Unpacking the terms of engagement with local food at the Farmers’ Market: Insights from Ontario
Introduction
Against the backdrop of an alleged decoupling of agriculture and rural communities in many developed regions, it has been argued that local food systems have the capacity to forge or rekindle positive relationships between producers and consumers and unify farm and non-farm interests—especially at the local level (Hinrichs, 2003; Lyson, 2004). On the farm side rests the potential for farming on a human scale, the possibility of improved economic viability and the ability to contribute directly to the well being of the local community through the provision of a basic necessity—food. On the consumer side alleged potential benefits include knowledge of the origins of food, access to a fresher and more authentic food product and the ability to re-personalize agriculture in the context of their own lives. Spanning both groups are the regional economic benefits associated with retaining a greater portion of the farming and food dollar in the local economy, and the environmental benefits associated with less ecologically extractive farming systems.
Whilst the potential benefits of local food systems and short(er) supply chains have been chronicled widely (e.g. Feenstra, 2002; Hinrichs, 2003; Marsden et al., 2000; Morris and Buller, 2003; Renting et al., 2003, etc.) there remain important questions concerning how effective local networks can be constructed and how they might best function. In this respect the attention of researchers is shifting not only to the various structural forms that local food initiatives might assume, but also to the terms under which they might (or, in the minds of some, must) operate given that alternative food chains are socially constructed, operationalized and regulated (Marsden, 2000). It is in this context that we are drawn to the Farmers’ Market (FM) as not only a site of exchange, but also as a venue for negotiated meaning in the local food landscape. In practical terms the FM serves as a highly visible and intuitively obvious site for food producers and consumers to find each other—a physical space in which immediacy and directness can be (re)introduced into transactions around food (Holloway and Kneafsey, 2000). For producers this presents the possibility of capturing greater value from the food product being sold; for consumers the chance to obtain products with (allegedly) enhanced qualities such as freshness and superior taste (Lamine, 2005; Sage, 2003); and for organizational actors the chance to operationalize trade in local and quality food on terms that they can (attempt to) regulate.
For analysts, the FM holds intrigue given its status as a (constructed) space for the expression of ideas and values concerning local food and the nature of its alterity or ‘otherness’ (Kirwan, 2004). Indeed, some authors assert that the FM and other direct sale arrangements embody specific sets of values and ideologies amongst food producers and consumers (Kloppenberg et al., 2000; Hinrichs, 2003). Direct agricultural markets are touted as an alternative to mainstream food outlets where producer/consumer interactions have become secondary to convenience, low prices from bulk procurement and the availability of a vast variety of food products that transcend seasonal limitations and physical distance. For some, the FM represents a gathering place for ‘enlightened food producers’ and ‘concerned consumers’ (Weatherell et al., 2003). Following this logic, it is a place and space where people who care about healthy food, farming and the environment might gather to support local producers and each other. Therein lies potential for consumers to make informed decisions about the food they purchase. A common stereotype is that the FM customer is more inquisitive about the manner in which food is produced and would be more likely to support small-scale, family farms over large-scale corporately directed enterprises. The accuracy of this view is, of course, something that is amenable to empirical investigation, as will be shown later in the paper.
The above, though partial and generalized, reflects a set of emerging possibilities on one hand, and uncertainties on the other, regarding the FM. Whilst the (re)presentation of the contemporary FM in the literature draws heavily on the semantics of alternative agriculture, local food and new cultures of consumption, the empirical realities seem ambiguous and complicated. Clearly, the FM is an alternative to conventional large-scale supermarkets that has been re-invigorated as an economic entity and community institution by shifting preferences on the consumer side. Arguably it holds great promise-in-principle for the re-linking of producer and consumer interests. However, notwithstanding the crisp clarity of charter statements and the rhetoric of promotional communications, the relationship of individual FMs to local food initiatives needs to be seen in light of information on how and why specific groups of actors hold various beliefs and exhibit widely differing heuristics and strategies. In such an exercise the FM becomes a convenient laboratory in which it is possible to examine how certain contested and contingent notions of local, quality, authenticity and legitimacy find expression in communications and transactions around food. The possibility exists also that various participants within actor groups at the market mix their behaviours and beliefs in such a way as to defy easy characterization along the lines now deeply etched into conceptual framing of local food systems (Feagan et al., 2004; Kirwan, 2006).
The purpose of this paper is to contribute to an increasingly more nuanced understanding of the place of the FM vis a vis local food systems. Along the way, we wish to ascertain the degree to which certain tenets of local food are reflected in the FM experience as it is unfolding in developed regions where population densities and marketing traditions do not necessarily mirror the British and European experience. To this end we focus on the Province of Ontario, Canada. The research design implicates three actor groups—consumers, vendors/producers and market managers—and consciously moves beyond the documentation of contrasting beliefs and behaviours to explore how various actors at the market see and make assumptions about each other. In so doing the desire is to understand better how each group ‘reads’ the market as an operating space and subsequently negotiates terms of their involvement.
