Mortality of patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea: the impact of Clostridium difficile
Introduction
Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) is the most common type of infectious nosocomial diarrhoea in adults in the developed world.1 C. difficile infection is implicated in 20–30% of all cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, 50–75% of cases of antibiotic-associated colitis and more than 90% of cases of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis in hospitalised patients.2 The reported mortality rates associated with C. difficile diarrhoea in observational and case–control studies vary from 0.6% to 83%.3, 4, 5, 6, 7
The objective of this prospective non-interventional study was to determine the impact of C. difficile infection on short- and long-term mortality in two hospital patient cohorts; one consisting of patients who received antibiotics and developed CDAD, and the other consisting of patients who received antibiotics and developed diarrhoea unrelated to C. difficile.
Section snippets
Patients
All patients with diarrhoea, hospitalised in our centre from October 15, 1999 to January 15, 2000 and whose stool samples were collected for C. difficile toxin assay in the Microbiology Laboratory, were identified and followed prospectively. Only patients who had received antibiotics within 40 days prior to the diarrhoeal episode were included. Diarrhoea was defined as the passage of three or more unformed stools for at least two days.8 CDAD was defined as diarrhoea unattributable to any other
Results
A total of 217 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 52 (24%) were found to have CDAD. The demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the entire cohort and by subgroups with positive or negative stool assays are shown in Table I. The patients with CDAD were significantly older than those without CDAD and had a worse functional capacity on admission to hospital in addition to more comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and decubitus ulcers. There
Discussion
We evaluated the short- and long-term mortality rates in a cohort of hospitalised patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea with and without proven C. difficile aetiology.
The most interesting finding of this prospective case–control study was that C. difficile infection was not associated with higher overall 28 day or long-term mortality rates in hospitalised patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Although both the crude 28 day and long-term mortality rates in our entire study
References (19)
- et al.
High prevalence of toxin A-negative toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile in hospitalised patients with gastrointestinal diseases
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
(2002) - et al.
Risk factors and mortality associated with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea at a VA hospital
Int J Antimicrob Agents
(2004) - et al.
Clostridium difficile colitis: factors influencing treatment failure and relapse, a prospective evaluation
Am J Gastroenterol
(1998) - et al.
Co-morbidity, not age, predicts adverse outcome in Clostridium difficile colitis
World J Gastoenterol
(2000) - et al.
Clostridium difficile colitis
N Engl J Med
(1994) - et al.
Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile
Clin Infect Dis
(2002) - et al.
Ten years of prospective Clostridium difficile-associated disease surveillance and treatment at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center, 1982–1991
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
(1994) - et al.
Risk of diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile during cefotaxime treatment; mortality due to C. difficile colitis in elderly people has been underestimated
Br Med J
(1996) - et al.
Prognostic criteria in Clostridium difficile colitis
Am J Gastroenterol
(1996)
Cited by (52)
Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection
2022, Journal of Infection and ChemotherapyClostridioides difficile epidemiology in the Middle and the Far East
2022, AnaerobeCitation Excerpt :Of them, 130 were excluded due to incomplete data (specific reasons are provided in the Supplementary Material). From 153 studies from 21 countries, 111 studies (18 countries) were included in the CDI prevalence meta-analysis (Supplementary Material) [10–29], [30-49], [50-69], [70-89], [90-109], [110-120]. Forty-two studies were excluded because of the selection of the patient population tested (e.g. children, cancer patients, inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes etc.).
A multi-institutional cohort study confirming the risks of Clostridium difficile infection associated with prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis
2018, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryExcess mortality between 2007 and 2014 among patients with Clostridium difficile infection: a French health insurance database analysis
2018, Journal of Hospital InfectionAnalysis of risk factors and clinical manifestations associated with Clostridium difficile disease in Serbian hospitalized patients
2016, Brazilian Journal of MicrobiologyEvaluation of advanced age as a risk factor for severe Clostridium difficile infection
2016, Journal of Clinical Gerontology and GeriatricsCitation Excerpt :Kyne et al11 found that the use of any GI instrumentation (colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, endoscopy) was associated with a fourfold increase in risk of severe disease compared with those who did not undergo any of these procedures. Although nasogastric tube feedings have also been shown to increase mortality in CDI, Dharmarajan et al7 and Bishara et al8 found no relationship between disease severity and nasogastric feeding. It is important to note that the definition of CDI severity differed among the mentioned studies, thus results should be interpreted carefully and applied to the appropriate patient populations.