Clinical Study
Irreversible Electroporation for Nonthermal Tumor Ablation in the Clinical Setting: A Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.028Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To provide an overview of current clinical results of irreversible electroporation (IRE), a novel, nonthermal tumor ablation technique that uses electric pulses to induce cell death, while preserving structural integrity of bile ducts and vessels.

Methods

All in-human literature on IRE reporting safety or efficacy or both was included. All adverse events were recorded. Tumor response on follow-up imaging from 3 months onward was evaluated.

Results

In 16 studies, 221 patients had 325 tumors treated in liver (n = 129), pancreas (n = 69), kidney (n = 14), lung (n = 6), lesser pelvis (n = 1), and lymph node (n = 2). No major adverse events during IRE were reported. IRE caused only minor complications in the liver; however, three major complications were reported in the pancreas (bile leak [n = 2], portal vein thrombosis [n = 1]). Complete response at 3 months was 67%–100% for hepatic tumors (93%–100% for tumors < 3 cm). Pancreatic IRE combined with surgery led to prolonged survival compared with control patients (20 mo vs 13 mo) and significant pain reduction.

Conclusions

In cases where other techniques are unsuitable, IRE is a promising modality for the ablation of tumors near bile ducts and blood vessels. This articles gives an extensive overview of the available evidence, which is limited in terms of quality and quantity. With the limitations of the evidence in mind, IRE of central liver tumors seems relatively safe without major complications, whereas complications after pancreatic IRE appear more severe. The available limited results for tumor control are generally good. Overall, the future of IRE for difficult-to-reach tumors appears promising.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

This review was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for reporting systematic reviews (17). The reviewers agreed to the terminology suggested by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) in “Image-Guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria” (18).

Results

The searches identified 232 hits in PubMed and 353 in EMBASE. After removal of duplicates and exclusion based on title and abstract, 26 remaining articles were reviewed. The final analysis included 16 full-text articles (Fig 2). The articles were published between August 2010 and November 2013. Six articles were case reports and 10 were case series. The quality assessment summary scores of the included studies are shown in Figure 3. The entire list of ratings for each study is available in

Discussion

Intentional cell death induced by IRE for tumor ablation has been studied in recent years. Extensive preclinical testing of the potential advantage of preservation of extracellular matrix structures in the absence of thermal coagulation was performed before IRE was introduced in the clinical setting. The results found in this review are discussed further here.

References (55)

  • G. Narayanan et al.

    Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2012)
  • S. Bagla et al.

    Percutaneous irreversible electroporation of surgically unresectable pancreatic cancer: a case report

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2012)
  • P. Hadjicostas et al.

    Radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic cancer

    HPB

    (2006)
  • E.W. Lee et al.

    Irreversible electroporation in eradication of rabbit VX2 liver tumor

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2012)
  • M. Pavlin et al.

    Effect of cell electroporation on the conductivity of a cell suspension

    Biophys J

    (2005)
  • M. Ahmed et al.

    Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation

    Radiology

    (2011)
  • E.W. Lee et al.

    Irreversible electroporation: a novel image-guided cancer therapy

    Gut Liver

    (2010)
  • M.A. Phillips et al.

    Irreversible electroporation on the small intestine

    Br J Cancer

    (2012)
  • G. Onik et al.

    Irreversible electroporation: implications for prostate ablation

    Technol Cancer Res Treat

    (2007)
  • H. Schoellnast et al.

    Irreversible electroporation adjacent to the rectum: evaluation of pathological effects in a pig model

    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

    (2012)
  • J.J. Wendler et al.

    Urinary tract effects after multifocal nonthermal irreversible electroporation of the kidney: acute and chronic monitoring by magnetic resonance imaging, intravenous urography and urinary cytology

    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

    (2012)
  • M. Bower et al.

    Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas: definitive local therapy without systemic effects

    J Surg Oncol

    (2011)
  • W. Li et al.

    The effects of irreversible electroporation (IRE) on nerves

    PloS One

    (2011)
  • H. Schoellnast et al.

    The delayed effects of irreversible electroporation ablation on nerves

    Eur Radiol

    (2013)
  • E.W. Lee et al.

    Advanced hepatic ablation technique for creating complete cell death: irreversible electroporation

    Radiology

    (2010)
  • Y. Guo et al.

    Irreversible electroporation therapy in the liver: longitudinal efficacy studies in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Cancer Res

    (2010)
  • A. Deodhar et al.

    Irreversible electroporation near the heart: ventricular arrhythmias can be prevented with ECG synchronization

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2011)
  • Cited by (327)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

    Appendices A and B are available online at www.jvir.org.

    View full text