The balance of the paper is presented in three major sections. First, we review recent literature on alternative agriculture, local food systems and the FM as a means of foregrounding selected elements of our empirical analysis. In a second section, we present and interpret the findings of the research and move through the insights derived from analysis of the customer and vendor data, respectively. Manager perspectives are interwoven throughout to provide more generalized commentary, especially in relation to selected ‘policy dimensions’ of the FM. In reporting on consumer views, particular attention is given to the degree to which shoppers attach importance to several suggested characteristics of local food at the FM and to how these translate into expectations and conditions for participation. In reporting on vendor views, the role and significance of so-called ‘re-sellers’ at the FM is given particular attention. The paper concludes with some reflection on the degree to which the findings support, challenge or modify current normative beliefs about local food at the FM and about the nature of the FM itself.
Section snippets
Farm change, local food and the FM
Over the past several decades, farmers in North America and elsewhere have witnessed a continuous decline in the price of many agricultural commodities and an escalation of costs associated with inputs and infrastructure. This combination has resulted in the well-documented cost-price squeeze (Pierce, 1994). A fundamental shift in the traditional modes of agricultural production in recent decades has been linked with the rapid adoption and implementation of modern technologies (Troughton, 1992
Unpacking the FM experience in Ontario
Research was conducted across a sample of FMs in Ontario for the purpose of exploring how, why and with what beliefs and expectations consumers and producers operate within the space of the FM. Whilst a variety of shopper surveys have been completed by individual markets or by FM Associations (e.g., FMs Ontario), the emphasis has typically been on descriptive consumer data for purposes of ‘marketing the market’. Research by Feagan et al. (2004) extended this descriptive line of inquiry by
Reflections: (self) defining value and authenticity at the FM
This paper has attempted to respond to a growing recognition of the nuanced and negotiated meanings of local products, legitimate vending and strategic spending in contemporary transactions around local food. In particular we have sought to more fully problematize the FM as a site of engagement, given its growing profile in both the practice and portrayal of local food systems. The empirical analysis engaged, though by no means resolved, several of the normative elements of the FM as they seem
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (Sustainable Rural Communities Programme) in this research. We are grateful also to the shoppers, vendors and market managers who participated in the project. The paper benefited from the helpful comments of three anonymous reviewers.
References (62)
- et al.
Quality farm food in Europe: a possible alternative to the industrialised food market and to current agri-environmental policies: lessons from France
Food Policy
(1998) Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market
Journal of Rural Studies
(2000)The practice and politics of food system localization
Journal of Rural Studies
(2003)- et al.
Producer constructions of quality in regional specialty food production: a case study from south west England
Journal of Rural Studies
(2000) - et al.
Forecasting food supply chain developments in lagging rural regions: evidence from the UK
Journal of Rural Studies
(2004) The interpersonal world of direct marketing: Examining conventions of quality at UK farmers’ markets
Journal of Rural Studies
(2006)Social embeddedness and the relations of regard: alternative ‘good food’ networks in south-west Ireland
Journal of Rural Studies
(2003)- et al.
Social capital and farming at the rural–urban interface: the importance of nonfarmer and farmer relations
Agricultural Systems
(2003) - et al.
Environmental farm planning in Ontario: exploring participation and the endurance of change
Land Use Policy
(2003) - et al.
Across the divide (?): reconciling farm and town views of agriculture–community linkages
Journal of Rural Studies
(2005)
Agricultural adjustment: adoption of and adaptation to policy reform measures by large scale commercial farming
Land Use Policy
Productivism is allegedly dead, long live productivism. Evidence of continued productivist attitudes and decision making in South East England
Journal of Rural Studies
In search of the concerned consumer: UK public perceptions of food, farming and buying local
Journal of Rural Studies
Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism
Journal of Rural Studies
The capitalist composition of organic: the potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture
Agriculture and Human Values
From pillar to post? In search of the post-productivist countryside in Australia
Australian Geographer
Family and seller interactions in farmers’ markets in upstate New York
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
Consuming Geographies
Farmers’ Market Research 1940–2000: an inventory and review
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
From farm to table: the organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California
Sociologia Ruralis
Some reflections on late twentieth century agrarian political economy
Sociologia Ruralis
Expressing values in agricultural markets: an economic policy perspective
Agriculture and Human Values
Dependent reproduction of alternative modes of agriculture: organic farming in New Zealand
Sociologia Ruralis
Conceptualizing agriculture: a critique of post-productivism as the new orthodoxy
Progress in Human Geography
Niagara region farmers’ markets: local food systems and sustainability considerations
Local Environment
Local food systems and sustainable communities
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
Creating space for sustainable food systems
Agriculture and Human Values
Scaling up: bringing public institutions and food service corporations into the project for a local, sustainable food system in Ontario
Agriculture and Human Values
Rethinking production–consumption: integrative perspectives
Sociologia Ruralis
The industrial food stream and its alternatives in the United States: an introduction
Human Organization
Experiences and perspectives of farmers from Upstate New York farmers’ markets
Agriculture and Human Values
Cited by (156)
Systematizing authenticity and codifying values: The role of values, standards, and governance at farmers markets
2022, Journal of Rural StudiesConsumers' categorization of eco-friendly consumer goods: An integrative review and research agenda
2022, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionBlockchain: an enabler for safe food in global supply networks
2022, Present Knowledge in Food Safety: A Risk-Based Approach through the Food ChainConsumer renaissance in Alternative Agri-Food Networks between collective action and co-production
2022, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionProcuring for change: An exploration of the innovation potential of sustainable food procurement
2021, Journal of Cleaner Production