ReviewMethodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess habitual physical activity in children aged 0–5 years
Introduction
Objective measurement of habitual physical activity via accelerometry is becoming more common in paediatric populations where indirect methods such as self- and parent-proxy reports have a tendency to overestimate activity levels. Accelerometry has provided important insights into the lives of young children, enhancing our understanding of the patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviour,1 the influence of physical activity on health outcomes such as obesity2 and skeletal health,3 the correlates of physical activity4 and the efficacy of interventions designed to influence physical activity.5 However, researchers using accelerometers to assess physical activity in young children are faced with many methodological decisions when applying this technology and published studies report a wide variety of protocols,6, 7 making such methodological decisions difficult. The purpose of this paper is to review and critique the evidence evaluating different accelerometer methodologies used in young children (for this paper defined as between 0 and 5 years of age), in order to outline an evidence-guided methodological protocol for use in this age group. The paper will also identify gaps in the protocol where sufficient evidence is currently lacking and provides recommendations for future research that would enhance the strength of the evidence base.
Section snippets
Characterisation of physical activity in young children
Physical activity is often defined as any bodily movement generated by the skeletal muscles that raises energy expenditure above resting values.8, 9 Among children aged 0–5 years, this activity mainly takes the form of basic movements and fundamental movement skills, expressed through reflexes and reactions, unstructured activities such as physical activity play and moving to music and through structured activities such as swimming lessons, and simplified dance and gymnastics movements. The age
What is an accelerometer?
Accelerometers are instruments designed to measure time-varying differences in force or acceleration. When applied to the measurement of physical activity, an accelerometer can assess the magnitude and total volume of movement as a function of time. Most accelerometers used in physical activity assessment operate using piezoelectricity derived from microscopic crystalline structures. In such designs, force created from acceleration causes crystals to become stressed/compressed, which in turn
Methodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess physical activity in young children
An increase in the variety of commercially available accelerometers means that researchers face a daunting task when trying to make their selection. Descriptive characteristics, technical specifications and manufacturer details of 14 accelerometers for use in paediatric physical activity studies have been outlined in thorough reviews.15, 16, 17 Factors that may influence the monitor selection process have also been discussed previously6, 15, 17 and include direct and ongoing costs (e.g.
Evidence-guided protocol for using accelerometers to assess physical activity in young children
Critique of the available evidence on accelerometer methodological issues in children aged 0–5 years has provided a basis for the development of a recommended users protocol in this age group (see Table 2). Because of the absence of methodological studies in children <3 years, a protocol for the use of accelerometers in such children cannot be specified. Therefore, extrapolation from studies in 3–5-year-old children would be recommended, and formative studies examining the utility, feasibility
Recommendations for future research to enhance the use of accelerometers for physical activity assessment in young children
Taking into consideration the available evidence and the gaps in the suggested methodological protocol, recommendations for future research that would assist in strengthening the protocol and assist users of accelerometers in making informed methodological decisions are warranted. Very few accelerometers have been validated in 3–5-year olds and investigations are required to demonstrate the accuracy and reproducibility of current and emerging devices. Preliminary studies exploring the utility,
Conclusion
The appropriate application of accelerometry for the assessment of physical activity requires careful deliberation in order to use the technology to provide accurate assessments of this behaviour. Review and critique of the literature investigating accelerometer methodological issues in young children provided in this paper has led to the development of an evidence-guided protocol for 3–5-year olds that will assist users of accelerometers in the decision-making process. Several areas within
Practical implications
- •
Accelerometer users should follow an evidence-guided protocol when applying this technology to assess physical activity behaviour in children.
- •
Critique of the literature investigating accelerometer methodological issues in young children has led to the development of an evidence-guided protocol for 3–5-year olds that is likely to evolve as further evidence emerges.
- •
Studies testing the utility, feasibility and validity of accelerometry in infants and toddlers will assist paediatric physical
Conflict of interest
There are no potential conflicts of interest that may affect the authors’ ability to provide an unbiased view.
References (65)
- et al.
Total energy expenditure and physical activity in young Scottish children: mixed longitudinal study
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
Does early physical activity predict body fat change throughout childhood?
Prev Med
(2003) - et al.
Reliability of physical activity measures from accelerometry among preschoolers in free-living conditions
Clin Nutr
(2007) - et al.
Fatness, physical activity, and television viewing in children during the adiposity rebound period: the Iowa Bone Development Study
Prev Med
(2002) - et al.
Relation between physical activity and energy expenditure in a representative sample of young children
Am J Clin Nutr
(2004) - et al.
Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children
Prev Med
(2006) - et al.
Factors associated with physical activity in preschool children
J Pediatr
(2002) - et al.
Compliance with physical activity guidelines: prevalence in a population of children and youth
Ann Epidemiol
(2002) - et al.
Physical activity and bone measures in young children: the Iowa Bone Development Study
Pediatrics
(2001) - et al.
Preschool children and physical activity: a review of correlates
Am J Prev Med
(2008)
Physical activity to prevent obesity in young children: cluster randomised controlled trial
BMJ
Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in children: an update
Pediatr Exerc Sci
Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables
Med Sci Sports Exerc
Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research
Pub Health Rep
Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults
The level and tempo of children's physical activities: an observational study
Med Sci Sports Exerc
The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future
Med Sci Sports Exerc
Children, adolescents and television
Pediatrics
Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research
Med Sci Sports Exerc
Physical activity in preschoolers: understanding prevalence and measurement issues
Sports Med
Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data
Arch Dis Child
Using the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in preschool children
Pediatr Exerc Sci
Calibration and evaluation of an objective measure of physical activity in pre-school children
J Phys Act Health
Comparison of two accelerometers for assessment of physical activity in preschool children
Pediatr Exerc Sci
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Lancet
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
Stat Methods Med Res
Validity of the Actigraph and Actical accelerometers in 3- to 5-year-old children (abstract)
Pediatr Exerc Sci
Monitoring of physical activity in young children: how much is enough?
Pediatr Exerc Sci
Physical activity patterns of kindergarten children in comparison to teenagers and young adults
Eur J Public Health
Estimating physical activity from incomplete accelerometer data in field studies
J Phys Act Health
Cited by (340)
Validity of low-cost measures for global surveillance of physical activity in pre-school children: The SUNRISE validation study
2022, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportEnvironmental correlates of sedentary behaviors and physical activity in Chinese preschool children: A cross-sectional study
2022, Journal of Sport and Health ScienceDevelopment and content validity of an application to assess 24-hour movement behaviors in 0–4-year-old children involving end-users and key stakeholders: the My Little Moves app
2024, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical ActivityCompliance with the 24-h movement behaviors guidelines among urban and rural Brazilian preschoolers
2024, American Journal of Human Biology