Original articles
The need for psychosocial support and its determinants in a sample of patients undergoing radiooncological treatment of cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The primary goal of this study was to examine the need for psychosocial support in a consecutive sample of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Out of an initial sample of 250 patients, 239 patients could be assessed at the beginning of their RT. Two hundred eight patients were reassessed at the end of RT 4–8 weeks later.

Methods

Measures comprised the Hornheide Screening Instrument, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, the Resilience Scale, and the Short Form 12 as a measure of health-related quality of life (QoL). Medical and radiological data were continuously registered.

Results

Within the sample, the need for psychosocial support as reflected in the screening instrument was high (>70%). Patients with the need for psychosocial support revealed significantly higher fatigue scores than patients who where not identified as needing psychosocial support. Furthermore, a negative correlation of the need for psychosocial support and QoL as well as resilience could be observed. QoL turned out to be the strongest predictor for the need of psychosocial support.

Conclusion

The study confirmed that the need for psychosocial support is an important aspect in the treatment of cancer patients undergoing RT, which appeared to be powerfully predicted by the patients' health-related QoL. Fatigue turned out to be an important illness- and treatment-related factor that affects QoL. Psychological interventions for cancer patients should explicitly focus on decreasing patients' fatigue and increasing their resilience, thus improving their QoL.

Introduction

Patients suffering from cancer are known to be highly distressed due to their disease as well as their sometimes invasive and aggressive therapies [1], [2]. A variety of stressors (e.g., fear of relapse, pain, problems in partnership) as well as acute side effects and sequelae of treatment may extensively reduce the patients' quality of life (QoL), which, in turn, can affect the course and success of treatment. Psychosocial support of cancer patients and help in coping with the disease is an important part of any comprehensive oncological therapy [3].

Radiooncological therapy (RT) is an effective treatment for malign tumors. Up to 80% of cancer patients experience fatigue during their treatment, which is known to be a very common side effect in cancer patients undergoing RT (e.g., Refs. [4], [5]). The etiology of cancer-related fatigue still remains unclear. The symptom is either associated with characteristics of the tumor, but also a consequence of the cancer (e.g., sleep disturbances or pain) [6], [7]. Furthermore, fatigue in cancer patients is often attributed to specific RT-related factors (e.g., the localization and the dosage of irradiated volume) [5], [8], and a relationship to anemia has been reported [9]. Fatigue in general comprises extreme tiredness and exhaustion resulting in poor physical (e.g., exhaustion), psychological (e.g., cognitive deficits, lack of motivation), and social functioning (e.g., isolation) [10], which, in turn, strongly affects correspondent dimensions of QoL.

Since fatigue dramatically affects QoL [11], one can assume that these constructs are reflected in the patients' need for psychosocial support. Health-related QoL describes a multidimensional psychological concept being characterized by psychological well-being, physical state, social relationships, and functional competence [12]. QoL is influenced not only by the individuals' lifestyle experiences and expectations but also by the side effects of RT, personality-related factors, ways of coping, and the availability of resources [13], [14]. Thus, it is assumed that patients suffering more strongly from side effects of RT such as fatigue report poorer health-related QoL than patients being less affected. An association between fatigue and QoL has been shown by several authors [14], [15].

Among the psychological factors, resilience as a personality-related factor might be of influence for the development/intensity of fatigue and reduced health-related QoL. The resilience construct refers to a psychological resistance enabling a person to manage critical life events such as a cancer disease (e.g., Ref. [16]). A resilient person is successful in activating latent resources that are necessary to manage such exceptional challenges. Based upon the assumption that resilience also includes emotional resistance relating to self-regulatory competence and adaptation [17], it is reasonable to expect that patients with low resilience would be less successful in mobilizing their inner resources for psychological coping (consequently suffer more from the side effects of RT) [18] and, thus, need more psychosocial support. Previous studies dealing with cancer patients revealed that resilience is positively related to quality of life [19] but still provides a different construct than optimism [20].

Furthermore, aspects of the patients' coping behavior (e.g., information about disease and treatment, optimism, the subjective desire for psychosocial support) have been tested as predictors of the need for psychosocial support. According to Fritzsche et al. [21], a discrepancy between the patients' distress and the wish for psychosocial support can be observed. Moreover, optimism turned out to be a salient predictor for the participation in supporting group [22].

In summary, this study aims to (a) determine the need for psychosocial support in a sample of patients undergoing RT and (b) test whether the patients' fatigue, health-related QoL, resilience, and aspects of coping behaviour would be related to this need. It is hypothesized that the need for psychosocial support is determined by the patients' QoL which, in turn, is influenced by their fatigue and resilience.

Section snippets

Sample

Out of 250 consecutive patients diagnosed with cancer, a total of 239 agreed to participate in the baseline assessment; 208 patients could be repeatedly assessed at the end of their treatment 4–8 weeks later (depending on the site and/or size of tumor). The remaining 31 patients were either lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study due to organizational reasons (e.g., not reachable at the end of RT, problems with time). Due to potential cognitive impairments, patients with tumors of the

Need for psychosocial support

Using the cut-off criterion described above, the need for psychosocial support of cancer patients receiving RT was more than 70% considering both assessments. Most of the patients (119 patients, 61.0%) turned out to be in need for psychosocial support at the beginning and at the end of RT. In contrast, only 36 patients (19%) did not show a need for psychosocial support at both phases of RT. Table 2 presents an HSI-item description including the results for the nine items.

