroscopies being performed, which has remained static or indeed increased in some published cohorts [17,18,20]. This discord can potentially be explained by the rise seen in arthroscopic meniscectomy, which more than doubled in the UK for patients over 60 between 2000 to 2012 [21]. This trend for a greater proportion of arthroscopic surgeries being recorded as meniscal procedures was also seen in Denmark and Finland over a similar time period [22,23].

    • Mechanical symptoms as an indication for knee arthroscopy in patients with degenerative meniscus tear: a prospective cohort study

      2016, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, these guidelines still leave an option for arthroscopic surgery for patients with a diagnosis of meniscus tear5,6 or refrain from any recommendations for such patients4. An obvious change in arthroscopic practice has ensued: decline in the incidence of debridements or lavages for knee OA has been compensated for by a commensurate increase in the incidence of meniscal surgeries (meniscectomies)7–10. Recently published high-quality RCTs challenge even the indications of meniscus surgery, as they have consistently shown that in patients with a degenerative meniscus tear and mild or no OA, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) does not provide a better outcome than physical therapy or sham surgery11,12.

    • Is It Time to Bring Back Knee Washout?

      2022, Journal of Rheumatology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text