Editorial

Concrete Steps Toward Academic Medicine in Long Term Care

To explore the course of quality of life (QoL) and possible resident-related predictors associated with this course in institutionalized people with young-onset dementia (YOD).

An observational longitudinal study.

A total of 278 residents with YOD were recruited from 13 YOD special care units in the Netherlands.

Secondary analyses were conducted with longitudinal data from the Behavior and Evolution in Young-ONset Dementia (BEYOND)-II study. QoL was assessed with proxy ratings, using the Quality of Life in Dementia (QUALIDEM) questionnaire at 4 assessment points over 18 months. Predictors included age, gender, dementia subtype, length of stay, dementia severity, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and psychotropic drug use at baseline. Multilevel modeling was used to adjust for the correlation of measurements within residents and clustering of residents within nursing homes.

The total QUALIDEM score (range: 0-111) decreased over 18 months with a small change of 0.65 (95% confidence interval −1.27, −0.04) points per 6 months. An increase in several domains of QoL regarding care relationship, positive self-image, and feeling at home was seen over time, whereas a decline was observed in the subscales positive affect, social relations, and having something to do. Residents with higher levels of QoL and more advanced dementia at baseline showed a more progressive decline in QoL over time. Sensitivity analyses indicated a more progressive decline in QoL for residents who died during the follow-up.

This study shows that although overall QoL in nursing home residents with YOD was relatively stable over 18 months, there were multidirectional changes in the QoL subscales that could be clinically relevant. Higher levels of QoL and more advanced stages of dementia at baseline predicted a more progressive decline in QoL over time. More longitudinal studies are needed to verify factors influencing QoL in YOD.

To assess the course of quality of life (QoL) in nursing home residents with dementia and to study its predictors.

This longitudinal, multicenter, observational cohort study with a 2-year follow-up looked at 290 residents with dementia, who lived in 14 dementia special care units in nine nursing homes in the Netherlands. QoL was assessed with the Qualidem, providing a total score and QoL profile with nine subscales. Residents were assessed at five assessments: every 6 months during 2 years. A linear mixed model was used for data analysis.

No change was found in the Qualidem total score (range: 0–111) over 2 years. However, a significant increase of QoL over time was seen in the subscales “Care relationship,” “Negative affect,” “Restless tense behavior,” “Positive self-image,” “Social isolation,” and “Feeling at home.” A significant decrease of QoL was seen in the subscales “Positive affect,” “Social relations,” and “Having something to do.” Most predictors of the course of Qol were found for the subscales “Positive self-image” (sex, Global Deterioration Scale, Severe Impairment Battery, Activities of Daily Living, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory) and “Having something to do” (Global Deterioration Scale, Severe Impairment Battery, and Activities of Daily Living). Sex and Neuropsychiatric Inventory at baseline were the predictors found most frequently.

The total QoL score was stable over a 2-year period. However, QoL subscales showed multidirectional changes. The largest QoL decline in the subscale “Having something to do” suggests that more attention should be given to useful activities in nursing home care.

Little is known about how the proportions of dependency states have changed between generational cohorts of older people. We aimed to estimate years lived in different dependency states at age 65 years in 1991 and 2011, and new projections of future demand for care.

In this population-based study, we compared two Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS I and CFAS II) of older people (aged ≥65 years) who were permanently registered with a general practice in three defined geographical areas (Cambridgeshire, Newcastle, and Nottingham; UK). These studies were done two decades apart (1991 and 2011). General practices provided lists of individuals to be contacted and were asked to exclude those who had died or might die over the next month. Baseline interviews were done in the community and care homes. Participants were stratified by age, and interviews occurred only after written informed consent was obtained. Information collected included basic sociodemographics, cognitive status, urinary incontinence, and self-reported ability to do activities of daily living. CFAS I was assigned as the 1991 cohort and CFAS II as the 2011 cohort, and both studies provided prevalence estimates of dependency in four states: high dependency (24-h care), medium dependency (daily care), low dependency (less than daily), and independent. Years in each dependency state were calculated by Sullivan's method. To project future demands for social care, the proportions in each dependency state (by age group and sex) were applied to the 2014 England population projections.

Between 1991 and 2011, there were significant increases in years lived from age 65 years with low dependency (1·7 years [95% CI 1·0–2·4] for men and 2·4 years [1·8–3·1] for women) and increases with high dependency (0·9 years [0·2–1·7] for men and 1·3 years [0·5–2·1] for women). The majority of men's extra years of life were spent independent (36·3%) or with low dependency (36·3%) whereas for women the majority were spent with low dependency (58·0%), and only 4·8% were independent. There were substantial reductions in the proportions with medium and high dependency who lived in care homes, although, if these dependency and care home proportions remain constant in the future, further population ageing will require an extra 71 215 care home places by 2025.

On average older men now spend 2·4 years and women 3·0 years with substantial care needs, and most will live in the community. These findings have considerable implications for families of older people who provide the majority of unpaid care, but the findings also provide valuable new information for governments and care providers planning the resources and funding required for the care of their future ageing populations.

Medical Research Council (G9901400) and (G06010220), with support from the National Institute for Health Research Comprehensive Local research networks in West Anglia and Trent, UK, and Neurodegenerative Disease Research Network in Newcastle, UK.

In geriatric rehabilitation it is important to have timely discharge of patients, especially if they have low nursing support needs. However, no instruments are available to identify early discharge potential.

To evaluate if weekly scoring of a nursing support scorecard in the evenings/nights and discussing the results in the multidisciplinary team meeting, leads to potential differences in discharge of geriatric rehabilitation patients.

Quasi-experimental study with a reference cohort (n = 200) and a Back-Home implementation cohort (n = 283).

Patients in geriatric rehabilitation in the four participating skilled nursing facilities in the Netherlands.

Implementation of the nursing support scorecard during one year consisted of (1) weekly scoring of the scorecard to identify the supporting nursing tasks during the evenings/nights by trained nurses, and (2) discussion of the results in a multidisciplinary team meeting to establish if discharge home planning was feasible. Data on patients’ characteristics and setting before admission were collected at admission; at discharge, the length of stay, discharge destination and barriers for discharge were collected by the nursing staff.

Both cohorts were comparable with regard to median age, gender [reference cohort: 81 (IQR 75–88) years; 66% females vs. Back-Home cohort 82 (IQR 76–87) years; 71% females] and reasons for admission: stroke (23% vs. 23%), joint replacement (12% vs. 13%), traumatic injuries (31% vs. 34%), and other (35% vs. 30%). Overall, the median length of stay for the participants discharged home in the reference cohort was 56 (IQR 29–81) days compared to 46 (IQR 30–96) days in the Back-Home cohort (p = 0.08). When no home adjustments were needed, participants were discharged home after 50 (IQR 29.5–97) days in the reference cohort, and after 42.5 (IQR 26–64.8) days in the Back-Home cohort (p = 0.03). Reasons for discharge delay were environmental factors (36.7%) and patient-related factors, such as mental (21.5%) and physical capacity (33.9%).

Structured scoring of supporting nursing tasks for geriatric rehabilitation patients may lead to earlier discharge from a skilled nursing facility to home, if no home adjustments are needed.