According to the

Discussion

The results of this study undoubtedly confirm that cancer-related distress is a relevant problem among radiooncologically treated patients. This is one of the reasons why psychosocial support of cancer patients should be integrated into any oncological treatment.

The need for psychosocial support appeared to be high within the investigated sample (more than 70% at the beginning and at the end of RT). No effects of age and gender on the need for psychosocial support could be found, indicating

Conclusions

Regarding the importance of QoL in predicting the need for psychosocial support and the strong correlation of fatigue and resilience with the need for psychosocial support in this study, it appears necessary to focus on these factors within psychosocial interventions. Psychosocial support, therefore, should aim at providing strategies that relieve emotional disturbance, fear of tumor progression, and lack of self-confidence (within psychological sessions). Furthermore, physical discomfort and

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Wilhelm-Sander-Foundation (FKZ 2002.071.1).

References (35)

  • Jereczek-FossaBA et al.

    Radiotherapy related fatigue

    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol

    (2002)
  • StoneP et al.

    Review: fatigue in patients with cancer

    Eur J Cancer

    (1998)
  • SmetsEM et al.

    The multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue

    J Psychosom Res

    (1995)
  • FarberE et al.

    Resilience factors associated with adaptation to HIV disease

    Psychosomatics

    (2000)
  • WeitznerMA et al.

    Cognitive functioning and quality of life in malignant glioma patients: a review of literature

    Psychooncology

    (1998)
  • HohenbergG et al.

    Coping with disease and management of therapy in patients with cancer with special reference to radiotherapy: an overview

    Strahlenther Onkol

    (1989)
  • NBCC (National Breast Cancer Centre) and NCCI (National Cancer Control Initiative)

    Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown, NSW

    (2003)
  • AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)

    Management of cancer symptoms: Pain, depression, and fatigue. Evidence report number 61

    (2002)
  • GlausA et al.

    A qualitative study to explore the concept of fatigue/ tiredness in cancer patients and in healthy individuals

    Support Care Cancer

    (1996)
  • StasiR et al.

    Cancer-related fatigue: evolving concepts in evaluation and treatment

    Cancer

    (2003)
  • LudwigH et al.

    Anemia in cancer patients

    Semin Oncol

    (1998)
  • Rijt van derCC et al.

    Fatigue in advanced cancer: a study on the different dimensions and their correlates

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • CellaD

    Factors influencing quality of life in cancer patients: anemia and fatigue

    Semin Oncol

    (1998)
  • BullingerM et al.

    SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Handanweisung

    (1998)
  • FawzyFI et al.

    Critical review of psychosocial interventions in cancer care

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • SchwartzAL

    Fatigue mediates the effects of exercise on quality of life

    Qual Life Res

    (1999)
  • BrählerES et al.

    The extent of tiredness and fatigue in the age group over 60 years in a healthy German population sample

    Psychotherapeut

    (2001)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Disentangling the effects of efficacy-facilitating informational support on health resilience in online health communities based on phrase-level text analysis

      2020, Information and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the healthcare area, social support has been considered not only a protective factor against life stresses and poor health [3], but also a critical factor for successful living with illness [32]. Indeed, social support is highly associated with various aspects of resilience in several clinical areas [32–36], including psychological health. According to Schleussner et al. [35], the “need” for psychosocial support indicates low resilience and quality of life.

    • Individual resilience in adult cancer care: Aconcept analysis

      2020, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      Positive adaption of an individual with cancer is often described as ‘personal growth’ (Hunter-Hern et al., 2015), ‘survive or get through cancer’ (Appleton et al., 2018; Davis et al., 2016), ‘struggle to adapt to the situation’ (Grunfeld et al., 2013; Reinwalds et al., 2018), ‘become someone new’ (Baker et al., 2016). The impact of resilience on psychological functioning also results in less need for psychosocial support (Brix et al., 2008). With respect to social functioning, research shows that resilience positively correlates with social functioning (Ristevska-Dimitrovska et al., 2015a; Schumacher et al., 2014) and social well-being is considered a form of exhibiting resilience (Hunter-Hern et al., 2015).

    • Does the concept of resilience contribute to understanding good quality of life in the context of epilepsy?

      2016, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Across these studies, resilience was explored in the context of a broad range of medical conditions — though there were none that explored it in the context of epilepsy. Many of the investigations focused on internal psychological concepts such as self-efficacy, optimism, benefit finding, self-esteem, and mastery, while a smaller number sought to explore the relationship between internal psychological and external social factors (see, for example, Sato et al. [31], Brix et al. [32], and Symister and Friend [33]). Collectively, the findings suggest that health professionals, as providers of information about chronic conditions and their treatment, may have an important role to play in fostering resilience.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text