Research Brief
College Students' Barriers and Enablers for Healthful Weight Management: A Qualitative Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2008.04.354Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To identify barriers and enablers for healthful weight management among college students.

Design

Sixteen on-line focus groups, homogeneous by sex and university.

Setting

Eight universities in 8 states.

Participants

College students (N = 115; 55% female; mean age 19.7 ± 1.6).

Analysis

Qualitative software, Nvivo version 2 (QSR International, Victoria, Australia, 2002), was used; similar codes were grouped together and categorized using an ecological model.

Results

Males and females cited the same barriers to weight management: intrapersonal (eg, temptation and lack of discipline); interpersonal (social situations); and environmental (eg, time constraints, ready access to unhealthful food). Similar enablers were identified by sex: intrapersonal (eg, regulating food intake, being physically active); interpersonal (social support); and environmental (eg, university's environment supports physical activity). More barriers than enablers were given, indicating that these college students were more sensitive to barriers than the enablers for weight management. Factors viewed by some students as barriers to weight management were viewed as enablers by others.

Conclusions and Implications

When designing weight management interventions for college students, sex specificity may not be as important as considering that a barrier for one student may be an enabler for another. From an ecological perspective, individually focused interventions must be implemented in conjunction with environmental-level interventions to facilitate behavior change.

Introduction

Entering college is a key transitional period for young adults.1 They face challenges adjusting to new surroundings and workloads, and many will have greater lifestyle freedom than ever before. Often these changes are associated with excessive weight gain.2 Low intake of fruits and vegetables, excess caloric intake, and lack of physical activity are frequently cited as reasons for weight problems in adults.3 Many college students have low intakes of fruits and vegetables and high intakes of food with excess calories, saturated fats, alcohol, and added sugars.4, 5 Based on national surveys of college students, only 5.7% report eating 5 or more daily servings of fruits and vegetables,6 62% report only 1-2 daily servings of fruits and vegetables,6 and 21.8% report eating 3 or more high-fat food items a day.7 Furthermore, college students as a population are physically inactive,8, 9 with only 20% reporting participation in moderate physical activity and 30% in vigorous physical activity on a regular basis.6, 10

The most rapid weight gain for adults is during their twenties,11 which may result in gains in weight and body fat above normal maturation.2, 12, 13 According to results of the 2006 American College Health Assessment, 4.5% of college students are underweight, 64.1% are a healthful weight, 21.9% are overweight, and 9.5% are obese, with rates of overweight and obesity higher among males than females.14 Excess weight gain during early adulthood may lead to increases in overweight and obesity later in life, with associated health consequences.15, 16 To prevent obesity, consuming a healthful diet and being physically active are important.17 Educators in nutrition and exercise science are key in developing effective interventions to prevent obesity.

To address topics such as body weight that may be considered sensitive, on-line focus groups provide a forum for preserving anonymity and increasing frank discussions.18 On-line focus groups may be especially suited to college students because of their familiarity with computers. Although paralinguistic cues and body language are not apparent during on-line focus groups, respondents easily communicate attitudes and personality through writing.19, 20

A series of on-line focus groups was conducted as part of a collaboration of 8 universities from 8 states (Michigan State University, Pennsylvania State University, South Dakota State University, Syracuse University, Tuskegee University, University of Maine, University of Rhode Island, and University of Wisconsin–Madison) to identify factors college students consider to be barriers and enablers to healthful weight management. Findings will be used to develop a Web-based weight management curriculum for college students using the Health at Every Size (HAES), nondiet approach that encourages internally regulated eating, enjoyment of eating and physical activity, and size acceptance.21

Section snippets

Description of Focus Groups and On-Line Assessments

Sixteen on-line focus groups were conducted synchronously22 using WebCT, a computer conferencing program, which allowed for the moderator and the focus group participants to interact in a chat-like format. A researcher trained in qualitative methods moderated all focus groups (8 with males and 8 with females) using a pilot-tested discussion guide.

To set the foundation for subsequent curriculum design, Keller's ARCS model (attention, relevance, confidence, satisfaction) was used to guide

Lessons Learned

In total, 115 (66%) of the 174 recruited students participated in the focus groups. More than half (54.8%) were female, and the majority was white (n = 94, 82.5%). Based on BMI, most participants were of normal weight (n = 83; 72.2%): however, 25.2% (n = 29) were overweight or obese. Almost all participants (n = 104, 90.3%) reported being comfortable or very comfortable using computers. There was no difference by sex in BMI status or comfort level with computer use (P > .05).

Table 1 presents

Discussion

An ecological model was used to interpret data from on-line focus groups in college students conducted separately by sex. An important finding from this study was that despite males and females having different weight goals, few sex differences were identified when considering barriers and enablers to weight management. Both males and females cited the same intrapersonal barriers (eg, not eating healthful food; not exercising), interpersonal barrier (social situations), and the environmental

Implications for Research and Practice

As barriers and enablers to weight management were identified at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental levels, intervention efforts should focus at both the individual and environmental levels simultaneously to facilitate behavior change. Weight management interventions for college students should be designed to emphasize the proximal benefits of consuming a healthful diet and being physically active that are salient for this population in conjunction with environmental

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the National Research Initiative of the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, grant number #2005-35215-15412. We appreciate the assistance of Breanna Lynch and Seung-Yeon Lee, and thank all of the students who participated in this study.

References (33)

  • N.M. Betts et al.

    Ways young adults view foods

    J Nutr Educ Behav

    (1997)
  • K.A. Cameron et al.

    Adolescents' experience with sex on the web: Results from online focus groups

    J Adolesc

    (2005)
  • T. Horacek et al.

    Decisional balance, self-efficacy and weight satisfaction discriminate stages of change for fruit and vegetable intakes among young men and women

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2002)
  • J.J. Arnett

    Emerging adulthood, a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties

    Am Psych

    (2000)
  • S.B. Racette et al.

    Weight changes, exercise, and dietary patterns during freshman and sophomore years of college

    J Am Coll Health

    (2005)
  • A.H. Mokdad et al.

    The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • T.M. Horacek et al.

    College students' dietary intake and quality according to their Myers Briggs type indicator personality preferences

    J Nutr Educ

    (1988)
  • American College Health Association. American College Health Association–National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA)...
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance: National College Health Risk Behavior Survey—United States, 1995

    Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (1997)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults—United States, 2000-2001

    Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2003)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity and health: a report of the surgeon general. Available...
  • K.A. Douglas et al.

    Results from the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey

    J Am Coll Health

    (1997)
  • C.E. Lewis et al.

    Weight gain continues in the 1990s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from the CARDIA study

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2000)
  • D.J. Hoffman et al.

    Changes in body weight and fat mass of men and women in the first year of college: a study of the “freshman 15”

    J Am Coll Health

    (2006)
  • D.A. Levitsky et al.

    The freshman weight gain: a model for the study of the epidemic of obesity

    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord

    (2004)
  • American College Health Association National College Health Assessment Spring 2006 Reference Group Data Report (abridged)

    J Am Coll Health

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    The study was supported by the National Research Initiative of the United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, grant number #2005-35215-15412.

    View full text